/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11. Trace the cause-and-effect chain... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Trace the cause-and-effect chain through which financing and refinancing of the public debt might affect real interest rates, private investment, the capital stock, and economic growth. How might investment in public capital and public-private complementarities alter the outcome of the cause-effect chain?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The crowding-out effect by public debt will increase the real interest rate, reduce private investment, stock of capital, and economic growth.

Investment in public capital increases the availability of public stock for future generations, repairing the economic loss by the crowding-out effect. Investment in public-private complementarities increases the public and private investments simultaneously, which eliminates the crowding-out effect.

Step by step solution

01

Cause-and-effect chain of public debt

When the government falls short of the funds, it opts for debt. The public debt can be for productive purposes or to settle the preceding debts.The increase in public debts raises the interest rate, crowding out private investment.

A decline in private investment lowers the stock of capital and aggregate spending of the economy. A smaller aggregate spending will hamper economic growth.

02

Alteration of the outcome of the cause-and-effect chain

Investment in public capital such as transportation, health, education, or any other physical or social infrastructure creates excessive production capacity in the economy in the future.It repairs the economic loss caused by the crowding-out effect.

Public-private complementarities can reduce the crowding-out impact of private investment.If the public debt is used for productive purposes, increasing the demand for private investment, the private and public investments will grow simultaneously, flourishing the economic growth.

For instance, the government invests the public debt in setting up new hospitals in an underdeveloped area. It will encourage private investment for setting up pathologies, medical and other shops, hotels, and restaurants in the area.

Therefore, the public and private investments will complement each other, and the economy will experience growth.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What do economists mean when they say Social Security and Medicare are 鈥減ay-as-you-go鈥 plans? What are the Social Security and Medicare trust funds, and how long will they have money left in them? What is the key long-run problem of both Social Security and Medicare? To fix the problem, do you favor increasing taxes or do you prefer reducing benefits?

The economy is in a recession. A congresswoman suggests increasing spending to stimulate aggregate demand and raising taxes simultaneously to pay for the increased spending. Her suggestion to combine higher government expenditures with higher taxes is

  1. the worst possible combination of tax and expenditure changes.

  2. the best possible combination of tax and expenditure changes.

  3. a mediocre and contradictory combination of tax and expenditure changes.

Use the aggregate expenditures model to show how government fiscal policy could eliminate either a recessionary expenditure gap or an inflationary expenditure gap (Figure 11.7). Explain how equal-size increases in G and T could eliminate a recessionary gap and how equal-size decreases in G and T could eliminate an inflationary gap.

Refer back to the table in Figure 12.7 in the previous chapter. Suppose that aggregate demand increases such that the amount of real output demanded rises by \(7 billion at each price level. By what percentage will the price level increase? Will this inflation be demand-pull inflation, or will it be cost-push inflation? If potential real GDP (that is, full-employment GDP) is \)510 billion, what will be the size of the positive GDP gap after the change in aggregate demand? If government wants to use fiscal policy to counter the resulting inflation without changing tax rates, would it increase government spending or decrease it?

Real Output Demanded (Billions)
Price Level (Index Number)

Real Output Supplied (Billions)
\(506
108\)513
508104512
510100510
51296507
51492502

True or false? If false, explain why.

  1. The total public debt is more relevant to an economy than the public debt as a percentage of GDP.

  2. An internally held public debt is like a debt of the left hand owed to the right hand.

  3. The Federal Reserve and federal government agencies hold more than three-fourths of the public debt.

  4. As a percentage of GDP, the total US public debt is the highest such debt among the world鈥檚 advanced industrial nations.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.