Chapter 0: Q34P (page 1)
Let is a single-tape TM that never modifies the portion of the tape that contains the input w. Is X decidable? Prove your answer.
Short Answer
X is undecidable.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 0: Q34P (page 1)
Let is a single-tape TM that never modifies the portion of the tape that contains the input w. Is X decidable? Prove your answer.
X is undecidable.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Let. Use the result of Problem 7.47 to show that MAX-CLIQUEis DP-complete.
Use the recursion theorem to give an alternative proof of Rice’s theorem in Problem 5.28.
Show that the set of incompressible strings contains no infinite subset that is Turing-recognizable.
Give a formal definition of an enumerator. Consider it to be a type of two-tape Turing machine that uses its second tape as the printer. Include a definition of the enumerated language
Myhill–Nerode theorem. Refer to Problem . Let L be a language and let X be a set of strings. Say that X is pairwise distinguishable by L if every two distinct strings in X are distinguishable by L. Define the index of L to be the maximum number of elements in any set that is pair wise distinguishable by L . The index of L may be finite or infinite.
a. Show that if L is recognized by a DFA with k states, L has index at most k.
b. Show that if the index of L is a finite number K , it is recognized by a DFA with k states.
c. Conclude that L is regular iff it has finite index. Moreover, its index is the size of the smallest DFA recognizing it.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.