Chapter 6: Problem 19
List some of the reasons why economists should not consider GDP an effective measure of the standard of living in a country.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 6: Problem 19
List some of the reasons why economists should not consider GDP an effective measure of the standard of living in a country.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Why do you think that GDP does not grow at a steady rate, but rather speeds up and slows down?
Last year, a small nation with abundant forests cut down 200 dollar worth of trees. It then turned 100 dollar worth of trees into 150 dollar worth of lumber. It used 100 dollar worth of that lumber to produce 250 dollar worth of bookshelves. Assuming the country produces no other outputs, and there are no other inputs used in producing trees, lumber, and bookshelves, what is this nation's GDP? In other words, what is the value of the final goods the nation produced including trees, lumber and bookshelves?
Is it possible for GDP to rise while at the same time per capita GDP is falling? Is it possible for GDP to fall while per capita GDP is rising?
What are the two main difficulties that arise in comparing different countries's GDP?
Cross country comparisons of GDP per capita typically use purchasing power parity equivalent exchange rates, which are a measure of the long run equilibrium value of an exchange rate. In fact, we used PPP equivalent exchange rates in this module. Why could using market exchange rates, which sometimes change dramatically in a short period of time, be misleading?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.