Chapter 10: Problem 14
What undesirable dependencies are avoided when a relation is in \(2 \mathrm{NF}\) ?
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 10: Problem 14
What undesirable dependencies are avoided when a relation is in \(2 \mathrm{NF}\) ?
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Consider the following relation for published books: BOOK (Book_title, Authorname, Book_type, Listprice, Author_affil, Publisher) Author_affil refers to the affliation of author. Suppose the following dependencies exist: Book_title \(\rightarrow\) Publisher, Book_type Book_type \(\rightarrow\) Listprice Authorname \(\rightarrow\) Author-affil a. What normal form is the relation in? Explain your answer. b. Apply normalization until you cannot decompose the relations further. State the reasons behind each decomposition.
Define first, second, and third normal forms when only primary keys are considered. How do the general definitions of \(2 \mathrm{NF}\) and \(3 \mathrm{NF}\), which consider all keys of a relation, differ from those that consider only primary keys?
What is meant by the completeness and soundness of Armstrong's inference rules?
Prove that any relation schema with two attributes is in BCNF.
What does the term unnormalized relation refer to? How did the normal forms develop historically from first normal form up to Boyce-Codd normal form?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.