/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Productivity growth, the Phillip... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Productivity growth, the Phillips curve, and the natural rate. (Braun, 1984 ; Ball and Moffitt, 2001 .) Let \(g_{t}\) be growth of output per worker in period \(t, \pi_{t}\) inflation, and \(\pi_{t}^{W}\) wage inflation. Suppose that initially \(g\) is constant and equal to \(g^{L}\) and that unemployment is at the level that causes inflation to be constant. \(g\) then rises permanently to \(g^{H}>g^{L}\). Describe the path of \(u_{r}\) that would keep price inflation constant for each of the following assumptions about the behavior of price and wage inflation. Assume \(\phi>0\) in all cases. (a) (The price-price Phillips curve.) \(\pi_{t}=\pi_{t-1}-\phi\left(u_{t}-\vec{u}\right), \pi_{t}^{w}=\pi_{t}+g_{t}\) (b) (The wage-wage Phillips curve.) \(\pi_{t}^{w}=\pi_{t-1}^{w}-\phi\left(u_{t}-\bar{u}\right), \pi_{t}=\pi_{t}^{w}-g_{t}\) (c) (The pure wage-price Phillips curve.) \(\pi_{t}^{w}=\pi_{t-1}-\phi\left(u_{t}-\bar{u}\right), \pi_{t}=\pi_{t}^{w}-g_{t}\) (d) (The wage-price Phillips curve with an adjustment for normal productivity growth.) \(\pi_{t}^{w}=\pi_{t-1}+\hat{g}_{t}-\phi\left(u_{t}-\vec{u}\right), \hat{g}_{t}=\rho \hat{g}_{t-1}+(1-\rho) g_{t}, \pi_{t}=\pi_{t}^{w}-g_{t} .\) Assume that \(0<\rho<1\) and that initially \(\hat{g}=g^{L}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In all cases, to keep price inflation constant, \( u_{r} \) decreases when \( g \) rises.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Initial Setup

We have initially constant growth of output per worker, \( g = g^{L} \), and unemployment, \( u \), is at a level where inflation is constant. We need to determine how \( u_{r} \) changes to maintain price inflation constant when \( g \) increases permanently to \( g^{H} > g^{L} \). The value \( \phi > 0 \) is a parameter indicating the responsiveness of inflation to unemployment.
02

Case (a): Analyzing the Price-Price Phillips Curve

The equation for price-price Phillips curve is given by \( \pi_{t} = \pi_{t-1} - \phi(u_{t} - \vec{u}) \) and \( \pi_{t}^{w} = \pi_{t} + g_{t} \). To keep \( \pi_{t} \) constant, \( u_{t} \) must stay equal to \( \vec{u} \), as any deviation will alter \( \pi_{t} \). Thus, \( u_{r} \) remains constant against the rise in \( g \).
03

Case (b): Analyzing the Wage-Wage Phillips Curve

Here, \( \pi_{t}^{w} = \pi_{t-1}^{w} - \phi(u_{t} - \bar{u}) \) and \( \pi_{t} = \pi_{t}^{w} - g_{t} \). To hold \( \pi_{t} \) constant as \( g_{t} \) increases, \( \pi_{t}^{w} \) must rise equivalently. Hence, \( u_{t} \) must decrease below \( \bar{u} \) to increase \( \pi_{t}^{w} \). This implies \( u_{r} \) must decrease.
04

Case (c): Analyzing the Pure Wage-Price Phillips Curve

For the pure wage-price Phillips curve, \( \pi_{t}^{w} = \pi_{t-1} - \phi(u_{t} - \bar{u}) \) and \( \pi_{t} = \pi_{t}^{w} - g_{t} \). To maintain constant price inflation as \( g_{t} \) increases, \( \pi_{t}^{w} \) needs to rise, which implies \( u_{t} \) must fall below \( \bar{u} \). Therefore, \( u_{r} \) decreases.
05

Case (d): Analyzing the Wage-Price Phillips Curve with Adjustment

In this scenario, we have \( \pi_{t}^{w} = \pi_{t-1} + \hat{g}_{t} - \phi(u_{t} - \vec{u}) \) with \( \hat{g}_{t} = \rho \hat{g}_{t-1} + (1 - \rho) g_{t} \), and \( \pi_{t} = \pi_{t}^{w} - g_{t} \). Initially, \( \hat{g} = g^{L} \). As \( g \) increases, \( \hat{g}_{t} \) becomes a weighted average. We need \( \pi_{t}^{w} \) to increase enough to counter \( g_{t} \); \( u_{t} \) must decrease to raise \( \pi_{t}^{w} \), leading to a decrease in \( u_{r} \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Phillips Curve
The Phillips curve is a key concept in macroeconomics that illustrates the inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation. Developed by A.W. Phillips in the late 1950s, the curve suggests that with lower unemployment, inflation tends to be higher, and vice versa.
The idea behind this curve is relatively straightforward:
  • As unemployment decreases, more people have jobs.
  • This leads to higher demand for goods and services.
  • Consequently, businesses could raise prices, leading to inflation.

