/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 27 When a file is transferred betwe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

When a file is transferred between two computers, two acknowledgement strategies are possible. In the first one, the file is chopped up into packets, which are individually acknowledged by the receiver, but the file transfer as a whole is not acknowledged. In the second one, the packets are not acknowledged individually, but the entire file is acknowledged when it arrives. Discuss these two approaches.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Packet-by-packet is safer but slower; full file is faster but riskier.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Packet Acknowledgement

In the first strategy, each packet that makes up the file is acknowledged individually by the receiver. This means that once a packet is successfully received, a signal is sent back to the sender to confirm its receipt.
02

Analyzing Packet-by-Packet Acknowledgement

This method ensures that every part of the file has been received correctly. If a packet is lost or corrupted, it can be retransmitted without starting over from the beginning. However, this approach can be slower due to the additional overhead of sending acknowledgements for each packet.
03

Understanding Full File Acknowledgement

The second strategy acknowledges only the complete file after all packets have been received and reassembled. A single acknowledgement is sent once the entire file is confirmed as received.
04

Analyzing Full File Acknowledgement

This approach can be more efficient as fewer acknowledgements are sent, reducing overhead. However, if any part of the file is lost or corrupted during transmission, the entire file needs to be resent, which can be a problem for large files and unreliable connections.
05

Comparing Strategies

The choice between these strategies depends on the reliability of the network and the size of the file. Packet-by-packet acknowledgement is safer for unreliable networks but slower, while full file acknowledgement is faster but riskier.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Packet Acknowledgement
When data is sent over a network, particularly large files, breaking the data into smaller units called packets is a common practice. Packet acknowledgement is a crucial part of ensuring data integrity during this process. In a network environment, packet acknowledgement refers to sending a confirmation back to the sender that a packet has been successfully received by the receiver. This confirmation, often termed an ACK, lets the sending computer know that it can proceed to send the next packet.

This strategy, where each individual packet is acknowledged, offers a significant advantage: it minimizes data re-transmission. If a particular packet is lost or becomes corrupted during its journey across the network, only that packet needs to be resent. This reduces the amount of data that needs to be retransmitted, saving time and bandwidth. However, the downside is that it can introduce latency and increase network traffic. Each packet requires an acknowledgement, which adds overhead and communication between sender and receiver. This can make the process slower, especially over long distances or slow networks.
File Transfer Protocols
File Transfer Protocols are crucial in ensuring that files of all types and sizes reach their destination safely and intact. The methods by which files are sent, such as FTP, SFTP, and HTTP, often leverage different strategies for managing acknowledgments.

Protocols like FTP and SFTP utilize packet acknowledgement and full-file acknowledgement methods, but the choice depends on their configuration and the needs of the network. FTP (File Transfer Protocol) is one of the older protocols that can use either acknowledgment strategy based on setup, whereas SFTP (SSH File Transfer Protocol) is typically more secure and might favor packet acknowledgements for reinforced reliability.
  • The primary role of these protocols is to make sure that the files arrive undistorted and in their entirety.
  • Depending on the setup, these protocols can offer either speed or reliability, which directly affects how acknowledgement strategies are implemented.
  • Protocol choice may depend on factors like file size, network reliability, and security requirements.
Understanding these protocols helps in selecting the appropriate method to ensure a reliable and efficient file transfer.
Reliable Data Transmission
Reliable data transmission is vital in today’s digital world where the accuracy of information exchange is crucial. When a file transfer is initiated, ensuring that data arrives accurately and without loss is a primary objective. Reliability in data transmission can be influenced by the method of acknowledgement chosen.

Two common strategies include packet acknowledgement and full-file acknowledgement. Reliable data transmission involves mechanisms to handle data loss, errors, and potential corruption during transmission. Packet acknowledge strategies contribute immensely because they permit error-checking at a more granular level. If an error is detected in a specific packet, only that packet is re-sent rather than the entire file.

Choosing the right strategy hinges on understanding the environment’s needs:
  • For high-liability data transmissions over unreliable networks, packet-by-packet acknowledgements offer enhanced reliability by ensuring each piece of data is accounted for.
  • For setups where speed is crucial and the network is reliable, full-file acknowledgements can reduce overhead and improve transmission speed.
In conclusion, achieving reliable data transmission involves balancing speed, reliability, and resource use based on the environment's requirements.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The performance of a client-server system is strongly influenced by two major network characteristics: the bandwidth of the network (i.e., how many bits/sec it can transport) and the latency (i.e., how many seconds it takes for the first bit to get from the client to the server). Give an example of a network that exhibits high bandwidth but also high latency. Then give an example of one that has both low bandwidth and low latency.

The president of the Specialty Paint Corp. gets the idea to work with a local beer brewer to produce an invisible beer can (as an anti-litter measure). The president tells her legal department to look into it, and they in turn ask engineering for help. As a result, the chief engineer calls his counterpart at the brewery to discuss the technical aspects of the project. The engineers then report back to their respective legal departments, which then confer by telephone to arrange the legal aspects. Finally, the two corporate presidents discuss the financial side of the deal. What principle of a multilayer protocol in the sense of the OSI model does this communication mechanism violate?

Now that almost everyone has a home computer or mobile device connected to a computer network, instant public referendums on important pending legislation will become possible. Ultimately, existing legislatures could be eliminated, to let the will of the people be expressed directly. The positive aspects of such a direct democracy are fairly obvious; discuss some of the negative aspects.

Two networks each provide reliable connection-oriented service. One of them offers a reliable byte stream and the other offers a reliable message stream. Are these identical? If so, why is the distinction made? If not, give an example of how they differ.

A group of \(2^{n}-1\) routers are interconnected in a centralized binary tree, with a router at each tree node. Router \(i\) communicates with router \(j\) by sending a message to the root of the tree. The root then sends the message back down to \(j\). Derive an approximate expression for the mean number of hops per message for large \(n\), assuming that all router pairs are equally likely.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.