/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 12 Refer back to Problem 14-11. If ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer back to Problem 14-11. If the politician defines "the rich" as people with annual taxable incomes exceeding \(1 million per year, what is another difficulty with the politician's reasoning, given that "the rich" rarely earn a combined taxable income exceeding \)1 trillion, yet the federal deficit has regularly exceeded $1 trillion in recent years?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Only eight percent of the estimated budget shortfall is expected to be covered by revenues of around 50 dollar billion.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

In recent years, the federal budget has been continually in deficit, making it difficult for the government to carry out its budget initiatives based on annual budget predictions.

02

Federal government needs 

Policymakers have argued that the budget deficit can be spread out fully by increasing the total amount of tax collected at the end of the year.

According to the federal government, the federal budget deficit is estimated to be around $563billion USD.

The federal government needs to collect roughly 4000dollars in additional taxes from each and every worker in the United States in order to cover the budget deficit.

Furthermore, the budget projection figures that are being specified in order to eliminate the budget deficit are mostly unnecessary, as this technique will not eliminate the deficit.

Another recommendation for policymakers is to increase the tax rate on the wealthiest persons in the economy.

03

Explanation

However, in the present case, this approach will not function because the rich are typically characterized as millionaires with taxable income of more than one million per year. On the other hand, the number of persons who fit under this category is quite small, at around three lakh.

Even raising the tax rates will have no effect because the reduction in the deficit amount will be insignificant. Similarly, changing the amounts of marginal tax rates will not help to bring the deficit down to the required level.

The IRS's findings have regularly revealed that additional revenues generated by raising tax rates are insignificant, with revenues of roughly fifty billion dollars accounting for only eight percent of the expected budget shortfall.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Under what circumstance would the transfer of U.S. taxpayers' funds to holders of U.S. debt residing in Japan and China constitute a "burden" on future generations of U.S. taxpayers? Explain briefly.

To which key set of expenditures do you suppose that "other things being equal" definitely applies in the government's projections displayed in panel (b) of Figure 14-6? (Hint: Which types of expenses does the government often refer to as "non controllable"?)

Suppose that the economy is experiencing the short-run equilibrium position depicted at point Ain the diagram below. Then the government raises its spending and thereby runs a budget deficit in an effort to boost equilibrium real GDP to its long-run equilibrium level of $18trillion (in base-year dollars). Explain the effects of an increase in the government deficit on equilibrium real GDP and the equilibrium price level. In addition, given that many taxes and government benefits vary with real GDP, discuss what change we might expect to see in the budget deficit as a result of the effects on equilibrium real GDP.

Take a look at the most recent years of data on the net public debt displayed in Figure 14-3, and then examine the most recent years of data on federal budget deficits shown in Figure 14-2. Why do you suppose that the net public debt as a percentage of GDP has grown more slowly recently than was the case between 2008 and 2015 ?

In each of the past few years, the federal government has regularly borrowed funds to pay for at least one-third of expenditures that tax revenues were insufficient to cover. More than60percent

of all federal expenditures now go for entitlement spending. What does this fact imply about how the government is paying for most of its discretionary expenditures?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.