/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 When competition between firms i... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

When competition between firms is based on quantities (Cournot competition), the reaction functions we derive tell us that when Firm A increases its output, Firm B's best response is to cut its own. However, when competition between firms is based on price (Bertrand competition), reaction functions tell us that Firm B's response to a cut in Firm A's price (which will lead to an increase in the quantity A sells) should be a corresponding cut in B's price (and a corresponding increase in its own output). Reconcile these two results.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In Cournot, firms adjust quantities to stabilize prices; in Bertrand, firms adjust prices to influence quantities. The end goal in both is optimal profit.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Cournot Competition

In Cournot competition, firms choose quantities of output simultaneously. If Firm A increases its output, it affects the market price negatively, leading to a lower price. Firm B's optimal reaction is to reduce its output to avoid further decreasing the market price and harming its own profits because higher total market output leads to lower prices, hurting firms' profits.
02

Understand Bertrand Competition

In Bertrand competition, firms compete by setting prices. If Firm A cuts its price, it becomes more attractive to consumers, increasing its market share and quantity sold. In response, Firm B must also reduce its price to maintain competitiveness and retain its market share, otherwise it risks losing customers to Firm A.
03

Reconcile Cournot and Bertrand Reactions

The essential difference lies in the mode of competition: quantity vs. price. In Cournot, firms react to changes in output to influence and stabilize prices, focusing more on production levels. Meanwhile, in Bertrand, firms react to changes in prices, automatically affecting their output to ensure they remain competitive, focusing heavily on consumer price sensitivity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cournot Competition
In Cournot competition, two or more firms decide on the amount of output they will produce, and they make these decisions simultaneously without knowing the choices of the other competitors. Here, each firm considers the output level of its competitor as given and then decides its production quantity to maximize its own profit.
This competition model is characterized by the **interdependence** of firms, making strategic thinking essential. When one firm decides to increase its output, the market supply goes up, causing a decrease in market prices. This ultimately reduces potential profits for all players involved. Consequently, **reaction functions** are crucial, helping each firm determine its best course of action in response to competitors. Firm B's strategy to reduce its production will naturally follow if Firm A increases production, stabilizing the market conditions and maintaining profitability.
Bertrand Competition
In stark contrast to Cournot competition, Bertrand competition involves firms competing on price rather than quantity. Within this framework, each firm independently chooses a product price, with the primary objective of capturing a greater market share. The assumption here is that consumers gravitate towards the cheaper option among comparable products, pushing firms towards aggressive price setting strategies.
If Firm A decides to lower its price, it effectively attracts a larger customer base due to its more attractive pricing. Firm B, seeking to stay competitive, is prompted to lower its price as well, leading to the proverbial price war. Consequently, **reaction functions** in Bertrand models revolve around price adjustments rather than output changes, stressing adaptability in pricing to capture and sustain consumer interest. This highlights the firm's focus not just on its production volumes but more significantly on its price positioning to outmaneuver its competitors.
Reaction Functions
Reaction functions represent the strategic moves firms make in response to competitors' actions, playing a vital role in competitive scenarios. In Cournot competition, a firm's reaction function will define the quantity it believes it should produce based on the quantity produced by its competitor. This forms a feedback loop where each firm adjusts to the other's output, keeping market equilibrium and ensuring firms aim towards maximizing profits while suppressing excessive market supply.
In Bertrand competition, reaction functions are centered around pricing. When one firm changes its price, the reaction function dictates how the competitor will alter its own prices to remain viable in the marketplace. Both competition models illuminate different facets of strategic decision-making: one skews towards optimizing production quantities, while the other leans heavily on pricing tactics to remain consumer-relevant. Recognizing these action-reaction dynamics is key in studying game theory and understanding how distinct competitive landscapes shape business strategies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is a cartel that attempts to keep oil prices high by restricting output. As part of that process, each member nation is assigned a production quota; most members have nationalized their oil industry so that the government controls overall production. However, member nations routinely exceed their production targets. Read "What Makes Collusion Easier" in Section 11.2 ; then explain why OPEC often has difficulty keeping output low and prices high. Do you think that violators are more likely to emerge from politically stable countries or unstable countries? From monarchies or democracies?

