/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Prices for many goods are higher... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Prices for many goods are higher in the city of Shenzhen on the mainland of China than in the city of Hong Kong. An article in the Economist noted that "individuals can arbitrage these differences through what effectively amounts to smuggling." a. Explain what the article means when it notes that individuals can "arbitrage these price differences." b. Ultimately, what would you expect the result to be of individuals engaging in this arbitrage? Is your answer affected by the fact that the government of China requires a visa for Shenzhen residents to visit Hong Kong and regulates the number of trips that can be made between the two cities in a given year? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Arbitrage in this context means purchasing goods in Hong Kong where they’re cheaper and selling them in Shenzhen at a higher price, thus profiting from the price difference. This action over time tends to balance out prices in disparate markets. While regulations such as visa requirements and limitations on travel may slow down the speed of this price harmonization, they don’t eliminate the opportunity for arbitrage completely unless the costs overshadow potential profits.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Price Arbitrage

Arbitrage in economic context means the simultaneous buying and selling of the same goods or securities in different markets to take advantage of price differences. When the article mentions that individuals can 'arbitrage these price differences', it means that people can buy goods in Hong Kong where prices are lower and sell them in Shenzhen where prices are higher, thus making a profit from the price disparity.
02

Possible Outcomes of Arbitrage

In Economics, arbitrage plays a crucial role in ensuring that prices do not deviate substantially from fair value for long periods of time. With many individuals taking part in this arbitrage, over time the prices in Shenzhen and Hong Kong should start to converge. This is due to the increased demand for goods in Hong Kong driving up prices, and the increased supply of those same goods in Shenzhen driving down prices.
03

Effect of Government Regulations

The requirement of visa for Shenzhen's residents to visit Hong Kong, along with the regulation of the number of trips that can be made, may slow down or restrict the arbitrage activity. Due to these restrictions, the frequency and quantity of goods being transported for arbitrage could be limited, thus slowing the speed at which price convergence would occur. Yet, these restrictions do not eliminate the opportunity for arbitrage, unless the cost associated with obtaining a visa and the limitation on travel exceed the potential profit from arbitrage.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Price Disparity
Price disparity occurs when the price of a particular good or service differs between two different markets. In the case of Shenzhen and Hong Kong, goods can have different price tags due to a variety of factors such as:
  • Supply and Demand: If a product is scarce in Shenzhen but abundant in Hong Kong, it is natural for the product to be more expensive in Shenzhen.
  • Transport Costs: Moving goods between these cities incurs costs, influencing final prices.
  • Taxes and Tariffs: Different tax and duty structures can lead to price differences as well.
When price disparity exists, it presents an opportunity for buying in the cheaper market and selling in the costlier one to make a profit. This exploitation of price differences is known as price arbitrage, a crucial mechanism in aligning price imbalances across markets.
Market Regulation
Market regulation refers to the actions by a governing body to control or influence the market's actions often to ensure fairness, competition, and efficiency. In the context of the movement of goods between Shenzhen and Hong Kong:
  • Visa Requirements: The Chinese government's need for visas and regulation of the number of trips Shenzhen residents make to Hong Kong is a form of market regulation. This limits the ease with which arbitrage can occur, potentially stabilizing disruptive economic activities.
  • Trade Policies: By setting these limits, governments can theoretically protect local markets or stabilize economic outcomes.
Market regulation impacts how quickly or effectively arbitrage can balance prices. Too stringent regulations might hinder the natural market processes of price adjustment.
Economic Outcomes
Economic outcomes are the changes within the economy resulting from specific activities, like arbitrage. Potential economic outcomes of arbitrage between Shenzhen and Hong Kong include:
  • Price Convergence: Products in Shenzhen may gradually decrease in price, while prices in Hong Kong might increase due to shifting supply and demand dynamics.
  • Efficiency Enhancements: Through arbitrage, resources are allocated more efficiently as price disparities narrow, potentially leading to improved economic welfare.
  • Regulatory Impact: If regulations are overly restrictive, the anticipated outcome of price convergence might be delayed or minimized, affecting overall market efficiency.
Although arbitrage can foster beneficial economic outcomes, it is essential that it operates within a balanced regulatory framework to ensure these benefits are not undermined by too much market control.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When asked what was most valuable about the big data Disney was collecting from its MagicBands program, the executive in charge of the program stated, "The biggest value comes from being able to segment customers into better, smarter segments so you know what is going on and can act on those segments." Briefly explain his reasoning.

A review of Kappo Masa, a popular restaurant in New York City, noted, "The markup that New York restaurants customarily add to retail wine and sake prices is about 150 percent. The average markup at Kappo Masa is 200 percent to 300 percent." Even 150 percent is a much larger markup than the markups restaurants use to price the meals they serve. Why do restaurants use a higher markup for wine than for food, and why might a popular restaurant mark up the price of wine more than an average restaurant does?

What is price discrimination? Under what circumstances can a firm successfully practice price discrimination?

In early \(2017,\) a headline in the Wall Street Journal read: "Pricey Virtual- Reality Headsets Slow to Catch On." Is it possible that Sony, Facebook, and the other firms producing virtual-reality headsets were better off keeping prices high when initially offering them for sale, even if the result was a smaller quantity sold? Briefly explain.

A columnist on forbes.com offered the following advice to retailers practicing price discrimination: "Consumers don't much like the idea of other people getting better deals than are offered to them, and retailers need to be careful not to turn differentiated pricing into discriminatory pricing. There has to be a legal and ethical rationale for offering different prices to different customers." What would be a legally acceptable reason for offering different prices to different customers? What would be a legally unacceptable reason? Are there situations in which price discrimination might be legally acceptable but ethically unacceptable? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.