/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.12.2 Identify the primary determinant... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Identify the primary determinants of planned investment

Short Answer

Expert verified

The primary determinants of planned investments are as follows:

Interest Rates, Expectations, Incomes or the Profits, Technology Used, The Policy of the Government, Cost of Capital Goods, The Stock of the capital, etc.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

  • Any kind of investment will lead to increase in the capital in the long run.
  • And increase in the capital will lead to the increase in the production of goods and services.
  • There are many factors which affects the investment decision of any consumer.
02

Explain the factors

There are many factors affecting the decision of planned investment of an individual. Some of them are given as :

  1. Governmental Policies: The government, in any economy performs the prime role of determining the kind or the amount of investment that is going to happen. This is known as Government's Fiscal Policy. The starting point of the Government's Fiscal Policy is the investment in the tax credit. With investment increasing for the tax credit, the investment level overall in an economy rises.
  2. Technology: If there is any implementation of any new technology in the economy then the investment level will rise. For example, with advanced technologies like computers used in various sectors of an economy, the investment in computer technology increases.
  3. Expectations of the Consumers and Producers: If the expectations of the consumers and producers present in an economy rise then there will be an increase in the level of investment.
  4. Interest Rates: The interest rates and the investments in the economy are inversely proportional to each other, which means that if the interest rate is high then in that case it will be less expensive to invest. Similarly, if the interest rates are low then in that case investment in the economy will be costlier.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The marginal propensity to consume is equal to 0.80. An increase in household wealth causes autonomous consumption to rise by 10billion. By how much will equilibrium real GDP increase at the current price level. other things being equal?

In light of the fact that a fall in real net wealth during a recession causes real saving to increase, does the saving function shift upward or downward when real net wealth decreases? Explain your reasoning.

Consider movements from points F to K in both panels of Figure 12-1. Use the resulting changes in planned real consumption and saving corresponding to the change in real disposable income to calculate the marginal propensities to consume and to save.

How could toughened federal regulations of businesses during the current decade have inhibited a rightward shift in the imvestment function?

At various times in the past-the early 1980 s, early 1990 s, early 2000 s, and late 2000 s-business profit expectations plummeted, and firms cut back on their investment spending. The ratio of total investment spending to companies' aggregate profit flows decreased markedly. In each instance, real GDP declined, and the U.S. economy fell into recession. At the end of the recession intervals of the early 1980 s, early1990 s, and early 2000 s, business profit expectations improved. Firms responded by boosting their investment spending, and both real GDP and the ratio of investment expenditures to firms' profits recovered fully. At the conclusion of the late-2000s recession, however, this ratio failed to return to its previous level. By the time you have completed this chapter, you will understand why the result during this current decade has been a sluggish improvement in real GDP and, hence, an unusually slow economic recovery.

Evaluate why autonomous changes in total planned expenditures have a multiplier effect on equilibrium real GDP

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.