However, the Phillips curve is not a simple, fixed rule. It has faced criticism and has been modified over time to incorporate factors such as expectations of future inflation. Despite these critiques, it's still a fundamental tool in understanding macroeconomic policy decisions and labor markets.
Productivity Growth
Productivity growth refers to the increase in the output produced per worker over time. It is a vital indicator of economic health because it leads to growth in the standard of living.
When productivity grows, it means:
  • More goods and services are produced without increasing the number of workers.
  • The economy can grow sustainably.
  • Incomes can rise without causing inflationary pressure.

In the context of the exercise, when productivity growth increases permanently, it poses challenges to maintaining stable inflation. With more output per worker, wage and price adjustments must be made carefully to keep inflation stable. A steady increase in productivity can lower the natural rate of unemployment without sparking inflation if managed well.
Natural Rate of Unemployment
The natural rate of unemployment is a concept denoting the level of unemployment that exists even when the economy is at full potential. It's the sum of frictional and structural unemployment, excluding cyclical factors.
This concept is important because:
  • It explains why zero unemployment is practically impossible.
  • It helps policymakers set realistic employment and economic goals.
  • It's used as a benchmark to evaluate labor market policies.

In the exercises concerning Phillips curves, the natural rate shifts based on changes in productivity and other factors. For instance, if productivity improves, the natural rate can decrease, allowing for more employment without triggering inflation. This dynamic adjustment aids in stabilizing the economy effectively.
Inflation
Inflation is the rate at which the general price level of goods and services rises, eroding purchasing power over time. It's a crucial economic indicator that affects both consumers and producers.
There are various causes of inflation:
  • Demand-pull inflation where high demand drives overall prices up.
  • Cost-push inflation where rising production costs lead to higher prices.
  • Built-in inflation stemming from adaptive expectations.

Maintaining stable inflation is a major goal of central banks. By doing so, they aim to promote economic stability and predictability. In the context of the provided exercise, the adjustments to unemployment in the Phillips curve aim to counter the changes in productivity to keep inflation constant.
Wage Inflation
Wage inflation refers to the general rise in wages across an economy. It's crucial as it influences consumer purchasing power and overall economic inflation. Wage inflation can be both a cause and a consequence of general inflation.
Key aspects of wage inflation include:
  • Rising wages increase consumer spending, potentially driving demand-led inflation.
  • It can lead to a cost-push effect if wages rise faster than productivity.
  • It's often tied closely to the labor market's tightness, reflecting how competitive or slack it is.

In the textbook exercise, wage inflation must be carefully balanced, particularly when productivity shifts. If wage increases do not align properly with productivity gains, it can challenge efforts to keep price inflation stable. This delicate balance is a hallmark of effective economic management.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The multiplier-accelerator. (Samuelson, \(1939 .\) ) Consider the following model of income determination. (1) Consumption depends on the previous period's income: \(C_{t}=a+b Y_{t-1} \cdot(2)\) The desired capital stock (or inventory stock) is proportional to the previous period's output: \(K_{t}^{*}=c Y_{t-1} \cdot(3)\) Investment equals the difference between the desired capital stock and the stock inherited from the previous period: \(I_{t}=K_{t}^{*}-K_{t-1}=K_{t}^{*}-c Y_{t-2^{*}}(4)\) Government purchases are constant: \(G_{t}=\bar{G}\) \(Y_{t}=C_{t}+I_{t}+G_{t}\) (a) Express \(Y_{t}\) in terms of \(Y_{t-1}, Y_{t-2},\) and the parameters of the model. (b) Suppose \(b=0.9\) and \(c=0.5 .\) Suppose there is a one-time disturbance to government purchases; specifically, suppose that \(G\) is equal to \(\bar{G}+1\) in period \(t\) and is equal to \(\bar{G}\) in all other periods. How does this shock affect output over time?

The Baumol-Tobin model. (Baumol, \(1952 ;\) Tobin, \(1956 .\) ) Consider a consumer with a steady flow of real purchases of amount \(\alpha Y, 0<\alpha \leq 1\), that are made with money. The consumer chooses how often to convert bonds, which pay a constant interest rate of \(i,\) into money, which pays no interest. If the consumer chooses an interval of \(\tau,\) his or her money holdings decline linearly from \(\alpha Y P \tau\) after each conversion to zero at the moment of the next conversion (here \(P\) is the price level, which is assumed constant). Each conversion has a fixed real cost of \(C .\) The consumer's problem is to choose \(\tau\) to minimize the average cost per unit time of conversions and foregone interest. (a) Find the optimal value of \(\tau\) (b) What are the consumer's average real money holdings? Are they decreasing in \(i\) and increasing in \(Y ?\) What is the elasticity of average money holdings with respect to \(i\) ? With respect to \(Y\) ?

