/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Use the following news clip to w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Use the following news clip to work. Bud and Wise are the only two producers of aniseed beer, a New Age product designed to displace root beer. Bud and Wise are trying to figure out how much of this new beer to produce. They know (i) If they both produce 10,000 gallons a day, they will make the maximum attainable joint economic profit of \(\$ 200,000\) a day, or \(\$ 100,000\) a day each. (ii) If either firm produces 20,000 gallons a day while the other produces 10,000 gallons a day, the one that produces 20,000 gallons will make an economic profit of \(\$ 150,000\) and the other will incur an economic loss of \(\$ 50,000\). (iii) If both produce 20,000 gallons a day, each firm will make zero economic profit. Construct a payoff matrix for the game that Bud and Wise must play.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Payoff matrix for Bud and Wise's production strategies.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the players and strategies

Identify the players involved and their potential strategies. In this problem, the players are Bud and Wise. The strategies available to each player are to either produce 10,000 gallons or 20,000 gallons of aniseed beer per day.
02

Determine the potential payoffs

Analyze the problem to determine the payoffs for each combination of strategies. These payoffs are given in the problem statement. If both produce 10,000 gallons, each makes \( \$ 100,000\). If one produces 20,000 gallons and the other 10,000 gallons, the one producing 20,000 makes \( \$ 150,000\) and the other incurs a loss of \( \$ 50,000\). If both produce 20,000 gallons, each makes zero profit.
03

Construct the payoff matrix

Arrange the payoffs into a matrix format, which maps out the outcomes based on the chosen strategies of Bud and Wise. The matrix should include all combinations of strategies and their corresponding payoffs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Payoff Matrix
In game theory, a payoff matrix is a crucial tool that helps us analyze the outcomes for different strategies chosen by players.
A payoff matrix outlines the rewards or payoffs for each player based on the choices they and their opponents make.
For instance, in the case of Bud and Wise, the payoff matrix helps us see how their decisions to produce either 10,000 or 20,000 gallons of aniseed beer affect their profits.

To build the matrix:
  • List the strategies on both rows and columns, representing each player's choices.
  • Fill in the cells with the economic profit for each outcome, considering the problem's given data.
For example, if both produce 10,000 gallons, each makes \(\text{\textdollar}100,000\). If one produces 20,000 and the other 10,000, the first makes \(\text{\textdollar}150,000\) while the other incurs a \(\text{\textdollar}50,000\) loss. If both produce 20,000, they both make zero profit.
The payoff matrix visually demonstrates these outcomes, providing a clear perspective on how different strategies impact player profits.
Strategic Decision-Making
Strategic decision-making is essential in game theory, as it involves players choosing their best possible actions based on the anticipated actions of others.
This idea means that each player must consider not just their own payoffs but also predict the opponent's moves.
In our Bud and Wise scenario, each company must decide how much beer to produce, well aware that their decision impacts both their own profit and the competition's.

Key consideration factors include:
  • The short and long-term economic implications of their decision.
  • The likelihood of their opponent choosing a certain strategy.
  • The overall market demand and industry standards.
You should consider all these when deciding strategically. For example, producing 20,000 gallons might bring immediate advantage if the other sticks to 10,000 gallons, but both choosing 20,000 gallons leads to zero profit.

Making strategic decisions requires players to use critical thinking and sometimes even psychological judgement to anticipate and outmaneuver their competitors, all of which can be reflected within a payoff matrix.鈥
Economic Profit
Economic profit is a measure of a company's financial success beyond the usual accounting profit.
It factors in opportunity costs, which are the potential gains missed when choosing one alternative over another.

For example, Bud and Wise are deciding on their beer production levels to optimize economic profit. If Bud increases production to 20,000 gallons while Wise sticks to 10,000, Bud's economic profit is \(\text{\textdollar}150,000\) vs Wise's loss of \(\text{\textdollar}50,000\).

  • Economic profit is crucial for assessing company performance beyond immediate profits or losses.
  • Helps businesses make more informed, long-term strategic decisions.
Understanding economic profit can reveal the true profitability of an action, taking both explicit and implicit costs into perspective. It allows businesses like Bud and Wise to understand the true impact of their strategic choices on profitability.
Nash Equilibrium
Nash Equilibrium is a fundamental concept in game theory that occurs when players in a game adopt strategies where no player can benefit by unilaterally changing their strategy.

