/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 In studying the consumption of v... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In studying the consumption of very poor families in China, Robert Jensen and Nolan Miller found that in both Hunan and Gansu, "Giffen behavior is most likely to be found among a range of households that are poor (but not too poor or too rich)." a. What do Jensen and Miller mean by "Giffen behavior"? b. Why would the poorest of the poor be less likely than people with slightly higher incomes to exhibit this behavior? c. Why must a good make up a very large portion of consumers' budgets to be a Giffen good?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Giffen behavior refers to an economic situation where an increase in the price of a good leads to an increase in its demand, mostly associated with inferior goods. This behavior is less likely to be exhibited by the poorest people as severe budget constraints lead them to cheaper substitutes. A good must make up a large portion of consumers' budgets to be a Giffen good because only then can the income effect outweigh the substitution effect when prices rise, causing an increase in demand for the good.

Step by step solution

01

Explain Giffen behavior

Giffen behavior, or Giffen goods, refers to a concept in economics where an increase in the price of a good leads to an increase in demand for that particular good. It is a paradoxical situation that violates the law of demand. This happens particularly with inferior goods, products that are more in demand as customer's income decreases.
02

Explain behavior of poorest of the poor

The poorest of the poor are less likely to exhibit Giffen behavior due to their severe budget constraints. Given their low income, they are likely to opt for cheaper substitutes available in the market, rather than continuing to demand a good whose price has increased. Therefore, the demand for a Giffen good, in this case, falls rather than increasing as Giffen behavior suggests.
03

Explain the importance of the budget portion for a Giffen good

A good must represent a significant portion of consumers' budgets to qualify as a Giffen good because only then will the income effect outweigh the substitution effect when the price increases. This means that if the price of such a good increases and it forms a significant part of the consumer's budget, they have to cut back on the consumption of other goods, causing a rise in the demand for the Giffen good.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Law of Demand
The law of demand is a fundamental concept in economics which states that, all else being equal, an increase in the price of a good will typically lead to a decrease in the quantity demanded of that good. This relationship occurs because higher prices make an item less attractive to consumers, who may choose to buy less or look for alternatives. Conversely, when prices fall, people are usually more inclined to purchase more of an item. This principle is easy to see in everyday life. For example:
  • If the cost of concert tickets increases, fewer people may decide to attend.
  • Alternatively, if prices are reduced during a sale, more consumers may take advantage and purchase the on-sale products.
Though widely applicable, the law of demand has exceptions. One such exception is exemplified by Giffen goods, which do not adhere to this rule, as their demand goes up when their price increases. Understanding this paradox requires exploring concepts like inferior goods and the income effect.
Inferior Goods
Inferior goods are a category of products for which demand increases as the income of consumers falls, reversing the typical pattern seen with most goods. This is because, with lower income, consumers cannot afford more expensive alternatives, making cheaper, basic substitutes more appealing. A classic example of inferior goods includes essential items such as generic brand foods or public transit services. As a person's income decreases:
  • They might opt for these less expensive groceries instead of premium brands.
  • More people may choose to rely on public transport rather than owning a car.
In the context of Giffen behavior, the role of inferior goods is crucial. When the price of a prominent inferior good increases and it constitutes a large part of someone’s budget, the individual might forego other luxuries, leading to an odd increase in demand for that inferior good despite the price boost. This perceived anomaly is driven by the income effect.
Income Effect
The income effect describes how a change in the price of a good affects the purchasing power of an individual's income, thereby influencing the quantity demanded. When a price increase occurs, a consumer effectively has less disposable income, as more money is required to buy the same amount of goods, assuming there are no changes in income. For instance:
  • If the price of bread rises significantly, people may feel poorer because they need more money for bread and, thus, buy less overall.
  • However, if bread is a staple good in their diet, they might reduce consumption of other less essential items.
In cases of Giffen goods, this income effect can dominate the usual substitution effect, leading to increased demand despite higher prices. This particular scenario can mostly occur where the good takes up a significant share of the consumer's budget, forcing more significant adjustments in their purchasing habits.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 346) In 2012 , the San Francisco Giants Major League Baseball team signed pitcher Matt Cain to a contract that paid him a salary of \(\$ 20\) million per year from 2013 through 2017 . The annual salaries were all guaranteed, and the Giants had to pay Cain whether he performed well or not \(-\) and they had to pay him even if the team released him and he no longer played for the Giants. During \(2016,\) Cain pitched ineffectively, and at the beginning of the 2017 season, it was uncertain whether the Giants would keep him as a regular player. Giants General Manager Bobby Evans was quoted as saying that in the decision on Cain, his salary wasn't a factor: "It's really not about the money at this point." Is Evans's analysis correct? Should the salary the Giants are paying Cain matter in deciding whether to keep him on the team? Would the team's decision be affected if Cain were receiving the Major League Baseball minimum salary of \(\$ 535,000 ?\) Briefly explain.

In a forbes.com column, Patrick Rishe, an economist at Washington University, noted that in recent years, the National Football League has significantly expanded the number of games it broadcasts. As a result, he argued: "The NFL has oversaturated the market with its product.... TV ratings, consequently, have fallen. At least in part, diminishing marginal utility is a likely explanation as to why." Briefly explain his reasoning.

What is the definition of marginal utility? What is the law of diminishing marginal utility? Why is marginal utility more useful than total utility in consumer decision making?

Andrea grew up enjoying her Italian grandmother's homecooked meals. Chicken and pasta with meatballs were her favorite foods. But after Andrea graduated from college, found a job, and got married, she became a vegetarian and no longer ate chicken or meatballs. Briefly explain which of the following statements provides the most likely explanation of Andrea's decision to become a vegetarian: \(\bullet\) When Andrea was young, she was unrealistic about her future behavior. Therefore, she did not act rationally. \(\bullet\) Andrea was not working when she was young. After she graduated from college and became employed, her income rose. We can conclude that for Andrea, chicken, meatballs, and other meat products are inferior goods. \(\bullet\) Social influences explain Andrea's decision to become a vegetarian. More people, including celebrities from the entertainment field, have become vegetarians. Andrea became a vegetarian because she now feels a kinship with these celebrities, and being a vegetarian makes her appear to be fashionable.

Explain how a downward-sloping demand curve results from consumers adjusting their consumption choices to changes in price.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.