/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 The federal government would lik... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The federal government would like everyone to have access to health insurance. Currently, the government allows insurance companies to test an applicant's smoking status (they can test a blood sample for nicotine), but does not allow insurers to use the results of any genetic tests. Explain why these seemingly inconsistent provisions are both consistent with the government's goal.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Allows accurate risk assessment for behavior but ensures fairness by prohibiting genetic discrimination.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Smoking Status Testing

The government permits insurance companies to test an applicant's smoking status because smoking is a voluntary behavior that directly influences health risk and healthcare costs. By allowing this testing, insurance companies can accurately assess risk, leading to fair pricing and maintaining insurance market stability.
02

Genetic Testing Prohibition

The prohibition on using genetic test results ensures that individuals are not penalized for genetic factors beyond their control that may predispose them to certain health conditions. This aligns with the goal of promoting equitable access to health insurance by preventing discrimination based on inherent, non-modifiable characteristics.
03

Balancing Risk Assessment and Fairness

Allowing smoking status testing while prohibiting genetic testing achieves a balance between accurately assessing risk for behaviors individuals can change and ensuring fairness for genetic differences individuals cannot control. Thus, it supports universal health insurance access without unfairly discriminating against certain groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Smoking and Health Risks
Smoking poses significant health risks due to its association with numerous diseases. These include lung cancer, heart disease, and emphysema.
Each of these illnesses not only affects the quality of life but also incurs substantial medical costs.
This connection between smoking and health risks is why the government allows insurance companies to assess smoking status through nicotine tests.
Insurance companies can use this information to adjust premiums, making sure they reflect the increased risk and potential healthcare costs.
  • Smoking is a voluntary action that individuals can choose to stop, which differs from genetic predispositions.
  • The health risks related to smoking are well-documented, making it an essential factor in evaluating overall health risk.
  • By testing for nicotine, insurers aim to ensure that premiums are fair, equitable, and aligned with an individual's health-related behavior.
This approach stabilizes the insurance market by ensuring that costs are shared appropriately among those who pose higher health risks due to lifestyle choices.
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination
Genetic information nondiscrimination is crucial for ensuring fairness in health insurance coverage. This concept revolves around the idea that individuals should not be penalized for genetic traits they inherit and cannot change.
Genetic predispositions to certain diseases do not stem from personal choices nor lifestyle decisions.
Thus, utilizing genetic test results to determine health insurance eligibility or premiums would be unjust.
  • Genetic factors cannot be modified by the individual, making them an inappropriate basis for risk assessment in insurance.
  • Everyone deserves equal access to health insurance, irrespective of their genetic makeup.
  • The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) reinforces this by protecting individuals from being denied health insurance or charged higher rates based on their genetic information.
This ensures that all individuals, regardless of their genetic background, have access to fair health coverage, aligning with the goal of equitable healthcare access.
Risk Assessment and Insurance Equity
Balancing risk assessment with insurance equity involves ensuring that insurance practices are fair while also maintaining market viability.
By allowing smoking tests but prohibiting genetic testing, the government aims to achieve this balance.
Insurers can better estimate risks associated with lifestyle choices, like smoking, which individuals have control over, while protecting from discrimination based on unchangeable genetic factors.
  • This balance ensures that individuals are incentivized to make healthier lifestyle choices, potentially lowering their healthcare costs.
  • It prevents insurance companies from exploiting genetic information, which could lead to unfair treatment of policyholders based on characteristics they cannot change.
  • The approach helps stabilize premiums across populations by spreading costs more equitably among those with lifestyle risks rather than genetic predispositions.
By focusing on modifiable risks for assessment, insurance can be both fair and financially sustainable, ultimately promoting universal access to health insurance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Most workplaces are subject to federal minimum wage guidelines, but restaurants are not. Currently, restaurant owners are required to pay waiters and waitresses only \(\$ 2.13\) per hour, provided that those servers are eligible to receive tips. a. Explain how this pay scheme (low minimum plus tips) resolves a principal- agent problem for restaurant owners. b. Explain how this pay scheme may backfire by creating a different principal- agent problem for restaurant owners.

