/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6. In Exercise 4 in Chapter 2 (page... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercise 4 in Chapter 2 (page 84), we examined a vegetable fiber traded in a competitive world market and imported into the United States at a world price of \(9 per pound. U.S. domestic supply and demand for various price levels are shown in the following table.

Price

U.S. Supply (Million Pounds)

U.S. Demand (Million Pounds)

3

2

34

6

4

28

9

6

22

12

8

16

15

10

10

18

12

4

Answer the following questions about the U.S. market:

a. Confirm that the demand curve is given by QD = 40 - 2P, and that the supply curve is given by QS = 2/3P.

b. Confirm that if there were no restrictions on trade, the United States would import 16 million pounds.

c. If the United States imposes a tariff of \)3 per pound, what will be the U.S. price and level of imports? How much revenue will the government earn from the tariff? How large is the deadweight loss?

d. If the United States has no tariff but imposes an import quota of 8 million pounds, what will be the U.S. domestic price? What is the cost of this quota for U.S. consumers of fiber? What is the gain for U.S. producers?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. For each value of the given price in the table, the value of supply and demand determined by the equations is the same as the values given in the table.

b. At a world price level of $9, the demanded quantity exceeds the supplied quantity by 16 million pounds of vegetable fiber in the domestic market.

c. The new U.S price would be $12 per pound, and the import level would be 8 million pounds after the tariff of $3 is imposed on vegetable fiber.

The government will earn $24 million in revenue.

The deadweight loss would be 6 million pounds of fiber.

d. The new U.S. domestic price will be $12 per ounce.

The costs on consumers will be $3 per ounce.

The gain for U.S. producers will be $6 million pounds.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Confirmation about the demand curve and supply curve

If the value of demanded quantity coincides with the demand values given in the table after putting different price levels, then the equation is correct for the demand schedule. The same goes for the given supply curve equation.

The demand equation is QD = 40 - 2P. The value of QD for price levels 3,6,9,12,15, and 18 is calculated below:

For price $3, the value of QD is 40 - 2×3 = 34

For price $6, the value of QD is 40 - 2×6 = 28

For price $9, the value of QD is 40 - 2×9 = 22

For price $12, the value of QD is 40 - 2×12 = 16

For price $15, the value of QD is 40 - 2×15 = 10

For price $18, the value of QD is 40 - 2×18 = 4

The values of QD coincide with the values given in the table for the demand schedule. Thus, the equation is true for the demand curve.

A similar process is applied to check for the supply equation QS = 2/3P.

For price $3, the value of QS is 2/3×3 = 2

For price $6, the value of QS is 2/3×6 = 4

For price $9, the value of QS is 2/3×9 = 6

For price $12, the value of QS is 2/3×12 = 8

For price $15, the value of QS is 2/3×15 = 10

For price $18, the value of QS is 2/3×18 = 12

The values of QS coincide with the values given in the table for the supply schedule. Thus, the equation is true for the supply curve.

02

Step 2. Determining the U.S. imports in the absence of any restriction.

The world price of fiber is $9. In the absence of any import restrictions, the price of fiber in the U.S. market would be the same. The demanded quantity is 22 million pounds of fiber at this price level, but the U.S. market is supplying only 6 million pounds of fiber. The demand exceeds the supplied quantity.

U.S. market will import fiver to cover the excess demand. The difference between the demanded quantity and supplied quantity is the quantity imported by the U.S market.

Import=DemandedQuantity-SuppliedQuantity=22-6=16

The value of the imported quantity is 16 million pounds.

03

Step 3. Impact of tariff on U.S. price and level of imports 

A $3 per pound tariff on imported quantity will increase the price of the vegetable fiber by $3 in the U.S market. Hence, the price of the vegetable fiber after the imposition of tariff would be $12 per pound.

At this price level, the supplied quantity is 8 pounds, and demanded quantity is 16 pounds as in the market. The supply has increased, and demand has decreased after the imposition of tariffs. The new level import is calculated below:

NewImport=DemandedQuantity-SuppliedQuantity=16-8=8

The new import level is 8 million pounds of vegetable fiber.

