/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 According to the digital media c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to the digital media company Captivate Network, employees viewing the 2012 Olympics instead of working caused a \(\$ 1.38\) billion loss in productivity for U.S. companies. Is this productivity loss an example of a negative externality? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, it is not a negative externality as it does not impose costs on third parties.

Step by step solution

01

Define Negative Externality

A negative externality occurs when an economic activity imposes a cost on unrelated third parties. This cost is not reflected in the market prices, and it typically results in overproduction or overconsumption of the activity causing the externality.
02

Analyze the Situation

In this scenario, employees watching the Olympics instead of working leads to a loss in productivity valued at $1.38 billion for U.S. companies. This situation involves costs that the companies have to bear due to employees' actions during work hours.
03

Determine Who is Affected

We need to consider whether the productivity loss imposes costs on parties who are not directly involved in the transaction. The primary parties involved are the employees and their employers. The loss directly affects the employers as it interferes with their business operations.
04

Conclusion on Externality

Since the productivity loss primarily affects the companies (employers) who are the direct parties associated with the employees, it does not impose a cost on external parties. Therefore, this productivity loss does not meet the criteria for a negative externality as it does not affect unrelated third parties.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Productivity Loss
Productivity loss occurs when there is a decrease in the amount of work produced in a given amount of time. In the context of businesses, this can happen when employees are distracted by non-work-related activities. For instance, during significant events like the Olympics, employees might spend more time watching events rather than focusing on their tasks, thereby reducing their output.

Productivity loss can be a major issue for companies as it directly impacts their overall efficiency and profitability. In financial terms, this can translate into revenue losses or increased costs to make up for the shortfall in work output.
  • Causes of productivity loss can include distractions, lack of motivation, inadequate tools or resources, and managerial inefficiencies.
  • A $1.38 billion loss due to employees watching the Olympics exemplifies how non-work activities during business hours can significantly impact productivity.
Addressing productivity loss typically involves understanding its root causes and implementing strategies to minimize distractions, enhance work environments, and motivate employees.
Economic Activity
Economic activity involves the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services in an economy. It is a measure of how actively resources are being used and can provide insight into the health of the economy.

The dynamics of economic activity are often influenced by various factors, including consumer behavior, governmental policies, and global events. For example, significant sporting events like the Olympics can inadvertently influence economic activity as they capture public and employee attention.
  • Economic activity is central to understanding how different sectors of the economy interact and how resources are allocated.
  • Distractions in the workplace, such as watching the Olympics, can decrease employee productivity, thereby impacting economic activity negatively in terms of work output.
This decrease in productivity can trickle down to affect overall economic growth if widespread and unchecked.
Third Parties
When talking about negative externalities, third parties refer to those who are indirectly affected by an economic activity. In essence, they are not directly involved in the decision-making process or transactions that lead to these externalities.

However, in situations where productivity loss is confined to the internal environment of a company, such as when employees are less efficient due to watching the Olympics, only direct stakeholders (the employer and employee) are impacted. This does not involve third parties because the consequences are borne solely by the employer who experiences reduced productivity.
  • Examples of third parties in other scenarios include local communities affected by pollution from nearby factories or drivers affected by traffic congestions due to a nearby construction project.
  • Understanding who constitutes a third party is crucial in analyzing whether an economic activity results in a negative externality.
In the case of the Olympic distraction, there is no impact on third parties, distinguishing it from classic examples of negative externalities.
Market Prices
Market prices represent the value at which goods or services are bought and sold in a marketplace. They are determined by the interaction of supply and demand and reflect the willingness of consumers to pay and the cost of production.

Negative externalities occur when the costs of an activity are not fully accounted for in the market prices. For instance, environmental damage from industrial activities often does not appear in the pricing of products, making them cheaper than they should be.
  • Market prices are integral to understanding economic systems as they signal information to buyers and sellers, helping resource allocation.
  • In the case of the Olympics, the $1.38 billion productivity loss is not reflected in market prices because it is a cost borne internally by companies, not affecting broader market dynamics.
Thus, losses such as decreased employee productivity due to distractions do not meet the criteria for being a negative externality, as they are not externalized onto the broader public or unrelated economic actors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two tenants of a mall are protected by the guard service, \(q .\) The number of guards per hour demanded by the television store is \(q_{1}=a_{1}+b_{1} p\),where \(p\) is the price of one hour of guard services. The ice-cream store's demand is \(q_{2}=a_{2}+b_{2} p\). What is the social demand for this service? \(A\)

Why is zero pollution not the best solution for society? Can there be too little pollution? Why or why not?

If global warming occurs, output of three of the major U.S. cash crops could decline by as much as \(80 \%\) according to Roberts and Schenkler (2012). Crop yields increase on days when the temperature rises above \(50^{\circ}\), but fall precipitously on days when it is above \(86^{\circ} .\) Given this relationship between agricultural output and temperature and that this agricultural effect is the only externality from global warming, what would be the government's optimal policy if it can predictably control pollution and hence temperature? Can you use either a \(\operatorname{tax}\) or an emissions standard to achieve your optimal policy? How does your policy recommendation change if the government is uncertain about its ability to control pollution and temperature or there are other externalities?

Northern Victoria, Australia, imposed a vomit tax on pubs in the Greater Shepparton area that remain open between 3: 00 A.M. and 6: 00 A.M. The tax was to be used to pay for cleaning up the mess left by drunks who get sick in the street. Pub owners objected that politicians assume that their customers are responsible for the mess. Discuss the pros and cons of using such a tax to deal with this externality.

You and your roommate have a stack of dirty dishes in the sink. Either of you would wash the dishes if the decision were up to you; however, neither will do it in the expectation (hope?) that the other will deal with the mess. Explain how this example illustrates the problem of public goods and free riding.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.