/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Explain why full employment may ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain why full employment may be inconsistent with no shirking.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Full employment removes the deterrent of losing a high-wage job, leading to potential shirking.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Shirking

Shirking refers to the scenario where employees do less work than they are supposed to because they cannot be monitored completely, and thus they believe they can avoid consequences.
02

Defining Full Employment

Full employment means that everyone willing and able to work at prevailing wage rates is employed. There are no involuntary job vacancies.
03

Analyze the No Shirking Condition

A key concept related to shirking is the efficiency wage theory, where employers pay above-market wages to motivate employees to work harder and reduce shirking. This means workers have an incentive not to shirk to avoid losing their job and the higher wage.
04

Identify the Inconsistency

Under full employment, there are no involuntary unemployed workers, meaning if someone is fired for shirking, they can immediately find another job. This reduces the incentive to avoid shirking because the cost of losing a job becomes negligible, as they wouldn't face a period of unemployment.
05

Conclusion

Thus, full employment can be inconsistent with no shirking because the threat of unemployment (which is a deterrent to shirking) is nonexistent. Employees may not be incentivized to limit shirking behavior if they know they can easily secure another job.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Shirking
Shirking occurs when employees perform less work than expected, exploiting the limitations of supervision. Workers might shirk because they assume they won't face negative consequences due to inadequate monitoring. Shirking becomes a concern for employers who want to ensure productivity and efficiency in the workplace. Since an employee can hide behind the lack of supervision, employers try to find methods to mitigate this behavior and enhance performance.
Efficiency Wage Theory
Efficiency wage theory proposes that employers willingly pay wages above the market level with the intent to boost worker productivity and discourage shirking. By offering higher wages, employees value their jobs more and tend to work harder to avoid losing them. The premium wage acts as an incentive for employees to increase their effort and reduce shirking. This approach benefits both the employer, through enhanced production, and the employee, through increased earnings.
  • Higher wages motivate workers to avoid the risk of losing their valuable job.
  • Employees feel more satisfied, which can lead to better performance.
Efficiency wages create a situation where the employer's investment in employees isn't just about compensation but a strategic tool to optimize productivity.
Involuntary Unemployment
Involuntary unemployment happens when people willing and able to work cannot find employment despite actively searching. This occurs even when the economy is thriving at 'full employment,' which doesn't mean a zero-unemployment rate but one where all unemployment is voluntary. Involuntary unemployment plays a significant role in maintaining the no shirking condition. When unemployment exists, the fear of joblessness prevents workers from shirking since finding another job might not be easy. However, in full employment scenarios, the threat of unemployment vanishes, leading employees to potentially feel less pressured to avoid shirking. Thus, involuntary unemployment acts as a critical deterrent to shirking, highlighting its importance in labor markets.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Traditionally, doctors have been paid on a fee-forservice basis. Now doctors are increasingly paid on a capitated basis (they get paid for treating a patient for a year, regardless of how much treatment is required), though a patient may still have to pay a small fee each visit. In this arrangement, doctors form a group and sign a capitation contract whereby they take turns seeing a given patient. What are the implications of this change in compensation for moral hazards and for risk bearing?

California set up its own earthquake insurance program. Because the state agency in charge has few staff members, it pays private insurance carriers to handle claims for earthquake damage. These insurance firms receive \(9 \%\) of each approved claim. Is this compensation scheme likely to lead to opportunistic behavior by insurance companies? If so, what would be a better way to handle the compensation?

As of \(2008,\) Medicare stopped covering the costs of a surgeon leaving an instrument in a patient, giving a patient transfusions of the wrong blood type, certain types of hospital-acquired infections, and other "preventable" mistakes (Liz Marlantes, "Medicare Won't Cover Hospital Mistakes: New Rules Aimed at Promoting Better Hospital Care and Safety," \(A B C\) News, August 19,2007 ). Hospitals now have to cover these costs and cannot bill the patient. These changes were designed to provide hospitals with a stronger incentive to prevent such mistakes, particularly infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that 2 million patients are annually infected in hospitals, costing society more than $27 billion. Nearly 100,000 of those infections are fatal. Many of these infections could be prevented if hospitals more rigorously follow basic infection control procedures, including having doctors and nurses wash their hands between every paticnt. Is Medicare's new policy designed to deal with adverse selection (Chapter 19 ) or moral hazard? Is it likely to help? Explain.

Some sellers offer to buy back a good later at some prespecified price. Why would a firm make such a commitment to deal with moral hazard concerns?

Many law firms consist of partners who share profits. On being made a partner, a lawyer must post a bond, a large payment to the firm that will be forfeited on bad behavior. Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.