/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 In Chapter 4, Section 4.3, we di... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Chapter 4, Section 4.3, we discussed the federal government's agricultural program, which is often called the "farm bill." Because the U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), more generally known as the food stamp program, its funding is included in the farm bill. Some members of Congress believe that spending on SNAP should be reduced. In an article in the Washington Post, Marion Nestle of New York University was quoted as arguing: "[The program is] at great risk, and what has saved it from being chopped up into little pieces is that it's in the Farm Bill and therefore logrolled with agricultural supports." Briefly explain what Nestle means by "logrolling" and evaluate her argument.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Logrolling refers to a practice where politicians support each other's interests through reciprocal voting. Nestle uses it to explain how SNAP has been shielded from budget cuts due to its inclusion in the 'Farm Bill'. Her argument suggests that this practice has helped SNAP gain wider support among politicians who support agricultural policies as they are included together in the 'Farm Bill'.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Logrolling

Firstly, the term 'logrolling' is important to comprehend before understanding the context in which it is used by Nestle. In politics, 'logrolling' is a practice in which politicians support each other's interests by reciprocal voting for each other's proposed legislation.
02

Contextualizing Logrolling in the 'Farm Bill'

In the context of Nestle's quote, 'logrolling' is the practice of combining unrelated policies into a single piece of legislation (the 'Farm Bill' in this case), in order to gain broader support. This is because politicians who support the agricultural supports will also have to support SNAP, as they are packaged together in the 'Farm Bill'.
03

Evaluating Nestle's Argument

Nestle argues that logrolling has protected SNAP from budget cuts because it is included in the 'Farm Bill'. To evaluate this statement, consider if the amalgamation of agricultural and food stamp policies has indeed resulted in mutual support amongst politicians leading to the protection of SNAP. If SNAP was not a part of this roll, it might be more susceptible to budget cuts as it would not have the broad support that comes with agriculture policy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logrolling
Logrolling is a political strategy often used to secure the passage of legislation. It involves the mutual exchange of favors among legislators, where one politician agrees to vote for another's proposed legislation in return for support on their own legislation. This practice is crucial in passing complex bills that contain varied interests, such as the farm bill.

In the context of agricultural policy, logrolling enables supporters of different policies to achieve their goals by aligning their interests. For example, a legislator who prioritizes agricultural subsidies may support SNAP funding because both issues are bundled together. This reciprocal support facilitates the passing of the farm bill as politicians make compromises to address a wider array of concerns.
Farm Bill
The farm bill is a comprehensive piece of legislation that governs agriculture and food policy in the United States. It is re-evaluated and renewed every few years, encompassing a wide range of programs from crop subsidies to food assistance like SNAP. The **breadth and depth** of the farm bill make it a significant legislative document that impacts numerous sectors.

By combining multiple aspects of agricultural policy, the farm bill acts as a vehicle for broader legislative goals. It not only supports farmers and agricultural industries but also encompasses social programs like SNAP, extending its reach to food security and nutrition improvement. Its all-encompassing nature demands negotiation and compromise, making it a prime candidate for practices like logrolling.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
SNAP, commonly referred to as the food stamp program, is a federal aid initiative to assist low-income households in purchasing nutritious food. Administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, SNAP is vital in combating food insecurity and ensuring basic nutrition for millions of Americans.

Its inclusion in the farm bill demonstrates the intersection between agricultural support and social welfare programs. By linking SNAP with the farm bill, supporters can leverage broader legislative backing. Consequently, despite pressures for budget reductions, its integration into this larger legislative package shields it from cuts due to the mutual interdependencies among lawmakers' agendas.
Political Strategy
Political strategy involves careful planning and negotiation to achieve certain legislative outcomes. In the context of agricultural policy, strategies like logrolling are employed to create alliances among politicians. These alliances enable the passage of complex bills like the farm bill by addressing the diverse needs and interests involved.

Effective political strategy requires understanding the motivations and priorities of different legislative stakeholders. By forging strategic partnerships through logrolling and similar tactics, policymakers can secure enough votes to pass comprehensive legislation. Thus, logrolling isn't just a compromise tool; it's a calculated strategy to ensure that all parties can claim some level of victory and support on their specific issues.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in a Federal Reserve publication noted that "nearly all taxes create some market inefficiency in the form of deadweight loss." The article further noted that when something is taxed, the result is "an outcome in which both [buyers and sellers] would gain from more production." a. Briefly explain why taxes result in deadweight loss. b. If buyers and sellers would gain from more production of a good or service that is taxed, why doesn't more of the good or service get produced?"

What is the public choice model?

According to an article in the New York Times, some New Yorkers were deciding to buy existing condominiums (condos) rather than newly constructed condos. One reason given was that some buyers "seek to avoid the 1.825 percent transfer tax that buyers must pay on a brand-new condo. (In resales, the seller pays the tax.)" Analyze this reason for buying a resale rather than a new condo.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 615 ) Business historian John Steele Gordon noted in a Wall Street Journal column that the first federal corporate income tax was enacted in 1909 , before passage of the Sixteenth Amendment made a federal income tax constitutional. According to Gordon, Congress enacted the corporate income tax because of "the political pressure to tax the rich." Is the corporate income tax an efficient means of taxing the rich? Briefly explain.

Jason Furman served as the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President Obama. In an opinion column in the Wall Street Journal discussing President Trump's tax reform proposal, Furman noted the need "for seriously revamping America's inefficient business-tax system to unlock stronger economic growth." But he also observed that tax reform is even more difficult than reforming the health care system "since it touches a larger fraction of the economy and threatens more powerful vested interests." a. Briefly explain what Furman means by "powerful vested interests." b. If tax reform leads to stronger economic growth, shouldn't a majority of Congress support it even if vested interests oppose the reform? Why then has tax reform legislation been difficult for Congress to pass?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.