August and François are the only sellers of sparkling water at a market in a small, rural French town. They obtain their sparkling water for free from wells in their backyards and transport it to the market in wheelbarrows; neither has access to motorized transportation. Identify the type of oligopoly (Cournot, Bertrand, Stackelberg) that is the best fit for each situation below and explain your reasoning: a. August and François both live 4 hours' walk from the market. b. August and François both live half a block from the market. c. August lives a long walk away, but is an early riser who always arrives at 8:00 A.M.; François lives quite close and never shows up until 8: 30 .

Because cooking soufflés is incredibly difficult, the supply of soufflés in a small French town is controlled by two bakers, Gaston and Pierre. The demand for soufflés is given by \(P=30-2 Q\), and the marginal and average total cost of producing soufflés is \(\$ 6 .\) Because baking a soufflé requires a great deal of work and preparation, each morning Gaston and Pierre make a binding decision about how many soufflés to bake. a. Suppose that Pierre and Gaston agree to collude, evenly splitting the output a monopolist would make and charging the monopoly price. i. Derive the equation for the monopolist's marginal revenue curve. ii. Determine the profit-maximizing collective output for the cartel. iii. Determine the price Pierre and Gaston will be able to charge. iv. Determine profits for Pierre and Gaston individually, as well as for the cartel as a whole. b. Suppose that Pierre cheats on the cartel agreement by baking one extra soufflé each morning. i. What does the extra production do to the price of soufflés in the marketplace? ii. Calculate Pierre's profit. How much did he gain by cheating? iii Calculate Gaston's profit. How much did Pierre's cheating cost him? iv. How much potential profit does the group lose as a result of Pierre's cheating? c. Suppose that Gaston, fed up with Pierre's behavior, also begins baking one extra soufflé each morning. i. How does the extra production affect the price of soufflés in the marketplace? ii. Calculate Gaston's profit. How much did he gain by cheating? iii Calculate Pierre's profit. How much did Gaston's cheating cost him? iv. How much potential profit does the group lose as a result of Pierre's and Gaston's cheating? v. Demonstrate that it is in neither Pierre's nor Gaston's best interest to cheat further on their agreement.

Consider two Bertrand competitors in the market for brie, François and Babette. The cheeses of François and Babette are differentiated, with the demand for François' cheese given by \(q_{F}=30-p_{F}+p_{B}\) where, \(q_{F}\) is the quantity François sells, \(p_{F}\) is the price François charges, and \(p_{B}\) is the price charged by Babette. The demand for Babette's cheese is similarly given as \(q_{B}=30-p_{B}+p_{F}\) Assume that the marginal cost of producing cheese is zero. a. Find the Bertrand equilibrium prices and quantities for these two competitors. b. Now consider a situation in which François sets his price first and Babette responds. Follow procedures similar to those you used for Stackelberg quantity competition to solve for François's profit-maximizing price, quantity, and profit. c. Solve for Babette's profit-maximizing price, quantity, and profit. d. Was François's attempt to seize the first-mover advantage worthwhile?

Internet users in a small Colorado town can access the Web in two ways: via their television cable or via a digital subscriber line (DSL) from their telephone company. The cable and telephone companies are Bertrand competitors, but because changing providers is slightly costly (waiting for the cable repairman can eat up at least small amounts of time!), customers have some slight resistance to switching from one to another. The demand for cable Internet services is given by \(q_{C}=100-3 p_{C}+2 p_{T}\), where \(q_{C}\) is the number of cable Internet subscribers in town, \(p_{C}\) is the monthly price of cable Internet service, and \(p_{T}\) is the price of a DSL line from the telephone company. The demand for DSL Internet service is similarly given by \(q_{T}=100-3 p_{T}+2 p_{C}\) Assume that both sellers can produce broadband service at zero marginal cost. a. Derive the cable company's reaction curve. Your answer should express \(p_{C}\) as a function of \(p_{T}\) b. Derive the telephone company's reaction curve. Your answer should express \(p_{T}\) as a function of \(p_{C}\). c. Combine reaction functions to determine the price each competitor should charge. Then determine each competitor's quantity and profits, assuming that the average total costs are zero. d. Suppose that the cable company begins to offer slightly faster service than the telephone company, which alters demands for the two products. Now \(q_{C}=100-2 p_{C}+3 p_{T}\) and \(q_{T}=100-4 p_{T}+p_{C}\) Show what effect this increase in service has on the prices and profit of each competitor.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.