/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11. Two firms compete by choosing pr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Two firms compete by choosing price. Their demand functions are

Q1 = 20 - P1 + P2

and

Q2 = 20 + P1 - P2

where P1 and P2 are the prices charged by each firm, respectively, and Q1 and Q2 are the resulting demands. Note that the demand for each good depends only on the difference in prices; if the two firms colluded and set the same price, they could make that price as high as they wanted, and earn infinite profits. Marginal costs are zero.

  1. Suppose the two firms set their prices at the same time. Find the resulting Nash equilibrium. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be? (Hint: Maximize the profit of each firm with respect to its price.)
  2. Suppose Firm 1 sets its price first and then Firm 2 sets its price. What price will each firm charge, how much will it sell, and what will its profit be?
  3. Suppose you are one of these firms and that there are three ways you could play the game: (i) Both firms set price at the same time; (ii) You set price first; or (iii) Your competitor sets price first. If you could choose among these options, which would you prefer? Explain why.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Each firm will produce 20 units at $20. The profit for each firm will be $400.
  2. Firm 1 will charge $30 and sell 15 units; firm 2 will charge $25 and sell 25 units. The profit from firm 1 will be $450, and for firm 2 will be $625.
  3. Option (iii) will be the best choice as it gives a higher profit.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The Nash equilibrium will be obtained at the interaction of both the firm’s reaction curves.

The reaction curve of firm 1 is calculated below:

Ï€1=P1Q1-C1=20P1-P12-P1P2-0»åÏ€1dP1=20-2P1+P2=020-2P1+P2=02P1=20+P2P1=10+0.5P2

The reaction curve of firm 2 is calculated below:

Ï€2=P2Q2-C2=20P2-P22+P1P2-0»åÏ€2dP2=20-2P2+P1=020-2P2+P1=02P2=20+P1P2=10+0.5P1

From both the reaction curve,

P1=10+0.510+0.5P1=10+5+0.25P10.75P1=15P1=$20P2=10+0.520=10+10=$20

Each firm will charge $20.

The output of the firm is calculated below:

Q1=20-20+20=20Q2=20+20-20=20

Each firm will produce 20 units.

The profit of each firm is calculated below:

π1=20×20-0=$400π2=20×20-0=$400

Each firm profit will be $400.

02

Explanation for part (b)

Firm 1 is the leading firm and sets the price; thus, it takes the reaction curve of firm 2 into account while selecting the price. Therefore, firm 1 price will be:

Ï€1=20P1-P12+P110+0.5P1-0=30P1-0.5P12»åÏ€1dP1=30-P1=0P1=$30

Firm 2 price will be:

P2=10+0.5(30)=$25

The price charged by firm 1 will be $30, and by firm 2 will be $25.

The quantity of both firms is calculated below:

Q1= 20 - 30 + 25= 15Q2= 20 + 30 - 25= 25

Firm 1 will produce 15 units, and firm 2 will be 25 units.

The profit of both the firm will be:

π1=30×15-0=$450π2=25×25-0=$625

The profit of firm 1 will be $450, and firm 2 will be $625.

03

Explanation for part (c)

The nash equilibrium profit will be $400. The profit of the leader firm will be $450, and for the follower firm, it will be $625. Thus, option (iii) will be preferred as it gives higher profit.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that two identical firms produce widgets and that they are the only firms in the market. Their costs are given by C1 = 60Q1 and C2 = 60Q2, where Q1 is the output of Firm 1 and Q2 the output of Firm 2. Price is determined by the following demand curve P = 300 – Q where Q = Q1 + Q2.

  1. Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Calculate the profit of each firm at this equilibrium.
  2. Suppose the two firms form a cartel to maximize joint profits. How many widgets will be produced? Calculate each firm’s profit.
  3. Suppose Firm 1 were the only firm in the industry. How would market output and Firm 1’s profit differ from that found in part (b) above?
  4. Returning to the duopoly of part (b), suppose Firm 1 abides by the agreement, but Firm 2 cheats by increasing production. How many widgets will Firm 2 produce? What will be each firm’s profits?

