/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 The market for paper in a partic... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The market for paper in a particular region in the United States is characterized by the following demand and supply curves: \\[Q_{D}=160,000-2000 P \quad \text { and } \quad Q_{S}=40,000+2000 P\\] where \(Q_{D}\) is the quantity demanded in 100 -pound lots, \(Q_{S}\) is the quantity supplied in 100 -pound lots, and \(P\) is the price per 100 -pound lot. Currently there is no attempt to regulate the dumping of effluent into streams and rivers by the paper mills. As a result, dumping is widespread. The marginal external cost (MEC) associated with the production of paper is given by the curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=0.0006 \mathrm{Q}_{\mathrm{S}}.\) a. Calculate the output and price of paper if it is produced under competitive conditions and no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the dumping of effluent. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of paper. c. Explain why the answers you calculated in parts (a) and (b) differ.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The competitive market doesn't take into account the external cost of pollution, thus the price will be lower and quantity higher than in a socially efficient scenario, wherein these costs are taken into account.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Output and Price under Competitive Conditions

To find the equilibrium under competitive conditions (no regulation), equate the quantity demanded (\(Q_{D}\)) to the quantity supplied (\(Q_{S}\)). \n\nThus, \(160,000-2000P = 40,000+2000P\). Solving for P (price) and then substituting the price to either of the equations to get the equilibrium quantity.
02

Calculate the Socially Efficient Price and Output

To find the socially efficient price and output, consider the marginal external cost (MEC). The socially efficient level of output is found where the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity supplied, plus the marginal external cost (MEC).\n\n Therefore, set \(Q_D = Q_S + MEC\). \n\nSubstitute \(Q_S\) and \(MEC\) with their equivalent expressions in terms of \(Q\) and solve for \(Q\) and \(P\).
03

Comparison of Competitive vs Socially Efficient Outcomes

From step 1 and 2, we will have two sets of price and quantity values. Explain the difference in outcomes due to the existence of the external costs in production that were not taken into account in the competitive equilibrium situation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Demand and Supply Curves
The demand and supply curves are fundamental tools used in economics to understand how market forces determine prices and quantities. In our scenario, the demand curve is given by the equation \(Q_{D} = 160,000 - 2000P\), where \(Q_{D}\) is the quantity demanded and \(P\) is the price per 100-pound lot of paper. As the price increases, the quantity demanded decreases, showing an inverse relationship.
Similarly, the supply curve is represented by \(Q_{S} = 40,000 + 2000P\), indicating a direct relationship between price and quantity supplied. As the price rises, suppliers are more willing to produce and sell more paper.

To find the equilibrium, where market supply equals demand, we set the demand and supply equations equal:
\[160,000 - 2000P = 40,000 + 2000P\] Solving this equation helps determine the equilibrium price \(P_e\) and equilibrium quantity \(Q_e\) that clear the market.
  • When quantity demanded equals quantity supplied, the market is in equilibrium.
  • Changes in external factors like costs or regulations can shift these curves, altering equilibrium.
Marginal External Cost
Marginal External Cost (MEC) is an essential concept when considering the impact of production on third parties who are not involved in a transaction. In the paper market context, the MEC is the additional cost imposed on the environment due to the effluent dumping by paper mills. The given MEC is expressed as \(MEC = 0.0006Q_{S}\).

This cost is not reflected in the supply curve under competitive conditions, leading to a market failure where the social costs exceed the private costs borne by producers.

To account for MEC in achieving social efficiency, we integrate it into the supply equation:
  • The true social cost includes both private production costs and external environmental costs.
  • Considering MEC helps in assessing true resource allocation and welfare implications.
Social Efficiency
Social efficiency occurs when the total welfare in the economy is maximized, and this includes both consumers' and producers' benefits while considering any externalities like MEC. Achieving social efficiency requires aligning the quantity supplied to factor in these external costs.

In our example, social efficiency is reached by adjusting the output level where \(Q_D = Q_S + MEC\). This includes the external marginal costs in the market supply, aptly balancing between production benefits and potential environmental harm.

