/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q1. Why do you think macroeconomists... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Why do you think macroeconomists focus on just a few key statistics when trying to understand the health and trajectory of an economy? Would it be better to try to examine all possible data? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Key statistics such as real GDP, unemployment, and inflation impacts the whole economy and are vital indicators of the health of any economy. These few statistics are easy to process compared to using a number of different economic statistics.

No, it will not be feasible to examine all data because studying and examining all possible data would be time-consuming, expensive, and highly cumbersome. The outcome will be the same but time and resources would be greater.

Step by step solution

01

Reason behind using key statistics for understanding the health and trajectory of an economy.

Factors such as GDP, unemployment rate, and inflation are key statistics that are used to show the health and trajectory of an economy. These are macroeconomics concept that studies the economy as a whole. If you use all possible indicators starting from the micro-level, you would still need to aggregate them to study the overall state. The trajectory of all the other macroeconomic factors can be judged with the help of these key determinants.

Thus, macroeconomists suggest examining these key determinants while assessing the changes in the economy on the macroeconomic level.

02

Reason for not including all possible data for studying and examining macroeconomics

Inclusion of all possible data to study the changes in the economy would lead to more investment of time and resources to reach the outcome. Also, macroeconomists can achieve the same outcome by examining only key determinants. Thus, macroeconomists would not advise examining all data to save time and resources.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the annual rates of growth of real GDP in Econoland over a five-year period were sequentially as follows: 3 percent, 1 percent, −2 percent, 4 percent, and 5 percent. What was the average of these growth rates in Econoland over these five years? What term would economists use to describe what happened in year 3? If the growth rate in year 3 had been a positive 2 percent rather than a negative 2 percent, what would have been Econoland’s average growth rate over the five years?

True or False. The term economic investment includes purchases of stocks, bonds, and real estate.

A mathematical approximation called the rule of 70 tells us how long it

will take for something to double in size if it grows at a constant rate. The

doubling time is approximately equal to the number 70 divided by the percentage

rate of growth. Thus, if Panama’s real GDP per person is growing at 7 percent per

year, it will take about 10 years (= 70/7) to double. Apply the rule of 70 to solve the

following problem: Real GDP per person in Panama in 2017 was about \(15,000

per person, while it was about \)60,000 per person in the United States. If real GDP

per person in Panama grows at the rate of 5 percent per year, about how long will ittake Panama’s real GDP per person to reach the level that the United States was

at in 2017? (Hint: How many times would Panama’s 2017 real GDP per person

have to double to reach the United States’ 2017 real GDP per person?)

Suppose that Glitter Gulch, a gold mining firm, increased its sales revenues on newly mined gold from \(100 million to \)200 million between one year and the next. Assuming that the price of gold increased by 100 percent over the same period, by what numerical amount did Glitter Gulch’s real output change? If the price of gold had not changed, what would have been the change in Glitter Gulch’s real output?

Are labor costs a major fraction of the typical firm’s overall production costs? How does wage stickiness cause price stickiness? Discuss why firms are averse to cutting wages and salaries during a business downturn.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.