/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3. Has economic output always grown... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Has economic output always grown faster than the population? When did modern economic growth begin? Have all of the world’s nations experienced the same extent of modern economic growth?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  • No, the economic output does not always grow faster than the population.
  • Modern economic growth started after the industrial revolution
  • No, all nations have not experienced the same extent of modern economic growth.

Step by step solution

01

Relation between economic output and population

Historians believed that the standard of living in ancient times saw no or minimal growth over many decades. They calculated that the standard of living of a peasant in the year 100 A.D. is similar to the peasant living in the year 1400 A.D. It is so because the output growth was similar to the growth of population until the industrial revolution in the 18th century.

Based on this conclusion, it is concluded that economic output has not always grown faster than population. The growth was similar before the industrial revolution.

02

The year of modern economic growth

Economists believed that modern economic growth started after the industrial revolution in the 18th century. The industrial revolution initiated factory production. It also encouraged research and development in an extensive manner which brought new technologies for production.

The development of new production technologies after the industrial revolution increased the output per person. The economic growth started to grow at a faster rate than the population. Hence, the modern economic growth happened in the 18th century after the industrial revolution.

03

Expansion modern economic growth in different countries.

Countries of Europe and the USA experienced modern economic growth after the industrial revolution at an early stage. It implies that they have been experiencing modern economic growth for a much longer time. Asian and African countries are those where the modern economic growth reached later and have experienced fewer years of economic growth.

The nations which experienced the modern economic growth at the early phase are more developed than the nations where the modern economic growth reached later. The difference in the standard of living between rich and developing countries shows that the entire world’s nations did not experience the benefits of modern economic growth at the same time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why, in general, do shocks force people to make changes? Give at least two examples from your own experience.

Consider a nation in which the volume of goods and services is growing by 5 percent per year. What is the likely impact of this high rate of growth on the power and influence of its government relative to other countries experiencing slower rates of growth? How will this 5 percent growth rate likely affect the nation’s living standards? Will the standard of living grow by 5 percent per year, given population growth? Why or why not?

Catalog companies are committed to selling at the prices printed in their catalogs. If a catalog company finds its inventory of sweaters rising, what does that tell you about the demand for sweaters? Was it unexpectedly high, unexpectedly low, or as expected? If the company could change the price of sweaters, would it raise the price, lower the price, or keep the price the same? Given that the company cannot change the price of sweaters, however, consider the number of sweaters it orders each month from the company that manufactures the sweaters. If inventories become very high, will the catalog company increase orders, decrease orders, or keep orders the same? Given what the catalog company does with its orders, what is likely to happen to employment and output at the sweater manufacturer?

True or False. Because price stickiness matters only in the short run, economists are comfortable using just one macroeconomic model for all situations.

How does investment as defined by economists differ from investment as defined by the general public? What would happen to the amount of economic investment made today if firms expect the future returns to such investment to be very low? What would happen to the amount of economic investment today if firms expect future returns to be very high?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.