/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 The late Nobel Prize-winning eco... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The late Nobel Prize-winning economist George Stigler once wrote, "the most common and most important criticism of perfect competition ... [is] that it is unrealistic." If few firms sell identical products in markets where there are no barriers to entry, why do economists believe that the model of perfect competition is important?

Short Answer

Expert verified
While unreal in practice, perfect competition is crucial in economic theory as it represents an 'ideal' benchmark against which real market structures are measured. It is used to show the potential of maximized social welfare and the most efficient use of resources.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Perfect Competition

Perfect Competition is a theoretical market structure characterized by a large number of small firms selling identical products, with no barriers to entry or exit. This means that each firm operates so that it has no control over the market prices--they are price takers. All the firms produce at the market price, and there is complete information and perfect mobility of resources.
02

Identifying the Unreality of Perfect Competition

In reality, exact conditions of perfect competition are hardly met. You are unlikely to see a large number of firms selling identical products, and there are always some barriers to entry or exit in any market. Hence, in practical terms, perfect competition is unrealistic. However, it provides a competitive benchmark.
03

Significance of Perfect Competition

Despite its unrealistic assumptions, perfect competition provides an economic model against which other, more complex market structures can be compared. It is seen as a theoretical 'ideal' where resources are efficiently allocated, and consumer and producer surplus are maximized. In other words, it represents an extreme case where social welfare is optimized.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Market Structures
Market structures describe how markets are organized based on the number of suppliers, degree of competition, and types of products offered. Structurally, markets can be classified into several distinct forms such as perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly.

In a perfectly competitive market, the products are homogeneous, and numerous buyers and sellers participate, meaning no single entity can influence the price. This contrasts with a monopoly where one firm dominates, an oligopoly where a few firms have significant control, or a monopolistic competition where many firms sell differentiated products.

Understanding these structures is crucial as they vastly affect the pricing strategy, market power, and economic outcomes in terms of efficiency and consumer welfare.
Economic Models
Economic models are simplified representations of the real world that economists use to explain and predict economic phenomena. These models are built on a set of assumptions that simplify complex realities to focus on essential aspects of the economy.

For instance, the perfect competition model assumes an ideal marketplace with innumerable buyers and sellers and no barriers to entry. Despite its lack of realism, this model is valuable for illustrating concepts like resource allocation and the balance of supply and demand in a free market. Furthermore, it serves as a standard to which actual market conditions can be compared to measure the level of competition and efficiency.
Resource Allocation
Resource allocation refers to the assignment of available resources to various uses in the most effective way. It's central to economics because it deals with the distribution of scarce resources to satisfy unlimited wants.

In the context of perfect competition, resource allocation is deemed optimal. This is because the forces of supply and demand, uninhibited by regulation or barriers to entry, guide the production of goods and services towards what consumers need or desire the most. As a result, businesses only produce goods that are in demand, preventing waste and inefficiency.
Consumer Surplus
Consumer surplus is the difference between the total amount that consumers are willing and able to pay for a good or service and the total amount that they actually pay.

In a perfectly competitive market, the price is dictated by the intersection of supply and demand. Because of this, consumers often pay less for goods than what they would have been willing to pay, resulting in consumer surplus. This concept emphasizes the economic benefit gained by consumers when they purchase goods at a market price that's lower than the highest price they're willing to pay.
Producer Surplus
Producer surplus mirrors consumer surplus but from the producers' perspective. It is the gap between the price at which producers are willing to sell a product, due to the cost of production, and the higher market price they actually receive.

In the model of perfect competition, producer surplus is maximized when firms operate at their most efficient production level. This happens because the market price—where marginal cost equals marginal benefit—is the price at which all goods are sold, thus the surplus is the difference between this market price and lower individual costs of production for more efficient producers.
Barriers to Entry
Barriers to entry are obstacles that make it difficult for new firms to enter a market. These can include high startup costs, complex regulations, brand loyalty, or exclusive access to technology.

Under perfect competition, these barriers are absent, allowing any firm to enter or exit without significant obstacle. However, in reality, barriers to entry tend to prevent markets from being perfectly competitive. Recognizing and analyzing such barriers is important because they impact the level of competition, the ability of new entrants to compete with established firms, and can lead to market inefficiencies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In \(2015,\) cocoa prices rose 13 percent from the previous year, the fourth straight year in which prices increased. However, by the end of 2016 cocoa prices fell. Edward George, the head of research at Ecobank, commented, "Everyone's like, wow. There's a lot of cocoa out there." Much of the world's supply of cocoa beans is grown in West Africa. a. Assume that the market for cocoa beans is perfectly competitive and was in long-run equilibrium in 2012 . Draw two graphs: one showing the world market for cocoa beans and one showing the market for the cocoa beans grown by a representative farmer. b. Assume that there was an increase in the worldwide demand for chocolate in \(2013 .\) In the graphs you drew in part (a), show the short-run effect of the demand increase. c. Explain why the supply of cocoa beans increased and the price decreased in \(2016 .\) Show the effect of this increase in supply on the graphs you drew in part (b).

Draw a graph showing a firm that is operating at a loss in a perfectly competitive market. Be sure your graph includes the firm's demand curve, marginal revenue curve, marginal cost curve, average total cost curve, and average variable cost curve, and make sure to indicate the area representing the firm's loss.

According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, in 2007 the insurance company AXA Equitable signed a long-term lease on 2 million square feet of office space in a skyscraper on Sixth Avenue in Manhattan in New York City. In \(2013,\) AXA decided that it needed only 1.7 million square feet of office space, so it subleased 300,000 square feet of space to several other firms. Although AXA is paying a rent of \(\$ 88\) per square foot on all 2 million square feet it is leasing, it is only receiving \(\$ 40\) per square foot from the firms to which it is subleasing the 300,000 square feet. Briefly explain why AXA's actions might make economic sense in the short run. Would these actions make sense in the long run? Briefly explain.

An article in the Wall Street Journal discussing the financial results for General Electric Co. (GE) for the first quarter of 2017 reported that, compared with the same quarter in the previous year, the firm's revenue had fallen from \(\$ 27.94\) billion to \(\$ 27.66\) billion, while its profit had increased from \(\$ 228\) million to \(\$ 653\) million. How is it possible for GE's revenue to decrease but its profit to increase? Doesn't GE have to maximize its revenue to maximize its profit? Briefly explain.

Suppose an assistant professor of economics is earning a salary of \(\$ 75,000\) per year. One day she quits her job, sells \(\$ 100,000\) worth of bonds that had been earning 3 percent per year, and uses the funds to open a bookstore. At the end of the year, she shows an accounting profit of \(\$ 80,000\) on her income tax return. What is her economic profit?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.