Two firms produce luxury sheepskin auto seat covers: Western Where (WW) and B.B.B. Sheep (BBBS). Each firm has a cost function given by

C(q) = 30q + 1.5q2

The market demand for these seat covers is represented by the inverse demand equation

P = 300 - 3Q

where Q = q1 + q2, total output.

  1. If each firm acts to maximize its profits, taking its rival’s output as given (i.e., the firms behave as Cournot oligopolists), what will be the equilibrium quantities selected by each firm? What is total output, and what is the market price? What are the profits for each firm?
  2. It occurs to the managers of WW and BBBS that they could do a lot better by colluding. If the two firms collude, what will be the profit-maximizing choice of output? The industry price? The output and the profit for each firm in this case?
  3. The managers of these firms realize that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each firm must decide on its own whether to produce the Cournot quantity or the cartel quantity. To aid in making the decision, the manager of WW constructs a payoff matrix like the one below. Fill in each box with the profit of WW and the profit of BBBS. Given this payoff matrix, what output strategy is each firm likely to pursue

    PROFIT PAYOFF MAXTRIX

    (WW PROFIT, BBBS PROFIT)

    BBBS

    PRODUCECOURNOT q

    PRODUCE CARTEL q

    WW

    PRODUCE COURNOT q

    PRODUCE CARTEL q

d. Suppose WW can set its output level before BBBS does. How much will WW choose to produce in this case? How much will BBBS produce? What is the market price, and what is the profit for each firm? Is WW better off by choosing its output first? Explain why or why not.

Demand for light bulbs can be characterized by Q = 100 - P, where Q is in millions of boxes of lights sold and P is the price per box. There are two producers of lights, Everglow and Dimlit. They have identical cost functions: Ci = 10Qi +1/2Qi2(i = E, D) Q = QE + QD

  1. Unable to recognize the potential for collusion, the two firms act as short-run perfect competitors. What are the equilibrium values of QE, QD, and P? What are each firm’s profits?
  2. Top management in both firms is replaced. Each new manager independently recognizes the oligopolistic nature of the light bulb industry and plays Cournot. What are the equilibrium values of QE, QD, and P? What are each firm’s profits?
  3. Suppose the Everglow manager guesses correctly that Dimlit is playing Cournot, so Everglow plays Stackelberg. What are the equilibrium values of QE, QD, and P? What are each firm’s profits?
  4. If the managers of the two companies collude, what are the equilibrium values of QE, QD, and P? What are each firm’s profits?

Suppose the airline industry consisted of only two firms: American and Texas Air Corp. Let the two firms have identical cost functions, C(q) = 40q. Assume that the demand curve for the industry is given by P = 100 - Q and that each firm expects the other to behave as a Cournot competitor.

  1. Calculate the Cournot-Nash equilibrium for each firm, assuming that each chooses the output level that maximizes its profits when taking its rival’s output as given. What are the profits of each firm?
  2. What would be the equilibrium quantity if Texas Air had constant marginal and average costs of \(25 and American had constant marginal and average costs of \)40?
  3. Assuming that both firms have the original cost function, C(q) = 40q, how much should Texas Air be willing to invest to lower its marginal cost from 40 to 25, assuming that American will not follow suit? How much should American be willing to spend to reduce its marginal cost to 25, assuming that Texas Air will have marginal costs of 25 regardless of American’s actions?

A lemon-growing cartel consists of four orchards. Their total cost functions are

TC1 = 20 + 5Q12

TC2 = 25 + 3Q22

TC3 = 15 + 4Q32

TC4 = 20 + 6Q42

TC is in hundreds of dollars, and Q is in cartons per month picked and shipped.

  1. Tabulate total, average, and marginal costs for each firm for output levels between 1 and 5 cartons per month (i.e., for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 cartons).
  2. If the cartel decided to ship 10 cartons per month and set a price of $25 per carton, how should output be allocated among the firms?
  3. At this shipping level, which firm has the most incentive to cheat? Does any firm not have an incentive to cheat?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.