/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3. During the recession of 2007–2... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

During the recession of 2007–2009, the U.S. federal government’s tax collections fell from about \(2.6 trillion down to about \)2.1 trillion while GDP declined by about 4 percent. Does the U.S. tax system appear to have built-in stabilizers?

  1. Yes

  2. No

Short Answer

Expert verified

Option (a): Yes

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of built-in stabilizers

Built-in stabilizers are the part of fiscal policy which automatically adjusts to stabilize the economy. These are collectively referred to as the non-discretionary fiscal policy. A non-discretionary fiscal policy includes taxes and transfer payments.

Taxes vary according to the fluctuations in GDP, and transfer payments move in the opposite direction to GDP. During economic expansion, an economy receives greater tax revenues and reduces transfer payments. In contrast, the tax revenues shrink, and transfer payments expand during economic contraction.

02

Explanation for the answer

During the recession of 2007-2009, the GDP of the US declined by about 4%.The US economy has a progressive tax system. As the GDP increases, the tax rate increases with an increasing rate. As a reaction to the decline in GDP, the tax revenues declined from about $2.6 trillion to about $2.1 trillion. Thus, the decline in taxes automatically came into action to stabilize the economy.

The decline in tax revenues stimulates aggregate consumption expenditure as it saves the disposable income of households. Therefore, it can be concluded that the US tax system has built-in stabilizers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer back to the table in Figure 12.7 in the previous chapter. Suppose that aggregate demand increases such that the amount of real output demanded rises by \(7 billion at each price level. By what percentage will the price level increase? Will this inflation be demand-pull inflation, or will it be cost-push inflation? If potential real GDP (that is, full-employment GDP) is \)510 billion, what will be the size of the positive GDP gap after the change in aggregate demand? If government wants to use fiscal policy to counter the resulting inflation without changing tax rates, would it increase government spending or decrease it?

Real Output Demanded (Billions)
Price Level (Index Number)

Real Output Supplied (Billions)
\(506
108\)513
508104512
510100510
51296507
51492502

In January, the interest rate is 5 percent and firms borrow \(50 billion per month for investment projects. In February, the federal government doubles its monthly borrowing from \)25 billion to \(50 billion, driving the interest rate up to 7 percent. As a result, firms cut back their borrowing to only \)30 billion per month. Which of the following is true?

  1. There is no crowding-out effect because the government’s increase in borrowing exceeds firms’ decrease in borrowing.

  2. There is a crowding-out effect of \(20 billion.

  3. There is no crowding-out effect because both the government and firms are still borrowing a lot.

  4. There is a crowding-out effect of \)25 billion.

What happens between the public and private sectors during a "crowding out" effect?

Briefly state and evaluate the problem of time lags in enacting and applying fiscal policy. Explain the idea of a political business cycle. How might expectations of a near-term policy reversal weaken fiscal policy based on changes in tax rates? What is the crowding-out effect, and why might it be relevant to fiscal policy?

Refer to the following table for Waxwania:

What is the marginal tax rate in Waxwania? The average tax rate? Which of the following describes the tax system: proportional, progressive, or regressive?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.