In simpler terms, once Nash Equilibrium is reached, no player has an incentive to change their decision, assuming the other players remain constant.
In our Bud and Wise scenario, we have to analyze the payoff matrix to determine if there is an equilibrium point for their production strategies.

Let鈥檚 see the example outcomes:
If Bud and Wise both produce 10,000 gallons, they each make \(\text{\textdollar}100,000\) in profit. If they both produce 20,000 gallons, profit drops to zero.
  • At 10,000 gallons each, if either decides to produce more, it could lead to a loss for one and a suboptimal outcome for both.
  • At 20,000 gallons each, any unilateral change reduces production and increases the competitor's profit.
Thus, producing 10,000 gallons each can be a Nash Equilibrium because neither sees a benefit in changing their strategy unilaterally. Nash Equilibrium helps predict outcomes where mutual best responses optimize overall benefit.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the 1990 s, Reliance spent \(\$ 6\) billion to build a world-class oil refinery at Jamnagar, India. Now Reliance's expansion will make it the world's biggest producer of gasoline- 1.2 million gallons per day, or about \(5 \%\) of global capacity. Reliance plans to sell the gasoline in the United States and Europe where it's too expensive and politically difficult to build new refineries. The bulked-up Jamnagar will be able to move the market and singapore traders expect a drop in fuel prices as soon as it's going at full steam. Source: Fortune, April 28, 2008 a. Explain why the news clip implies that the gasoline market is not perfectly competitive. b. What barriers to entry might limit competition and allow Reliance to influence the price?

The Asian rice-exporting nations planned to discuss a proposal that they form a cartel. Ahead of the meeting, the countries said that the purpose of the rice cartel would be to contribute to ensuring food stability, not just in an individual country but also to address food shortages in the region and the world. The cartel will not hoard rice and raise prices when there are shortages. The Philippines says that it is a bad idea. It will create an oligopoly, and the cartel could price the grain out of reach for millions of people. Source: CNN, May 6,2008 a. Assuming the rice-exporting nations become a profit-maximizing colluding oligopoly, explain how they would influence the global market for rice and the world price of rice. b. Assuming the rice-exporting nations become a profit-maximizing colluding oligopoly, draw a graph to illustrate their influence on the global market for rice. c. Even in the absence of international antitrust laws, why might it be difficult for this cartel to successfully collude? Use the ideas of game theory to explain.

Use the following news clip to work. Bud and Wise are the only two producers of aniseed beer, a New Age product designed to displace root beer. Bud and Wise are trying to figure out how much of this new beer to produce. They know (i) If they both produce 10,000 gallons a day, they will make the maximum attainable joint economic profit of \(\$ 200,000\) a day, or \(\$ 100,000\) a day each. (ii) If either firm produces 20,000 gallons a day while the other produces 10,000 gallons a day, the one that produces 20,000 gallons will make an economic profit of \(\$ 150,000\) and the other will incur an economic loss of \(\$ 50,000\). (iii) If both produce 20,000 gallons a day, each firm will make zero economic profit. Find the Nash equilibrium of the game that Bud and Wise play.

Soapy Inc. and Suddies Inc., the only soappowder producers, collude and agree to share the market equally. If neither firm cheats, each makes \(\$ 1\) million. If one firm cheats, it makes \(\$ 1.5\) million, while the complier incurs a loss of \(\$ 0.5\) million. If both cheat, they break even. Neither firm can monitor the other's actions. a. What are the strategies in this game? Construct the payoff matrix for this game. b. If the game is played only once what is the equilibrium? Is it a dominant- strategy equilibrium? Explain.

All four leading U.S. airlines - American Airlines, Delta, United, and Southwest- are down about 10 percent from their respective highs set two weeks ago. The fall came after Southwest Airline's decision to increase fleet capacity 7 percent and American Airline's response that they will "compete aggressively" on price to retain customers from low-cost carriers resulting from capacity increases. Source: www.seekingalpha.com, June 1,2015 As implied in the news clip, what type of market best describes the U.S. airline industry?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.