/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 In discussing dividing up househ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In discussing dividing up household chores, Emily Oster, an economist at the University of Chicago, advised, "No, you shouldn't always unload the dishwasher because you're better at it." If you are better at unloading the dishwasher, why shouldn't you be the one to unload it?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Despite being more efficient at unloading the dishwasher, due to the principle of comparative advantage, you should not always be the one to do it. This is because if your opportunity cost is higher for performing this task (i.e., forgoing more valuable activities), the chore should be given to someone who has a lower opportunity cost.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Comparative Advantage

To comprehend Emily's statement, an understanding of the economic concept of comparative advantage is required. This principle is the ability of an individual, business, or country to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than others. Opportunity cost is the cost of forgoing the next best alternative when making a decision.
02

Apply the Concept to Scenario

Even if you are more efficient at unloading the dishwasher, it doesn't mean you should always be the one to do it due to the principle of comparative advantage. Suppose unloading the dishwasher takes less time for you than for your roommate. However, suppose your opportunity cost in terms of what you can achieve in that time (say, working on an important project, or learning a new skill) is higher than your roommate's. In this case, it would be more beneficial to divide tasks so that you can utilize your time more efficiently, and your roommate can unload the dishwasher.
03

Conclusion

The key to dividing tasks efficiently is not just looking at absolute efficiency, but also considering opportunity costs. Despite being superior at a task, if your opportunity cost is high for performing it, it might be better if someone else does it who has a lower opportunity cost. This approach allows for maximum productivity and efficiency for all parties involved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Opportunity Cost
Opportunity cost is a fundamental concept in economics, and it plays a crucial role in decision-making processes. It is defined as the value of the next best alternative that one foregoes when making a choice. For instance, if you decide to spend an hour unloading the dishwasher, you have to consider what you give up during that time. Maybe it's reading a book or working on a project that could help your career.
Opportunity cost helps us understand that the real cost of any choice is not only what you spend on it, but also what you give up. If unloading the dishwasher is taking time that could be used for more valuable actions, like studying or working, the cost is not just the time spent but the loss of potential benefits from the foregone activity.
In practical terms, when making decisions about how to allocate time and resources, it is important to weigh these opportunity costs. This can help achieve better outcomes by choosing options that maximize overall benefits.
Economic Efficiency
Economic efficiency is about using resources in a way that maximizes the output of goods and services. It is an important goal because it focuses on making the best use of resources to satisfy human wants.
To achieve economic efficiency, tasks should be allocated based on who can perform them at the lowest opportunity cost, not just who can do them fastest. This might mean allowing one person to focus on activities that generate more value while others handle different tasks. For example, if someone is exceptionally skilled at cooking and enjoys it, it might be efficient for them to handle meals while others tackle chores where they have a comparative advantage.
Understanding economic efficiency helps us see why it’s beneficial to consider opportunity costs in daily chores and broader economic activities. It encourages individuals and organizations to optimize their resources and efforts to create more value overall.
Resource Allocation
Resource allocation refers to the process by which resources like time, money, and labor are distributed and used. It's a concept that applies to organizations, nations, and individuals. In the context of chores or projects, effective resource allocation means everyone contributes in a way that leverages their strengths. It involves analyzing who should do what based not only on ability but also on where each person's contribution offers the most significant return or value.
Smart resource allocation can lead to increased productivity, as tasks are distributed in a way that aligns with each person's unique abilities and available time. This lets everyone work on what they're best at or what yields the highest payoff for their investment of time or effort.
This method also reduces wastage of resources and ensures that everyone can engage in activities that matter most to them, which is essential for both individual satisfaction and mutual progress.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If Nicaragua can produce with the same amount of resources twice as much coffee as Colombia, explain how Colombia could have a comparative advantage in producing coffee.

After Russia seized what had formerly been the Ukrainian territory of Crimea in February \(2014,\) the United States and many other countries imposed economic sanctions that reduced the ability of Russia to engage in international trade. A columnist writing in the New York Times noted, "If sanctions push Russia onto a path of greater self-reliance, its manufacturing and service industries will surely grow faster." If the columnist is correct about the effect of the sanctions, are the sanctions likely to improve the economic well-being of the average Russian in the long run? Briefly explain.

State government Medicaid programs provide medical insurance to poor and disabled people. A news article described a new prescription drug that costs as much as "\$ 94,000 for one 12 -week treatment regimen" to treat hepatitis \(\mathrm{C}\), a liver disease. Several states restricted access to the new drug under their Medicaid programs to patients who are most acutely ill (stage 3 or stage 4\()\) with hepatitis C. State Medicaid programs are paid for, in part, out of state budgets. What trade-offs do state governments face when new prescription drugs are introduced with much higher prices than existing drugs? Do you agree with states providing expensive new drugs only to the patients who are most ill from a disease? Briefly explain.

During the 1928 U.S. presidential election campaign, Herbert Hoover, the Republican candidate, argued that the United States should import only products that could not be produced here. Briefly explain whether this policy would be likely to raise average income in the United States.

Lawrence Summers served as secretary of the Treasury in the Clinton administration and as director of the National Economic Council in the Obama administration. He has been quoted as giving the following defense of the economic approach to policy issues: There is nothing morally unattractive about saying: We need to analyze which way of spending money on health care will produce more benefit and which less, and using our money as efficiently as we can. I don't think there is anything immoral about seeking to achieve environmental benefits at the lowest possible costs. Would it be more ethical to reduce pollution without worrying about the cost or by taking the cost into account? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.