/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 16 It is late 2019 , and the U.S. e... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 13: Q. 16 (page 297)

It is late 2019 , and the U.S. economy is showing signs of slipping into a potentially deep recession. Government policymakers are searching for income-tax-policy changes that will bring about a significant and lasting boost to real consumption spending. According to the logic of the permanent income hypothesis, should the proposed income-tax-policy changes involve tax increases or tax reductions, and should the policy changes be short-lived or long-lasting?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Tax cuts can increase consumers' real disposable income and consequently their real consumption spending, but the government wants big tax cuts.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction 

The given is about the signs shown by the U.S economy of slipping into a potentially deep recession

The objective is to determine should the taxes be fixed as short term or long term

02

Step 1

Consumption flows are based on the level of permanent income or predicted long-term average income, according to the permanent income hypothesis.

Increases in predicted long-term average income lead to higher consumption spending, and vice versa.

03

Step 2

Tax reductions can increase households' real disposable income and thus impact real consumption spending.

However, if the government wants a significant and long-term boost to real consumption spending, it must make the income-tax policy change, i.e. tax reductions, a long-term change because only then can permanent income be increased, resulting in a significant and long-term boost to real consumption spending.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine whether each of the following is an example of an automatic fiscal stabilizer.

a. A federal agency must extend loans to businesses whenever an economic downturn begins.

b. As the economy heats up, the resulting increase in equilibrium real GDP per year immediately results in higher income tax payments, which dampen consumption spending somewhat.

c. As the economy starts to recover from a severe recession and more people go back to work, government-funded unemployment compensation payments begin to decline.

d. To stem an overheated economy, the president, using special powers granted by Congress, authorizes emergency impoundment of funds that Congress had previously authorized for spending on govemment programs.

Consider the diagram below, in which the current short-run equilibrium is at point A, and answer the questions that follow.

a. What type of gap exists at point A?

b. If the marginal propensity to save equals 0.02, what change in government spending financed by borrowing from the private sector could eliminate the gap identified in part (a)? Explain.

Recall that the Keynesian spending multiplier equals 1 /(1-MPC). Suppose that in panel (a) of Figure 13-1, the government determined that the amount by which the AD curve had to be shifted directly rightward from the point E1 was equal to \(1.0 trillion. If the government decided that a \)0.2 trillion increase in real government spending was required to generate this shift, what must be the value of the MPC?

A government is currently operating with an annual budget deficit of \(40 billion. The government has determined that every \)10 billion reduction in the amount it borrows each year would reduce the market interest rate by 0.1 percentage point. Furthermore, it has determined that every 0.1-percentage-point change in the market interest rate generates a change in planned investment expenditures in the opposite direction equal to \(5 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.75. Finally, the government knows that to eliminate an inflationary gap and take into account the resulting change in the price level, it must generate a net leftward shift in the aggregate demand curve equal to \)40 billion. Assuming that there are no direct expenditure offsets to fiscal policy, how much should the government increase taxes? (Hint: How much new private investment spending is induced by each $10 billion decrease in government spending? )

Assume that equilibrium real GDP is \( 18.2 trillion and full-employment equilibrium (F E) is \) 18.55 trillion. The marginal propensity to save is 17. Answer the questions using the data in the following graph.

a. What is the marginal propensity to consume?

b. By how much must new investment or government spending increase to bring the economy up to full employment?

c. By how much must government cut personal taxes to stimulate the economy to the full employment equilibrium?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

Taxation Economics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.