Government revenue: The government will earn revenue equal to the product of quantity imported and the amount of tariff on each quantity. Thus, the government revenue will be:

Governmentrevenue=Quantityimportedmillionpounds×Tariff$=8millionpounds×3=24millionpounds

The value of the deadweight loss: The deadweight loss is the loss to the society created due to the tariff imposed by the government. It is calculated by multiplying the difference between the prices (P2 - P1) and quantities (Q1 – Q2) of the pre-tariff and post-tariff situations. The deadweight loss is calculated below:

DWL=P2-P1Q1-Q2=12-98-6=3×2=6

The tariff policy created a deadweight loss of $6 million pounds to society.

04

Step 4. Impact of quota on domestic price, producers, and consumers

In the absence of any restriction, the U.S. market was importing 16 million pounds of vegetable fiber. The quota will limit the quantity of vegetables imported into the U.S. market to 8 million pounds since the import quantity is the shortage of goods in the U.S. market. It provides the equation for quota as:

Import = Quantity demanded (QD) –Quantity supplied (QS). Putting the values of import, QD, and QS, the new price after the quota policy is calculated below:

Import=QD-QS8=40-2P-23P40-8=2P+23PP=12

After implementing the quota policy, the new U.S. domestic price of fiber will be $12 per pound.

Cost on consumers: In the absence of any import restrictions, U.S. consumers could purchase the vegetable fiber at the world price of $9. The quota policy increased the price of fiber to $12. Thus, the cost on consumers is the difference between the new price (P2) and the previous price (P1).

CostonConsumers=P2-P1=12-9=3

The cost on consumers is $3 per pound of vegetable fiber.

Gain for U.S. producers: The gain to producers is the product of the increase in price level and the quantity after the quota implementation. The new price level is $12 per pound, and the quantity supplied at this price level is 8 million pounds. The gain for producers is:

GainforU.S.producers=IncreaseinPrice×InreaseinQuantitysupplied=$3×2millionpounds=$6millionpounds

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Example 9.6 (page 353) describes the effects of the sugar quota. In 2016, imports were limited to 6.1 billion pounds, which pushed the domestic price to 27 cents per pound. Suppose imports were expanded to 10 billion pounds.

a. What would be the new U.S. domestic price?

b. How much would consumers gain and domestic producers lose?

c. What would be the effect on deadweight loss and foreign producers?

What does the term "nationalization" mean?

About 100 million pounds of jelly beans are consumed in the United States each year, and the price has been about 50 cents per pound. However, jelly bean producers feel that their incomes are too low and have convinced the government that price supports are in order. The government will therefore buy up as many jelly beans as necessary to keep the price at \(1 per pound. However, government economists are worried about the impact of this program because they have no estimates of the elasticities of jelly bean demand or supply.

a. Could this program cost the government more than \)50 million per year? Under what conditions?Could it cost less than \(50 million per year? Under what conditions? Illustrate with a diagram.

b. Could this program cost consumers (in terms of lost consumer surplus) more than \)50 million per year? Under what conditions? Could it cost consumers less than $50 million per year? Under what conditions? Again, use a diagram to illustrate.

From time to time, Congress has raised the minimum wage. Some people suggested that a government subsidy could help employers finance the higher wage. This exercise examines the economics of minimum wage and wage subsidies. Suppose the supply of low-skilled labor is given by

LS= 10w

where, LS is the quantity of low-skilled labor (in millions of persons employed each year), and w is the wage rate(in dollars per hour). The demand for labor is given by

LD= 80 - 10w

a. What will be the free-market wage rate and employment level? Suppose the government sets a minimum wage of \(5 per hour. How many people would then be employed?

b. Suppose that instead of a minimum wage, the government pays a subsidy of \)1 per hour for each employee. What will the total level of employment be now? What will the equilibrium wage rate be?

In Example 9.1 (page 332), we calculated the gains and losses from price controls on natural gas and found that there was a deadweight loss of \(5.68 billion. This calculation was based on a price of oil of \)50 per barrel.

a. If the price of oil were \(60 per barrel, what would be the free-market price of gas? How large a deadweight loss would result if the maximum allowable price of natural gas were \)3.00 per thousand cubic feet?

b. What price of oil would yield a free-market price of natural gas of $3?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.