/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q7. Is the relationship between chan... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is the relationship between changes in spending and changes in real GDP in the multiplier effect a direct (positive) relationship, or is it an inverse (negative) relationship? How does the size of the multiplier relate to the size of the MPC? The MPS? What is the logic of the multiplier-MPC relationship?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The changes in spending and the changes in real GDP have a positive relationship in the multiplier effect.

The larger the size of MPC, the larger the multiplier will be, and vice versa.

The larger the size of MPS, the smaller the multiplier will be, and vice versa.

Multiplier and MPC are positively related; the greater the MPC value, the greater the consumption expenditure will be, and, thus, the greater will be the increase in real GDP.

Step by step solution

01

Relationship between the changes in spending and changes in real GDP

A multiplier gives the proportion of change in real GDP due to a unit change in spending.A change in spending induces a change in real GDP. The following formula gives the multiplier effect:

â–³Y=kâ–³I, where k is the multiplier.

The above formula shows that the change in real GDP is positively related to the change in spending. For example, if the change in investment is $2000 and MPC is 0.1, then the change in income will be $200 (2000×0.1).

02

Relation between the multiplier and the MPC

Since the multiplier is the effect of change in total spending, a larger MPC means greater income generation through private consumption. Therefore, the multiplier has a positive relation with MPC.

Therefore, for the large size of the multiplier, the MPC should be large.

k=â–³Yâ–³Spendingk=â–³Y1-MPCâ–³Yk=11-MPC

Thus, the multiplier is directly related to MPC.

03

Relation between the multiplier and the MPS

The multiplier effect measures the result of changes in expenditure components on the income. A smaller MPS means larger spending through private consumption and a higher increase in the real GDP. Therefore, the multiplier is inversely related to MPS.

k=â–³Yâ–³Ik=â–³YMPSâ–³Yk=1MPS

04

Logic for multiplier and MPC relationship

MPC measures the propensity to consume out of a unit increase in income. The greater the value of MPC, the greater proportion of the income will be consumed. Greater consumption expenditure will result in greater demand for goods and services and will encourage firms to increase production and investment. An investment increase will further encourage the demand by distributing higher income in society.

Thus, the increase in GDP is higher than before (when the MPC was smaller). The multiplier effect is greater due to the higher MPC value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In year 1, Adam earns \(1,000 and saves \)100. In year 2, Adam gets a \(500 raise so that he earns a total of \)1,500. Out of that \(1,500, he saves \)200. What is Adam’s MPC out of his $500 raise?

  1. 0.50

  2. 0.75

  3. 0.80

  4. 1.00

In what direction will each of the following occurrences shift the investment demand curve, other things equal?

  1. An increase in unused production capacity occurs.

  2. Business taxes decline.

  3. The cost of acquiring equipment falls.

  4. Widespread pessimism arises about future business conditions and sales revenues.

  5. A major new technological breakthrough creates prospects for a wide range of profitable new products.

Assume there are no investment projects in the economy that yield an expected rate of return of 25 percent or more. But suppose there are \(10 billion of investment projects yielding expected returns of between 20 and 25 percent; another \)10 billion yielding between 15 and 20 percent; another $10 billion between 10 and 15 percent; and so forth. Cumulate these data and present them graphically, putting the expected rate of return (and the real interest rate) on the vertical axis and the amount of investment on the horizontal axis. What will be the equilibrium level of aggregate investment if the real interest rate is (a) 15 percent, (b) 10 percent, and (c) 5 percent?

Linear equations for the consumption and saving schedules take the general form C = a + bY and S = − a + (1 − b)Y, where C, S, and Y are consumption, saving, and national income, respectively. The constant a represents the vertical intercept, and b represents the slope of the consumption schedule.

a. Use the following data to substitute numerical values for a and b in the consumption and saving equations.

National Income (Y)Consumption (C)
\(080
100140
200200
300260
400320

b. What is the economic meaning of b? Of (1 − b)?

c. Suppose that the amount of saving that occurs at each level of national income falls by \)20 but that the values of b and (1 − b) remain unchanged. Restate the saving and consumption equations inserting the new numerical values, and cite a factor that might have caused the change.

In what direction will each of the following occurrences shift the consumption and saving schedules, other things equal?

  1. A large decrease in real estate values, including private homes.
  2. A sharp, sustained increase in stock prices.
  3. A 5-year increase in the minimum age for collecting Social Security benefits.
  4. An economywide expectation that a recession is over and that a robust expansion will occur.
  5. A substantial increase in household borrowing to finance auto purchases.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.