/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q1. Suppose that the money supply an... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that the money supply and the nominal GDP for a hypothetical economy are \(96 billion and \)336 billion, respectively. What is the velocity of money? How will households and businesses react if the central bank reduces the money supply by $20 billion? By how much will nominal GDP have to fall to restore equilibrium, according to the monetarist perspective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The velocity of money is 3.5.

The households will reduce the purchase, and the businesses will reduce the sales when the central bank reduces the money supply.

The nominal GDP will have to fall by $70 billion to restore equilibrium.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The monetarists have given the following equation of exchange:

MoneySupply×Velocity=NominalGDP96×Velocity=336Velocity=33696=3.5

So, the velocity of the money is 3.5.

02

Explanation for part (b)

When the central bank reduces the money supply, the equilibrium output in the economy shrinks. The interest rate will increase due to the money supply so that the investment will become costlier, and businesses will produce less. The higher interest rate incentivizes the households to invest rather than spend. Hence, the purchase by the households reduces.

03

Explanation for part (c)

A reduction in money supply by $76 billion will reduce the GDP by $70 billion.

Inserting this new value into the earlier exchange equation:

76×3.5=NominalGDPNominalGDP=266

The decrease in the nominal GDP is 336 – 266 = $70 billion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume the following information for a hypothetical economy in year 1: money supply = $400 billion; long-term annual growth of potential GDP = 3 percent; velocity = 4. Assume that the banking system initially has no excess reserves and that the reserve requirement is 10 percent. Also suppose that velocity is constant and that the economy initially is operating at its full-employment real output.

  1. What is the level of nominal GDP in year 1?

  2. Suppose the Fed adheres to a monetary rule through open-market operations. What amount of U.S. securities will it have to sell to, or buy from, banks or the public between years 1 and 2 to meet its monetary rule?

You have just been elected president of the United States, and the present chair of the Federal Reserve Board has resigned. You need to appoint a new person to this position, as well as a person to chair your Council of Economic Advisers. Using Table 19.1 and your knowledge of macroeconomics, identify the views on macro theory and policy you would want your appointees to hold. Remember, the economic health of the entire nation—and your chances for reelection—may depend on your selection.

Use an AD-AS graph to demonstrate and explain the price-level and real-output outcome of an anticipated decline in aggregate demand, as viewed by RET economists. (Assume that the economy initially is operating at its full-employment level of output.) Then demonstrate and explain on the same graph the outcome as viewed by mainstream economists.

According to mainstream economists, what is the usual cause of macroeconomic instability? What role does the spending-income multiplier play in creating instability? How might adverse aggregate supply factors cause instability, according to mainstream economists?

Compare and contrast the market monetarist 5-percent target for nominal GDP growth with the older, simpler monetary rule advocated by Milton Friedman.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.