/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 What are the two ways that the p... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

What are the two ways that the productivity of a firm's employees may increase when a firm moves from straighttime pay to commission or piece-rate pay? If piece-rate or commission systems of compensating workers have important advantages for firms, why don't more firms use them?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Productivity in a firm can increase when moving to commission or piece-rate pay because there's a direct link between employee's output and pay and it cultivates a performance-oriented culture. However, not all firms use them due to the potential of increased job stress, lack of financial security, and the potential encouragement of unethical behavior.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the Benefits of Commission or Piece-Rate Pay

Commission or piece-rate pay systems base compensation on performance rather than on time spent working. There are two main ways that these systems can positively affect productivity. First is the direct relationship between output and pay. When pay is tied directly to productivity instead of hourly wages, employees are incentivized to work harder in order to earn more. The principle of 'more input, more income' becomes palpable. Second, in a piece-rate or commission system, top performers can make significantly more than they would under a fixed wage system. This rewards high-performing individuals, and also cultivates a performance-oriented culture in the company, which can further motivate employees to increase their productivity.
02

Understanding the Drawbacks of Commission or Piece-Rate Pay Systems

Despite the benefits, there are reasons why not all firms adopt commission or piece-rate pay systems. Firstly, these systems often come with higher levels of job stress due to the pressure to perform, which could potentially lead to employee dissatisfaction or turnover. Secondly, they don't offer much financial security to the employees as their income can't be guaranteed and it is directly affected by market fluctuations. Lastly, these systems might encourage unethical behavior or 'corner-cutting', since workers are so focused on achieving high output quantities.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Commission Pay
Commission pay is a compensation structure where employees earn based on their sales or services. Unlike fixed salaries, where pay is determined by the hours worked, commission pay directly ties an employee's earnings to their productivity. This system can significantly boost motivation since employees realize that increased sales equate to higher paychecks.

This type of system works particularly well in professions such as sales, where the value of an employee's contribution is relatively straightforward to measure. Benefits of commission pay include:
  • Encouraging employees to excel and maximize their performance.
  • Promoting a results-oriented culture that can drive overall company success.
  • Offering employees the potential for higher income based on effort and success.
However, there are challenges too. Commission-based pay can introduce high levels of stress, as income varies with performance. Employees might feel immense pressure to constantly outperform, which can sometimes lead to burnout. Another downside is the risk of fostering competition among team members instead of teamwork. Companies may also worry about unethical behaviors, as employees might focus on short-term gains rather than the company's long-term health.
Piece-Rate Pay
Piece-rate pay is a system where workers are compensated for each unit they produce or task they complete, rather than the time they spend working. This creates a direct link between input and output, motivating employees to work efficiently and maximize productivity. Imagine a factory setting where workers are paid for each product assembled or each item packaged; the quicker and more accurate they are, the more they earn.

Advantages of piece-rate pay include:
  • Rewarding efficiency, leading to faster work and potentially higher earnings for diligent employees.
  • Reducing idle time, as there is little financial incentive for employees to slow down their work.
  • Aligning employer and employee goals, as both parties benefit from increased output.
Nonetheless, piece-rate pay isn't without drawbacks. Employees might focus solely on increasing output, sometimes at the expense of quality. Moreover, it can lead to physical fatigue and injury in jobs requiring repetitive tasks. Employers also need to ensure fair rates to keep employees motivated and satisfied. Without proper oversight, there's a risk of reduced collaboration among workers, who may become more like individual competitors than team members.
Performance-Based Compensation
Performance-based compensation systems include commission and piece-rate pay, but can also encompass bonuses and incentives tied to an employee's specific achievements or contributions. These systems aim to align an employee's financial rewards with their output and efforts, thereby driving overall productivity. Performance-based compensation can take many forms in a workplace and serves to encourage maximum effort from employees.

Here's how performance-based systems can benefit organizations:
  • Motivate employees by directly connecting rewards to performance metrics.
  • Encourage continual improvement and innovation, as employees strive to meet and exceed goals.
  • Facilitate clear, measurable performance standards for both employee and employer.
The main drawback lies in the pressure it can place on workers. Employees might experience anxiety from constantly needing to meet targets to earn rewards. Furthermore, competition might overshadow collaboration, leading to a less cohesive work environment. Issues can also arise if goals are not realistically set, potentially leading to employee dissatisfaction or decreased morale. Employers must balance incentives with support to ensure a healthy, competitive atmosphere.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How can we measure the opportunity cost of leisure? What are the substitution effect and the income effect resulting from a wage change? Why is the supply curve of labor usually upward sloping?

Daniel Hamermesh, an economist at the University of Texas, has done a great deal of research on labor markets. According to an article in Forbes, Hamermesh wrote that "below-average-looking men earn \(17 \%\) less than those considered good-looking, while below-average-looking females earn \(12 \%\) less than their attractive counterparts." Is this difference in earnings due to economic discrimination? Briefly explain.

Following the 2016 Major League Baseball season, the market for home run hitters who were free agents and available to sign with any team was unexpectedly quiet. Players such as Edwin Encarnacion and Chris Carter signed for lower salaries and for fewer years than either they or their agents had expected. Here are two explanations for the relatively low salary offers: 1\. Mark Shapiro, president and CEO of the Toronto Blue Jays, explained, "There has been a shift ... in how people value \(\ldots\) defense and some of the other aspects of players' games." 2\. Brian Cashman, general manager of the New York Yankees, blamed the weak market on a greater-thannormal number of power hitters who were free agents: "The chessboard was set up with more participants than there were chairs." Draw two graphs depicting the demand and supply for home run hitters. In the first graph, illustrate a change in the market that is consistent with Mark Shapiro's explanation for the decline in salaries. In the second graph, illustrate a change in the market that is consistent with Brian Cashman's explanation for the decline in salaries. Briefly explain your graphs.

In what sense do employers who discriminate pay an economic penalty? Is this penalty enough to eliminate discrimination? Briefly explain.

For years, the Goodyear Tire \& Rubber Company compensated its sales force by paying a salesperson a salary plus a bonus, based on the number of tires he or she sold. Eventually, Goodyear made two changes to this policy: (1) The basis for the bonus was changed from the quantity of tires sold to the revenue from the tires sold; and (2) salespeople were required to get approval from corporate headquarters in Akron, Ohio, before offering to sell tires to customers at reduced prices. Explain why these changes were likely to increase Goodyear's profits.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.