Chapter 19: Problem 21
What does GDP not tell us about the economy?
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 19: Problem 21
What does GDP not tell us about the economy?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
How do you convert a series of nominal economic data over time to real terms?
In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of \$70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 5.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had a GDP of \$160 billion (measured in U.S. dollars) and a population of 5.3 million. By what percentage did Denmark's GDP per capita rise between 1980 and \(2000 ?\)
Last year, a small nation with abundant forests cut down \(\$ 200\) worth of trees. It then turned \(\$ 100\) worth of trees into \(\$ 150\) worth of lumber. It used \(\$ 100\) worth of that lumber to produce \(\$ 250\) worth of bookshelves. Assuming the country produces no other outputs, and there are no other inputs used in producing trees, lumber, and bookshelves, what is this nation's GDP? In other words, what is the value of the final goods the nation produced including trees, lumber and bookshelves?
Cross country comparisons of GDP per capita typically use purchasing power parity equivalent exchange rates, which are a measure of the long run equilibrium value of an exchange rate. In fact, we used PPP equivalent exchange rates in this module. Why could using market exchange rates, which sometimes change dramatically in a short period of time, be misleading?
Why might per capita GDP be only an imperfect measure of a country's standard of living?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.