Indexation. (This problem follows Ball, 1988 .) Suppose production at firm \(i\) is given by \(Y_{1}=S L_{i}^{a},\) where \(S\) is a supply shock and \(0<\alpha \leq 1\). Thus in \(\log s\), \(y_{i}=s+\alpha \ell_{i} .\) Prices are flexible; thus (setting the constant term to 0 for simplic. ity \(), p_{i}=w_{i}+(1-\alpha) \ell_{i}-s .\) Aggregating the output and price equations yields \(y=s+\alpha \ell\) and \(p=w+(1-\alpha) \ell-s .\) Wages are partially indexed to prices: \(w=\theta p\) where \(0 \leq \theta \leq 1 .\) Finally, aggregate demand is given by \(y=m-p . s\) and \(m\) are independent, mean-zero random variables with variances \(V_{s}\) and \(V_{m}\) (a) What are \(p, y, \ell,\) and \(w\) as functions of \(m\) and \(s\) and the parameters \(\alpha\) and \(\theta ?\) How does indexation affect the response of employment to monetary shocks? How does it affect the response to supply shocks? (b) What value of \(\theta\) minimizes the variance of employment? (c) Suppose the demand for a single firm's output is \(y_{i}=y-\eta\left(p_{i}-p\right) .\) Suppose all firms other than firm \(i\) index their wages by \(w=\theta p\) as before, but that firm \(i\) indexes its wage by \(w_{1}=\theta_{1} p .\) Firm \(i\) continues to set its price as \(p_{i}=w_{i}+\) \((1-\alpha) \ell_{1}-s .\) The production function and the pricing equation then imply that \(y_{i}=y-\phi\left(w_{i}-w\right),\) where \(\phi=\alpha \eta /[\alpha+(1-\alpha) \eta]\) (i) What is employment at firm \(i, \ell_{i},\) as a function of \(m, s, \alpha, \eta, \theta,\) and \(\theta_{i}\) ? (ii) What value of \(\theta\), minimizes the variance of \(\ell_{1}\) ? (iii) Find the Nash equilibrium value of \(\theta\). That is, find the value of \(\theta\) such that if aggregate indexation is given by \(\theta\), the representative firm minimizes the variance of \(\ell_{i}\) by setting \(\theta_{i}=\theta\). Compare this value with the value found in part (b).

The analysis of Case 1 in Section 6.2 assumes that employment is determined by labor demand, Under perfect competition, however, employment at a given real wage will equal the minimum of demand and supply; this is known as the short- side rule. Draw diagrams showing the situation in the labor market when employment is determined by the short-side rule if: (a) \(P\) is at the level that generates the maximum possible output. (b) \(P\) is above the level that generates the maximum possible output.

Observational equivalence. (Sargent, 1976 .) Suppose that the money supply is determined by \(m_{t}=c^{\prime} z_{t-1}+e_{t},\) where \(c\) and \(z\) are vectors and \(e_{t}\) is an iid. disturbance uncorrelated with \(z_{1-1} \cdot e_{t}\) is unpredictable and unobservable. Thus the expected component of \(m_{t}\) is \(c^{\prime} z_{t-1},\) and the unexpected component is \(e_{t}\) In setting the money supply, the Federal Reserve responds only to variables that matter for real activity; that is, the variables in z directly affect \(y\) Now consider the following two models: (i) Only unexpected money matters, so \(y_{i}=a^{\prime} z_{i-1}+b e_{i}+v_{i} ;(i i)\) all money matters, so \(y_{t}=\alpha^{\prime} z_{t-1}+\beta m_{t}+v_{t} .\) In each specification, the disturbance is \(\mathrm{i}\) id and uncorrelated with \(\mathrm{z}_{t-1}\) and \(e_{t}\) (a) Is it possible to distinguish between these two theories? That is, given a candidate set of parameter values under, say, model ( \(i\) ), are there parameter values under model (ii) that have the same predictions? Explain. (b) Suppose that the Federal Reserve also responds to some variables that do not directly affect output; that is, suppose \(m_{t}=c^{\prime} z_{t-1}+\gamma^{\prime} w_{t-1}+e_{t}\) and that models ( \(i\) ) and (ii) are as before (with their distubances now uncorrelated with \(w_{t-1}\) as well as with \(z_{t-1}\) and \(e_{t}\) ). In this case, is it possible to distinguish between the two theories? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.