Auto insurer Progressive Insurance recently implemented a new program. Policyholders who agree to voluntarily install a Snapshot telematics device in their car receive a small discount on their car insurance premium. The Snapshot device records distance, time of day, speed, and hard braking activity in much the same way as an airplane's black box, and reports that information to Progressive. Customers with good driving habits receive a substantial discount on their insurance; those with bad habits may see their premiums increase. a. Explain how the Snapshot device helps Progressive overcome adverse selection. b. Explain how the Snapshot device helps Progressive overcome moral hazard.

Suppose that there are two types of workers in the world: Charlie Hustles, who are high-productivity workers, and Lazy Susans, who are low-productivity workers. The market would pay \(\$ 70,000\) (this and all numbers in this question are in present value terms) to hire a Charlie Hustle, but only \(\$ 20,000\) to hire a Lazy Susan. The problem, of course, is that a firm cannot tell on sight whether a job applicant is a Charlie or a Susan. One way to attempt to separate the Chucks and the Suzies is to require a college degree. It is easy for a Charlie Hustle to obtain a degree (the degree takes four years to complete and costs \(\$ 40,000\) in total). It is harder for a Lazy Susan to obtain a degree (six years and a cost of \(\$ 60,000\) ). Assume that a college education adds nothing to either worker's productivity. a. If the company, operating blindly with no degree requirements, were to pay an average wage of \(\$ 45,000,\) what would most of its applicants look like? b. Suppose that the company announces that it will pay \(\$ 70,000\) to those with college degrees, and \(\$ 20,000\) to those without. What is the net benefit of a college education to a Charlie? To a Susan? Does the degree requirement allow the firm to filter out low-quality applicants? c. Suppose that a new federal subsidy to assist low-productivity workers reduces the cost of obtaining a degree to \(\$ 46,000 .\) What is the net benefit of a college education to a Charlie? To a Susan? Does the degree requirement allow the firm to filter out low-quality applicants? d. In light of your answers to (b) and (c), discuss the following assertion: To be effective, a signal must be costly, but it must be more costly for a low-productivity applicant. e. Colleges and universities have been accused of practicing grade inflation. In fact, some colleges have actually outlawed awarding a grade of "F." Given your answer to (d), discuss the impact of this practice on the signaling value of a college diploma. Is this practice good for students? Does your answer depend on the quality of the student? Explain.

After years of training, Sara has landed a contract playing professional lacrosse. Eager to leverage her pro status by bringing in endorsements, she asks Jenny MacGuire to be her personal manager. Jenny has offered Sara a choice of two payment plans. Sara can engage Jenny's services for a flat fee of \(\$ 100,000\). Alternatively, Sara can pay Jenny \(15 \%\) of all endorsement revenue. Sara estimates that if Jenny expends modest effort ( \(\$ 20,000\) worth) in her job, she will generate \(\$ 600,000\) in endorsement revenue for Sara. But if Jenny expends high effort ( \(\$ 50,000\) worth), she will bring in \(\$ 1\) million in endorsements. a. Suppose Sara agrees to the flat-rate plan. What can Sara expect to receive if Jenny expends modest effort? If Jenny expends high effort? What can Jenny expect to receive in either case? Explain the associated principal-agent problem. Who is the principal? Who is the agent? b. For both possible effort levels, determine the rewards to Jenny and Sara if Sara chooses the \(15 \%\) plan. What happens to the principal-agent problem if Sara chooses this plan?

After a probationary period of six years, during which they teach, research, and serve on committees, university professors who meet acceptable standards are given tenure. Tenure offers these professors tremendous job security. a. Explain why a tenure system makes universities susceptible to a moral hazard problem. b. Explain why the problems of moral hazard caused by tenure are likely to be greater than the problems of adverse selection.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.