/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Imagine that the next time the N... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Imagine that the next time the New England Patriots play the Miami Dolphins at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, Patriots star quarterback Tom Brady has a temporary lack of judgment and plans to sell Patriots memorabilia during the game because he realizes that he can sell five times more Patriots products than anyone in the stadium sports gear store. Likewise, imagine that you are a creative and effective manager at work and that you tell your employees that during the next six months, you plan to clean the offices because you can clean five times better than the cleaning staff. What error in judgment are both you and Tom making? Why shouldn't you and Tom do what you are better than anyone else at doing?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The error in judgement both the manager and Tom Brady are making is failing to consider their unique opportunity costs. Even though they can perform the tasks better, they should not divert their attention from their primary responsibilities where they provide unique value. By doing so, they sub optimize their overall productivity and value generation.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the error you and Tom Brady are making

You and Tom Brady are under the illusion that because you are more productive at a task, you should therefore perform it. However, this undermines the principle of comparative advantage, which states that an individual or entity can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than others. The mistake lies in not considering the potential opportunity costs: what are you giving up by taking on these tasks?
02

Understand opportunity cost

Opportunity cost refers to the potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. Even if you are five times more effective, it doesn't mean you should do it if it means missing out on other opportunities. In the cases given, Tom Brady would be missing out on fulfilling his primary role as a quarterback, while the manager would fail to perform more crucial managerial duties.
03

Explain why Tom Brady and you shouldn't do what you are better at

The tasks that Tom Brady and the manager at work intend to do could be done at a lower opportunity cost by others. In Brady's case, selling merchandise would take away from his ability to perform in the game, which is far more valuable and cannot be done by anyone else. Similarly, the manager can manage, something the cleaning staff cannot do. Thus, despite their abilities, both individuals would not be utilizing their time effectively. They should focus on tasks only they can do, allowing others to perform tasks which, though performed less efficiently, have less impact if performed by others.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Opportunity Cost
In economic decision making, understanding the notion of opportunity cost is crucial. It’s the benefit or value that one misses out on by choosing one alternative over another. To put it simply, it’s the cost of the next best thing you didn't choose.

Consider a student who chooses to study for an extra hour instead of playing video games. The opportunity cost here is the enjoyment and relaxation they might have gotten from playing. In professional terms, if an employee decides to perform a task that they are exceptionally good at but deprives them of completing higher-priority responsibilities, their opportunity cost is the productivity and output lost from not doing their primary job.

Application in Daily Life and the Work Environment

Opportunity cost is everywhere in our choices. When you decide to sleep in, the opportunity cost might be a missed workout. At work, if a manager spends time on basic administrative tasks they are skilled at instead of strategic planning, the opportunity cost is the long-term benefits of planning they forego. Recognizing this concept helps individuals and businesses to prioritize and make choices that maximize their time and resources.
Principle of Comparative Advantage
The principle of comparative advantage is key to understanding trade and productivity. It suggests that an individual, business, or country is better off specializing in tasks they can perform at a lower opportunity cost compared to others. This doesn't mean they are the best at it, but rather they give up less than others to accomplish the task.

When someone has a comparative advantage in an activity, they should focus on that activity, even if they are more skilled at another task. For example, a famous chef might be able to clean their kitchen faster than anyone else, but cleaning takes time away from creating exquisite dishes, which only they can do to such a high standard. Their comparative advantage is in cooking, not cleaning.

Real-World Implications

On a larger scale, this principle underpins international trade. Countries export goods in which they have a comparative advantage and import those in which they do not. This allows for a more efficient allocation of global resources, boosting productivity and economic growth worldwide.
Economic Decision Making
Effective economic decision making involves analyzing various choices and selecting the one that results in the optimum outcome, considering the constraints of resources. It’s about allocating limited resources in the best way possible to achieve desired objectives.

Each decision has its trade-offs and is influenced by opportunity costs. People make decisions by comparing the expected marginal benefit to their respective marginal cost. If a business wants to increase production, the decision makers need to consider the cost of additional resources and potential profits from selling more products. Sound economic decision making requires a clear understanding of these concepts and an ability to apply them in various scenarios.

Strategic Implementation

In strategic implementation, decision makers evaluate not only the direct costs but also indirect factors such as time, information, and the potential costs of not acting. A thorough analysis leads to informed decisions that can propel an individual or organization toward its goals.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

State government Medicaid programs provide medical insurance to poor and disabled people. A news article described a new prescription drug that costs as much as "\$ 94,000 for one 12 -week treatment regimen" to treat hepatitis \(\mathrm{C}\), a liver disease. Several states restricted access to the new drug under their Medicaid programs to patients who are most acutely ill (stage 3 or stage 4\()\) with hepatitis C. State Medicaid programs are paid for, in part, out of state budgets. What trade-offs do state governments face when new prescription drugs are introduced with much higher prices than existing drugs? Do you agree with states providing expensive new drugs only to the patients who are most ill from a disease? Briefly explain.

What is the basis for trade: absolute advantage or comparative advantage? How can an individual or a country gain from specialization and trade?

During the 1928 U.S. presidential election campaign, Herbert Hoover, the Republican candidate, argued that the United States should import only products that could not be produced here. Briefly explain whether this policy would be likely to raise average income in the United States.

Suppose the U.S. president is attempting to decide whether the federal government should spend more on research to find a cure for heart disease. Imagine that you are the president's economic advisor and need to prepare a report discussing the relevant factors the president should consider. Use the concepts of opportunity cost and trade-offs to discuss some of the main issues you would deal with in your report.

Draw a production possibilities frontier that shows the trade-off between the production of cotton and the production of soybeans. a. Show the effect that a prolonged drought would have on the initial production possibilities frontier. b. Suppose that genetic modification makes soybeans resistant to insects, allowing yields to double. Show the effect of this technological change on the initial production possibilities frontier.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.