/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 As people age, they typically sp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

As people age, they typically spend more on luxury goods than when they are younger. Does this mean that diminishing marginal utility of money declines as people age?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: No, it cannot be concluded that the diminishing marginal utility of money declines as people age just because people spend more on luxury goods as they get older. The consumption of luxury goods reflects a change in preferences and lifestyle, which does not necessarily indicate a change in the marginal utility of money.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the concept of diminishing marginal utility

Diminishing marginal utility is an economic principle stating that as a person consumes more of a good or service, the additional satisfaction (utility) they receive from each additional unit of the good or service decreases. In the context of money, diminishing marginal utility means that each extra dollar of income brings less utility compared to the previous dollar earned.
02

Consider the spending habits of older people

It is given that as people age, they typically spend more on luxury goods than when they are younger. Luxury goods are items that are not essential for survival but improve one's quality of life. The increased spending on luxury goods could be due to various reasons, such as having accumulated wealth, having fewer financial responsibilities, or having higher disposable income.
03

Analyze the relationship between diminishing marginal utility and age

If the diminishing marginal utility of money declines as people age, this would imply that each additional dollar earned becomes more important to them, despite spending more on luxury goods. But, in this context, it is essential to note that increased consumption of luxury goods does not directly indicate the diminishing marginal utility of money. Instead, it reflects people's preferences and, therefore, their willingness to spend money on luxury items.
04

Evaluate the statement

Based on the analysis in the previous steps, it cannot be concluded that diminishing marginal utility of money declines with age, just because people spend more on luxury goods as they get older. The consumption of luxury goods reflects a change in preferences and lifestyle, which does not necessarily indicate a change in the marginal utility of money. In conclusion, while aging may be associated with a greater willingness to spend on luxury goods, it does not imply that the diminishing marginal utility of money declines as people age.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Luxury Goods
Luxury goods are items that elevate the quality of life but aren't necessary for basic survival. Examples include designer clothing, high-end cars, and five-star holidays. As people become older, they often find themselves drawn to these goods. But why is that the case?
As age progresses, individuals may have greater financial security, more accumulated savings, and potentially lower expenses related to dependents. This shift in financial circumstances allows them to indulge in non-essential goods. By spending more on luxury goods, they are seeking greater enjoyment and satisfaction in life.
Unlike staple goods, luxury goods carry a higher price tag and signify a certain status or aspiration. Sometimes, it's about the experience that luxury goods offer, like the joy of a luxury car ride or the comfort of branded fashion. These goods provide a different kind of utility, one aligned with personal satisfaction beyond basic needs. Hence, they are desirable even if they don't exhibit diminishing marginal utility in the same way essential goods might.
Disposable Income
Disposable income is the portion of an individual's earnings left after taxes and essential life expenses. It's essentially the money available for spending or saving as one wishes. For older people, this often increases due to various factors.
Once major life expenses, like paying off a mortgage or funding their children's education, are covered, individuals find they have more disposable income. This can significantly impact their spending power. More disposable income enables individuals to purchase luxury goods, enhancing their lifestyle and possibly fueling their passion for hobbies.
Moreover, increased disposable income provides more freedom to make choices about how to allocate money. This flexibility allows for greater emphasis on personal satisfaction and indulgences, rather than just covering core needs. Though one might think more disposable income could mean a lowered marginal utility for money, often, it simply shifts spending patterns towards personal happiness.
Economic Principles
Economic principles, like the diminishing marginal utility, help us understand how individuals make choices about spending and consumption. The principle states that as you consume more of a good, the additional satisfaction gained from each extra unit decreases.
This principle isn't just limited to goods. It's also applicable to money itself. If you have less money, each additional dollar matters significantly. But as your wealth grows, the importance of each extra dollar may diminish. However, this is a general rule and can vary depending on personal preferences and life stages.
As people age, although they spend more on luxury goods, it doesn’t necessarily mean the diminishing marginal utility of money shifts. It might just mean they have reached a point where they prioritize satisfaction and enjoyment differently. Economic principles suggest that lifestyle changes, interests, and willingness to spend money can all change how diminishing marginal utility is perceived. So, while spending patterns evolve, the underlying principles continue to shape decisions, albeit in varied ways.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What does it mean to say that people like to ‘‘play with the house’s money’’?

Is it possible for marginal utility to be negative and total utility positive? Explain.

Using the following information, calculate total utility and marginal utility. a. Plot the total utility curve. b. Plot marginal utility directly below total utility. c. At what marginal utility value does total utility reach a maximum? \(\begin{array}{lr}\text { Number of utils for the first unit } & 300 \\ \text { Number of utils for the second unit } & 250 \\ \text { Number of utils for the third unit } & 220 \\ \text { Number of utils for the fourth unit } & 160 \\\ \text { Number of utils for the fifth unit } & 100 \\ \text { Number of utils for the sixth unit } & 50 \\ \text { Number of utils for the seventh unit } & 20 \\ \text { Number of utils for the eighth unit } & 0 \\ \text { Number of utils for the ninth unit } & -250\end{array}\)

Would it make any sense to say that, since a change in tax policy makes Jorge lose utility while Mary and Demitri gain utility, the policy is good if the loss in Jorge’s utility is less than the combined gain in Mary and Demitri’s utilities? How about the other way around—Jorge’s loss of utility is greater than Mary and Demitri’s combined gain?

Many people who earn incomes below some level receive food stamps from the government. Economists argue that these people would be better off if the government gave them the cash equivalent of the food stamps rather than the food stamps. What is the basis of the economists’ argument?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.