/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Suppose that Congress passes a n... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that Congress passes a new law that requires all firms to accept paper currency in exchange for whatever they are selling. Briefly discuss who would gain and who would lose from this legislation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
People who prefer or need to use cash for transactions would benefit from this legislation. However, businesses, particularly small ones, could incur additional costs and risks due to the need to handle and store physical cash. Thus, there are both winners and losers from this legislation.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Beneficiaries

First, think about who would benefit from this law. One group that might benefit are people who prefer to use cash payments rather than digital means. This could include older adults who are comfortable with traditional methods or people without access to digital banking services. These groups would now have a guaranteed right to use cash everywhere.
02

Identify the Disadvantaged

Next, identify who would be at a disadvantage. Companies that have established mainly digital payment methods might encounter additional operational costs because of having to adjust their systems to receive cash. Small businesses in particular might be adversely affected, as they would need to invest in secure cash handling and storage options, which could be a financial burden. Additionally, any business would face an increased risk of theft, since handling and storing physical money comes with such dangers.
03

Weigh Costs and Benefits

Weigh the benefits and the drawbacks of the law. This step is not so much about finding definitive answers as about deepening understanding of the ways in which economic policies can have diverse impacts. The conclusion might highlight that while the legislation ensures wider accessibility for purchases using cash, it could impose significant costs and risks for businesses, particularly small ones.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cash Transactions
Cash transactions involve the exchange of physical currency for goods or services. They offer several distinct advantages, such as immediate settlement and no involvement of third parties like banks or payment networks. Cash is accessible to anyone who has it, requiring no need for a bank account or credit check, making it a preferred method for some individuals.
However, the use of cash also entails certain challenges, especially for businesses. Handling physical money can involve significant operational costs due to the need for secure storage and potential security risks, like theft. This is particularly a concern for smaller businesses with limited resources.
Despite these challenges, cash remains an essential form of payment that ensures inclusivity, allowing even those without access to digital financial services to partake in the economy.
Digital Payments
Digital payments refer to transactions made through online or electronic methods, often via credit cards, mobile apps, or online banking. These payments can offer convenience, speed, and security for both consumers and businesses. They reduce the need for physical currency handling and can integrate easily with business accounting systems, simplifying financial management.
However, not everyone can access digital payments. Barriers such as lack of internet access, digital literacy, or bank accounts can exclude certain groups from these benefits. As a result, while digital payments are rapidly gaining popularity and are favored for their efficiency, they are not equally accessible to all segments of society, highlighting the need for diverse payment options in business operations.
Legislation Impact
The impact of legislation mandating cash transactions affects various stakeholders differently. On one hand, such a law can enhance financial inclusivity by ensuring that individuals without digital payment access still have the ability to transact. This is particularly beneficial for certain demographics, like seniors or those in rural areas, who may face barriers in digital payment adoption.
On the other hand, businesses, especially those primarily operating with digital payments, could face increased operational challenges. They might need to invest in new infrastructure to handle cash, resulting in higher costs and potential security vulnerabilities. Additionally, the processing of cash can be time-consuming, potentially slowing down operations and affecting business efficiency.
Overall, the legislation aims to balance technological advancement with accessibility, but it also introduces complexities that businesses must navigate.
Business Operations
Business operations encompass the processes and systems employed to run a company effectively. In the context of payment methods, businesses might choose between cash and digital transactions based on factors like cost, efficiency, and target customer base.
Mandatory acceptance of cash could require significant adjustments, such as training staff to handle cash and managing cash flow securely. For businesses that have optimized systems for digital transactions, this could mean a shift back to manual processes, impacting productivity and introducing new risks, such as theft or error in handling money.
Moreover, integrating cash handling requires investment in storage solutions and security measures, impacting small businesses more severely due to their limited resources. Therefore, adapting to such legislative requirements can be seen as both a logistical and financial challenge for businesses focused on digital operations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in the Wall Street Journal noted that online peer-to-peer lenders "have automated the processes of checking borrowers' credit metrics and looking up their histories while in many cases avoiding more labor-intensive practices of collecting and reviewing pay stubs or tax returns." The article also noted, "Charge-off rates, which reflect loans on which a lender doesn't expect to collect, have risen." a. Why do banks require borrowers to submit pay stubs and tax returns when applying for a loan? Why would online lenders skip this step in the loan application process? b. If online lenders find that borrowers are defaulting on loans at higher- than-expected rates, can they offset the problem by charging higher interest rates on the loans? Briefly explain.

In a column in the Wall Street Journal, Kevin Brady, a member of Congress from Texas, stated, "To get Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act [in \(1913,\) President Woodrow] Wilson had to retain the support of \(\ldots\) northeastern lawmakers while convincing southern and western Democrats that legislation would not \(\ldots\) create a [single] central bank. Wilson's ingenious solution was federalism." Explain what Congressman Brady meant when he stated that Woodrow Wilson used "federalism" to convince Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act.

Based on a Survey of Consumer Payment Choice, researchers from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston estimated that the average consumer, 18 years of age and older, held about \(\$ 202\) in currency. However, as noted in the chapter, there is actually about \(\$ 4,500\) of currency in circulation for every person in the United States. a. How can the amount of U.S. currency in circulation be so much higher than the amount held by the U.S. population? b. What does the difference in part (a) imply about the measures of the money supply of the United States?

Is the quantity theory of money better able to explain the inflation rate in the long run or in the short run? Briefly explain.

According to Peter Heather, a historian at King's College London, during the time of the Roman Empire, the German tribes east of the Rhine River (the area the Romans called Germania) produced no coins of their own but used Roman coins instead: Although no coinage was produced in Germania, Roman coins were in plentiful circulation and could easily have provided a medium of exchange (already in the first century, Tacitus tells us, Germani of the Rhine region were using good-quality Roman silver coins for this purpose). a. What is a medium of exchange? b. What does the author mean when he writes that Roman coins "could easily have provided a medium of exchange" for the German tribes? c. Why would any member of a German tribe have been willing to accept a Roman coin from another member of the tribe in exchange for goods or services when the tribes were not part of the Roman Empire and were not governed by Roman law?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.