The socially efficient price and quantity reflect the true cost of production, including the previously ignored external costs.
  • Socially efficient outcomes typically result in lower quantities and higher prices than competitive equilibrium.
  • Regulations or taxes might be necessary to internalize external costs and move markets toward social efficiency.

Until such externalities are addressed, market equilibrium does not coincide with social efficiency, spotlighting the importance of comprehensive policy interventions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that scientific studies provide you with the following information concerning the benefits and costs of sulfur dioxide emissions: Benefits of abating (reducing) emissions: \(M B=500-20 A\) costs of abating emissions: \(M C=200+5 A\) where \(A\) is the quantity abated in millions of tons and the benefits and costs are given in dollars per ton. a. What is the socially efficient level of emissions abatement? b. What are the marginal benefit and marginal cost of abatement at the socially efficient level of abatement? c. What happens to net social benefits (benefits minus costs if you abate one million more tons than the efficient level? One million fewer? d. Why is it socially efficient to set marginal benefits equal to marginal costs rather than abating until total benefits equal total costs?

There are three groups in a community. Their demand curves for public television in hours of programming, \(T,\) are given respectively by \\[\begin{array}{l} W_{1}=\$ 200-T \\ W_{2}=\$ 240-2 T \\ W_{3}=\$ 320-2 T \end{array}\\] Suppose public television is a pure public good that can be produced at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 200\) per hour a. What is the efficient number of hours of public television? b. How much public television would a competitive private market provide?

A computer programmer lobbies against copyrighting software, arguing that everyone should benefit from innovative programs written for personal computers and that exposure to a wide variety of computer programs will inspire young programmers to create even more innovative programs. Considering the marginal social benefits possibly gained by this proposal, do you agree with this position?

In a market for dry cleaning, the inverse market demand function is given by \(P=100-Q,\) and the (private \()\) marginal cost of production for the aggregation of all dry-cleaning firms is given by \(\mathrm{MC}=10+Q\). Finally, the pollution generated by the dry cleaning process creates external damages given by the marginal external cost curve \(\mathrm{MEC}=Q\). a. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under competitive conditions without regulation. b. Determine the socially efficient price and output of dry cleaning. c. Determine the tax that would result in a competitive market producing the socially efficient output. d. Calculate the output and price of dry cleaning if it is produced under monopolistic conditions without regulation. e. Determine the tax that would result in a monopolistic market producing the socially efficient output. f. Assuming that no attempt is made to monitor or regulate the pollution, which market structure yields higher social welfare? Discuss.

The Georges Bank, a highly productive fishing area off New England, can be divided into two zones in terms of fish population. Zone 1 has the higher population per square mile but is subject to severe diminishing returns to fishing effort. The daily fish catch (in tons) in Zone 1 is \\[F_{1}=200\left(X_{1}\right)-2\left(X_{1}\right)^{2}\\] where \(X_{1}\) is the number of boats fishing there. Zone 2 has fewer fish per mile but is larger, and diminishing returns are less of a problem. Its daily fish catch is \\[F_{2}=100\left(X_{2}\right)-\left(X_{2}\right)^{2}\\] where \(X_{2}\) is the number of boats fishing in Zone \(2 .\) The marginal fish catch MFC in each zone can be represented as \\[\begin{array}{l} \mathrm{MFC}_{1}=200-4\left(\mathrm{X}_{1}\right) \\ \mathrm{MFC}_{2}=100-2\left(\mathrm{X}_{2}\right) \end{array}\\] There are 100 boats now licensed by the U.S. government to fish in these two zones. The fish are sold at \(\$ 100\) per ton. Total cost (capital and operating) per boat is constant at \(\$ 1000\) per day. Answer the following questions about this situation: a. If the boats are allowed to fish where they want, with no government restriction, how many will fish in each zone? What will be the gross value of the catch? b. If the U.S. government can restrict the number and distribution of the boats, how many should be allocated to each zone? What will be the gross value of the catch? Assume the total number of boats remains at 100. c. If additional fishermen want to buy boats and join the fishing fleet, should a government wishing to maximize the net value of the catch grant them licenses? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.