/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Would a business be expected to ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Would a business be expected to survive in the long run if it earned a positive accounting profit but a negative economic profit? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, a business is not expected to survive in the long run if it earns a positive accounting profit but a negative economic profit. This is because the negative economic profit indicates that the resources could have been better used elsewhere to generate more value than currently being derived from the business.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Accounting Profit

An accounting profit is the profit declared by following the principles of accounting. It calculates monetary gains by taking the difference between the total revenue and explicit costs. Explicit costs are actual payments like rent, salaries, supplies and other tangible expenses.
02

Understand Economic Profit

Economic profit is a measure of profit where both explicit and opportunity costs (implicit) are considered. Opportunity costs are the value of the best alternative use of the resources. For example, if the resources were not invested in this business, they could have been invested in other ventures or deposits that could earn interest.
03

Apply Concept to The Problem

If a business is earning a positive accounting profit (revenue > explicit costs) but a negative economic profit, it means that the opportunity costs (implicit costs) are higher than the accounting profits. This business essentially isn't performing as well as it could have if its resources were allocated differently. Although currently the business may not be in a financial deficit, given that our interest lies in maximizing profit, this scenario isn't ideal.
04

Conclude

In the long run, a business is unlikely to survive. This is because it must generate at least a normal profit to cover the opportunity costs of the resources used. If the business fails to do this over the long term, it would be better to reallocate these resources to more profitable ventures.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Accounting Profit
Accounting profit is a measurement of a company's financial performance using traditional accounting methods. It represents the difference between total revenues and total explicit costs—costs that involve direct, out-of-pocket payments such as wages, rent, and materials. For a business, achieving a positive accounting profit indicates they are making more money than the costs incurred in operations. This measurement is crucial as it provides the initial insight into profitability and helps in filing taxes or financial reporting.

However, while helpful for understanding financial health, accounting profit does not consider all types of costs. It does not account for opportunity costs, which are indirect costs associated with choosing one option over another. By only looking at tangible costs like salaries and supplies, it might present an overly optimistic view of a company's profitability. Thus, it's essential for businesses to look at both accounting profit and other measurements to get a full picture of their economic health.
Opportunity Costs
Opportunity costs go beyond the scope of traditional accounting and represent the potential benefits missed when one option is chosen over another. These are implicit costs and they are pivotal in evaluating the true economic profit of a business.

Consider a scenario where a business owner chooses to invest in their current business instead of another venture or savings account that earns interest. The foregone profit from the alternative choice becomes an opportunity cost. These costs can significantly alter how we perceive a company's profitability, as they reflect the profit that could have been earned elsewhere.

The concept of opportunity cost underscores the importance of carefully considering how resources are allocated. By evaluating both explicit and opportunity costs, businesses can make better decisions that maximize economic profits rather than just accounting profits. It's crucial in strategy planning, especially when deciding the most effective use of resources to ensure long-term success.
Long-Run Viability
Long-run viability refers to a business's ability to sustain its operations over an extended period, ensuring that it remains profitable and competitive. To consider a business viable, it must at least achieve a normal profit, which covers both explicit and implicit costs, including opportunity costs.

When a business only earns a positive accounting profit but faces a negative economic profit, there's a risk that it will not be viable in the long run. This situation suggests that the resources might be better allocated elsewhere, as the opportunity costs are higher than the gains. Even if a business is not losing money on paper, if its economic profit is negative, it is essentially underperforming.

For long-run survival, a business needs to evaluate whether its use of resources yields the highest possible return. This involves reconsidering its strategy, potentially looking for better investment opportunities, reducing waste, or innovating. Achieving long-run viability is crucial for retaining competitiveness and ensuring that the business can navigate challenges and capitalize on growth opportunities over time.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that shortly after graduating from college, you decide to start your own business. Will you be likely to organize the business as a sole proprietorship, a partnership, or a corporation? Explain your reasoning.

Suppose that a firm in which you have invested is losing money. Would you rather own the firm's stock or the firm's bonds? Briefly explain.

What does it mean to describe large corporations as having a separation of ownership from control? How is the separation of ownership from control related to the principal-agent problem?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 256) Two economists at the Brookings Institution argued that "new firms rather than existing ones have accounted for a disproportionate share of disruptive and thus highly productivity enhancing innovations in the past- the automobile, the airplane, the computer and personal computer, air conditioning, and Internet search, to name just a few." a. Why might new firms be more likely than older firms to introduce "disruptive" innovations? b. Assuming that these economists are correct about the most important source of productivity enhancing innovations, what are the implications for the future of the U.S. economy of recent trends in the formation of new businesses?

Paolo currently has \(\$ 100,000\) invested in bonds that earn him 4 percent interest per year. He wants to open a pizza restaurant and is considering either selling the bonds and using the \(\$ 100,000\) to start his restaurant or borrowing \(\$ 100,000\) from a bank, which would charge him an annual interest rate of 6 percent. He finally decides to sell the bonds and not take out the bank loan. He reasons: "Because I already have the \(\$ 100,000\) invested in the bonds, I don't have to pay anything to use the money. If I take out the bank loan, I have to pay interest, so my costs of producing pizza will be higher if I take out the loan than if I sell the bonds." Evaluate Paolo's reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.