/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Connie has a monthly income of \... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Connie has a monthly income of \(\$ 200\) that she allocates between two goods: meat and potatoes. a. Suppose meat costs \(\$ 4\) per pound and potatoes \(\$ 2\) per pound. Draw her budget constraint. b. Suppose also that her utility function is given by the equation \(U(M, P)=2 M+P .\) What combination of meat and potatoes should she buy to maximize her utility? (Hint: Meat and potatoes are perfect substitutes.) c. Connie's supermarket has a special promotion. If she buys 20 pounds of potatoes (at \(\$ 2\) per pound), she gets the next 10 pounds for free. This offer applies only to the first 20 pounds she buys. All potatoes in excess of the first 20 pounds (excluding bonus potatoes are still \(\$ 2\) per pound. Draw her budget constraint. d. An outbreak of potato rot raises the price of potatoes to \(\$ 4\) per pound. The supermarket ends its promotion. What does her budget constraint look like now? What combination of meat and potatoes maximizes her utility?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The budget constraint will be a line starting from 50 (pounds of meat Connie can afford if she spends all her money on meat) to 100 (pounds of potatoes she can afford if she only buys potatoes). b. She can choose any combination of meat and potatoes that lies on her budget line, because both goods give her the same utility per dollar. c. The budget line will be broken at 20 and 30 pounds of potatoes, representing the promotional offer. d. The budget line will be steeper and start from 50 units of meat and end at 50 units of potatoes. As utility per dollar for meat surpasses potatoes, she will spend her entire income on meat.

Step by step solution

01

- Plot the Budget Constraints (Part a)

Plot the budget constraint by setting up the equation using the formula: \(P_M \cdot M + P_P \cdot P = I\), where \(P_M\), \(P_P\), \(M\), and \(P\) represent the price of meat, price of potatoes, quantity of meat, and quantity of potatoes, respectively, and \(I\) represents the income. Plug the given values into the equation and rearrange the equation to \(P = (I - P_M \cdot M) / P_P\). This equation represents the budget line, which is a downward sloping line starting from the point \(M = I / P_M\) and ending at \(P = I / P_P\).
02

- Find the Optimal Consumption Bundle (Part b)

Calculate the optimal combination using the utility function \(U(M, P) = 2M + P\). Since meat and potatoes are perfect substitutes for Connie, she will spend all her income on the good that provides the highest utility per dollar. Calculate utility per dollar for both goods, \(U_M / P_M = 2 / 4 = 0.5\) and \(U_P / P_P = 1 / 2 = 0.5\). Since both are equal, she can buy any combination of meat and potatoes within her budget constraint.
03

- Draw the New Budget Constraint (Part c)

Modify the budget line to reflect the promotional offer. The equation for the first 20 pounds of potatoes remains the same but for quantities greater than 20, the line is steeper upwards for the next 10 pounds (free potatoes), and beyond this quantity, the slope of the budget line is again the same as the original. The new budget line starts at \(M = I / P_M\), goes to \(P = 20 + 10 = 30\) (including free potatoes) at \(M = (I - 20 \cdot P_P) / P_M\), and then runs parallel to the original line.
04

- Plot the Final Budget Constraint and Determine the Optimal Combination (Part d)

Take the new prices and draw a new budget line, which is steeper than the original due to an increase in potato prices. Find the new optimal combination using the utility per dollar (like in Step 2). If the utility per dollar for meat is greater than potatoes, all income is spent on meat, and if utility per dollar for potatoes is more than meat, spend all income on potatoes. Recalculate the utility per dollar for each, with the new potato price. If the utility per dollar of any goods changes, she will buy more of the one with higher utility per dollar.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The utility that Meredith receives by consuming food \(F\) and clothing \(C\) is given by \(U(F, C)=F C .\) Suppose that Meredith's income in 1990 is \(\$ 1200\) and that the prices of food and clothing are \(\$ 1\) per unit for each. By 2000 however, the price of food has increased to \(\$ 2\) and the price of clothing to \(\$ 3 .\) Let 100 represent the cost of living index for \(1990 .\) Calculate the ideal and the Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Meredith for 2000 (Hint: Meredith will spend equal amounts on food and clothing with these preferences.)

The price of DVDs \((D)\) is \(\$ 20\) and the price of \(\operatorname{CDs}(C)\) is \(\$ 10 .\) Philip has a budget of \(\$ 100\) to spend on the two goods. Suppose that he has already bought one DVD and one CD. In addition, there are 3 more DVDs and 5 more CDs that he would really like to buy. a. Given the above prices and income, draw his budget line on a graph with CDs on the horizontal axis. b. Considering what he has already purchased and what he still wants to purchase, identify the three different bundles of CDs and DVDs that he could choose. For this part of the question, assume that he cannot purchase fractional units.

Julio receives utility from consuming food ( \(F\) ) and clothing \((C)\) as given by the utility function \(U(F, C)=F C\) In addition, the price of food is \(\$ 2\) per unit, the price of clothing is \(\$ 10\) per unit, and Julio's weekly income is \$50. a. What is Julio's marginal rate of substitution of food for clothing when utility is maximized? Explain. b. Suppose instead that Julio is consuming a bundle with more food and less clothing than his utility maximizing bundle. Would his marginal rate of substitution of food for clothing be greater than or less than your answer in part a? Explain.

Consumers in Georgia pay twice as much for avocados as they do for peaches. However, avocados and peaches are the same price in California. If consumers in both states maximize utility, will the marginal rate of substitution of peaches for avocados be the same for consumers in both states? If not, which will be higher?

Connie has a monthly income of \(\$ 200\) that she allocates between two goods: meat and potatoes. a. Suppose meat costs \(\$ 4\) per pound and potatoes \(\$ 2\) per pound. Draw her budget constraint. b. Suppose also that her utility function is given by the equation \(U(M, P)=2 M+P .\) What combination of meat and potatoes should she buy to maximize her utility? (Hint: Meat and potatoes are perfect substitutes.) c. Connie's supermarket has a special promotion. If she buys 20 pounds of potatoes (at \(\$ 2\) per pound), she gets the next 10 pounds for free. This offer applies only to the first 20 pounds she buys. All potatoes in excess of the first 20 pounds (excluding bonus potatoes are still \(\$ 2\) per pound. Draw her budget constraint. d. An outbreak of potato rot raises the price of potatoes to \(\$ 4\) per pound. The supermarket ends its promotion. What does her budget constraint look like now? What combination of meat and potatoes maximizes her utility?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.