/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 According to towerswatson.com, a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to towerswatson.com, at large employers, \(48 \%\) of employees earning between \(\$ 10,000\) and \(\$ 24,999\) a year participated in a voluntary retirement savings program, compared to \(91 \%\) who earned more than \(\$ 100,000\). We can view savings as a good. In a figure, plot savings versus all other goods. Show why a person is more likely to "buy" some savings (put money in a retirement account) as the person's income rises.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Higher incomes enable increased savings while still affording other goods.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Relationship

We are examining the relationship between an individual's income and their likelihood to save, specifically through a retirement savings program. To do this, we consider two different income groups: low income ($10,000-$24,999) and high income (more than $100,000).
02

Identify Key Variables

In this exercise, the variables are 'savings' and 'all other goods'. Savings is represented by the percentage participation in the retirement savings program, which is 48% for the low-income group and 91% for the high-income group.
03

Set Up the Graph

To plot these variables, draw a graph with 'Savings' on the vertical axis and 'All Other Goods' on the horizontal axis. You can think of this as an individual's budget constraint showing how they allocate their income between savings and all other goods.
04

Plot Points for Different Incomes

On the graph, plot two points representing the participation rates: one at (48, low income) and another at (91, high income). These points will demonstrate different savings behaviors at different income levels.
05

Explain the Income Effect

As income increases, individuals are able to allocate more to savings while still maintaining or increasing consumption of other goods. This ability to afford more of both goods is demonstrated by the higher savings proportion observed in the higher income group.
06

Illustrate with Budget Lines or Indifference Curves

Draw a budget line for a low-income individual and another for a high-income individual, showing possible allocations between savings and other goods. Higher income allows the budget line to shift outwards, increasing the opportunity to save.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Savings Behavior
Savings behavior refers to how individuals decide to allocate their income towards savings. This behavior can widely vary depending on various factors including income levels, financial goals, and personal preferences. In the context of a retirement savings program, we see that savings behavior is notably different between lower and higher income groups.
  • Lower-income individuals tend to have a lower participation rate in savings programs. This is often because they need to allocate a larger portion of their limited income towards essential expenses like food, housing, and transportation.
  • Higher-income individuals, on the other hand, have more flexibility in their budgets. After covering their necessary expenses, they have more discretionary income that they can choose to save for future needs like retirement.
Understanding savings behavior is key to designing effective financial programs and policies that encourage more people to save for the future.
Budget Constraint
A budget constraint represents the trade-offs a person faces between two or more goods, given their income. In this exercise, we consider savings and all other goods as the two goods. The budget constraint shows all possible combinations of how a person can allocate their income between these goods.
A key element of the budget constraint is that with higher income, the constraint shifts outward. This means that the person can afford more of both goods - savings and other consumable items.
  • For someone with lower income, their budget constraint is tighter, meaning they have less flexibility in how they allocate their money.
  • As income rises, individuals find it easier to participate in savings programs since they can satisfy their immediate needs and still have money left over to "buy" savings.
This relationship helps explain why higher-income groups have higher participation rates in savings programs.
Income Groups
Income groups categorize individuals based on their earnings, which influences their financial behavior. In this exercise, the income groups are separated into low-income earners (\(\(10,000-\)24,999\)) and high-income earners (more than \($100,000\)).This division allows us to observe trends and differences in financial priorities:
  • Lower-income groups often struggle to save due to the need to cover basic living expenses.
  • Higher-income groups, because they earn more, find it relatively easier to allocate a portion of their income to savings, as they have more disposable income.
These insights help policymakers and financial advisors tailor efforts to boost savings rates among different income groups by understanding their unique challenges and opportunities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Federal housing and food stamp subsidy programs are two of the largest in-kind transfer programs for the poor. President Barack Obama's 2011 budget allocated the Housing Choice Voucher Program \(\$ 19.6\) billion. Many poor people are eligible for both programs: \(30 \%\) of housing assistance recipients also used food stamps, and \(38 \%\) of food stamp program participants also received housing assistance (Harkness and Newman, 2003 ). Suppose Jill's income is \(\$ 500\) a month, which she spends on food and housing. The price of food and housing is each \(\$ 1\) per unit. Draw her budget line. If she receives \(\$ 150\) in food stamps and \(\$ 50\) in a housing subsidy (which she can spend only on housing \(),\) how do her budget line and opportunity set change?

Lorna consumes cans of anchovies, \(A\), and boxes of biscuits, \(B\). Each of her indifference curves reflects strictly diminishing marginal rates of substitution. Where \(A=8\) and \(B=6,\) her marginal rate of substitution between cans of anchovies and boxes of biscuits equals \(-2\left(=M U_{A} / M U_{B}\right) .\) Will she prefer a bundle with seven cans of anchovies and nine boxes of biscuits to her current bundle? Why? A

Which of the following pairs of goods are complements, which are substitutes, and which are unrelated? Are the goods that are substitutes likely to be perfect substitutes for some or all consumers? a. Pepsi and Coca-Cola b. \(A\) razor and a blade c. A Panasonic CD player and a JVC CD player d. Apple iPods and a TI financial calculators

Salvo and Huse (forthcoming) found that roughly one-fifth of flexible-fuel (cars that can run on a mix of ethanol and gasoline) car owners choose gasoline when the price of gas is \(20 \%\) above that of ethanol (in energy- adjusted terms) and, similarly, one-fifth of motorists choose ethanol when ethanol is \(20 \%\) more expensive than gasoline. What can you say about these people's tastes?

Don is altruistic. Show the possible shape of his indifference curves between charity and all other goods.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.