/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 Suppose that between \(A\) and \... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that between \(A\) and \(B\) there is a router \(R\). The \(A-R\) bandwidth is infinite (that is, packets are not delayed), but the R-B link introduces a bandwidth delay of 1 packet per second (that is, 2 packets take 2 seconds, etc.). Acknowledgments from \(\mathrm{B}\) to \(\mathrm{R}\), though, are sent instantaneously. \(\mathrm{A}\) sends data to \(\mathrm{B}\) over a \(\mathrm{TCP}\) connection, using slow start but with an arbitrarily large window size. R has a queue size of 1 , in addition to the packet it is sending. At each second, the sender first processes any arriving ACKs and then responds to any timeouts. (a) Assuming a fixed TimeOut period of 2 seconds, what is sent and received for \(\mathrm{T}=0,1, \ldots, 6\) seconds? Is the link ever idle due to timeouts? (b) What changes if TimeOut is 3 seconds instead?

Short Answer

Expert verified
With a 2-second timeout, packets are resent on timeout, causing possible idle periods. With a 3-second timeout, the system can handle delays better, reducing idle periods.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

Identify the elements in the network: Sender (A), Router (R), and Receiver (B). The R-B link introduces a delay of 1 second per packet, while the A-R link has no delay. Router R can hold a maximum of 1 packet in its queue, in addition to the packet it is sending.
02

Initial State and Slow Start Mechanism

At the start (T=0), initialize the TCP slow start process with an initial congestion window size of 1 packet. A sends the first packet to R.
03

Timing Analysis for T=0 to T=2 with 2-Second Timeout

At T=0, A sends packet 1 to R and R immediately sends it to B. At T=1, packet 1 reaches B and B sends an ACK back to A, arriving instantaneously. A responds by sending two packets (due to slow start). At T=2, R sends packet 2 (queued from T=1) to B, and R queues packet 3.
04

Handling TimeOut and Response for T=2 to T=4

At T=2, if no ACKs are received by T=2+2=4, A times out and resends packet 3. At T=3, packet 2 reaches B and B sends an ACK, arriving instantly at A. A processes the ACK and sends packets 4 and 5.
05

Continuing the Analysis for T=4 to T=6

At T=4, packet 3 successfully reaches B and ACK is sent back to A. At T=5, router R sends packet 4 to B and queues packet 5. At T=6, R sends packet 5 to B.
06

Analyzing Link Idle Periods

Review the timeline to find any idle periods. Due to the router's queue and the 2-second timeout, there is potential idle time if ACKs are not received on time, particularly visible around T=4 before acknowledging the successful transmission.
07

Changing TimeOut Period to 3 Seconds

Analyze the scenario with TimeOut set to 3 seconds instead of 2. The changes mostly affect the timeout handling. For example, A waits until T=5 before retransmitting a packet if no ACK is received, reducing the likelihood of idle periods caused by timeout triggers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Network Delay
The concept of network delay is crucial when understanding TCP communication. In our given scenario, the delay is introduced by the R-B link, where each packet takes one second to travel from the router (R) to the receiver (B). This can be generalized to other network situations where data does not flow instantaneously from sender to receiver.
When data packets are sent across a network, they navigate various routes and encounter different types of delays. These delays can be:
  • Transmission delay: Time taken to push all bits of the packet onto the wire
  • Propagation delay: Time taken for a signal to travel through the medium
  • Processing delay: Time routers take to process packet headers
  • Queueing delay: Time a packet spends waiting in queue before being transmitted
In our case, the R-B link has a constant delay of 1 second per packet. Therefore, if multiple packets are queued, they take multiple seconds to reach their destination. This delay must be accounted for when calculating the timing of events like acknowledgments and timeouts. Understanding and managing these delays is crucial to ensure efficient network performance.
Packet Acknowledgment
Packet acknowledgment is an essential component of TCP's reliable data transfer mechanism. When a receiver (B) successfully receives a packet from the sender (A), it sends back an acknowledgment (ACK) to inform the sender that the packet arrived safely.
In our scenario, acknowledgments are sent instantaneously from B back to A. This means that as soon as B receives a packet, the ACK reaches A without any delay. This instant feedback is crucial for the sender to know whether it should continue sending more packets or if it needs to resend any packets due to errors or losses.
Here's how packet acknowledgment works in our given scenario:
  • At T=1, the first packet reaches B, and an ACK is instantly sent back to A.
  • At T=3, the second packet reaches B, and again an ACK is sent instantly to A.
By receiving ACKs, A updates its understanding of which packets have been successfully delivered and adjusts its transmission strategy accordingly. This mechanism ensures data integrity and helps manage flow control, avoiding congestion in the network.
Timeout Period
The timeout period in TCP is the duration the sender waits for an acknowledgment from the receiver before assuming the packet was lost and resending it. This period is critical in managing the network's reliability and performance.
In our exercise, we explore two different timeout periods: 2 seconds and 3 seconds. Let's examine how they impact the transmission:
  • With a 2-second timeout, if A does not receive an ACK by T=2, it resends the packet. For instance, if no ACK is received by T=4 for the second packet, A resends it.
  • With a 3-second timeout, A waits until T=3 before resending. This longer wait period reduces the chance of unnecessary packet resends due to momentary delays but can introduce idle periods if the ACK arrives just after the timeout.
Choosing an appropriate timeout period is a balancing act. A shorter timeout can lead to unnecessary retransmissions, increasing network load. A longer timeout can create delays, reducing overall network efficiency. Understanding how to set this parameter based on the network's characteristics and delay patterns is key to optimizing TCP performance. In practice, TCP uses an adaptive algorithm to adjust the timeout dynamically, but in academic exercises, fixed periods help illustrate the underlying principles.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Give an argument why the congestion-control problem is better managed at the internet level than the ATM level, at least when only part of the internet is ATM. In an exclusively IP-over-ATM network, is congestion better managed at the cell level or at the TCP level? Why?

Suppose you are downloading a large file over a 3-KBps phone link. Your software displays an average-bytes-per-second counter. How will TCP congestion control and occasional packet losses cause this counter to fluctuate? Assume that only a third, say, of the total RTT is spent on the phone link.

During linear increase, TCP computes an increment to the congestion window as Increment \(=\mathrm{MSS} \times(\mathrm{MSS} /\) CongestionWindow \()\) Explain why computing this increment each time an ACK arrives may not result in the correct increment. Give a more precise definition for this increment. (Hint: A given ACK can acknowledge more or less than one MSS's worth of data.)

Suppose a router's drop policy is to drop the highest-cost packet whenever queues are full, where it defines the "cost" of a packet to be the product of its size by the time remaining that it will spend in the queue. (Note that in calculating cost it is equivalent to use the sum of the sizes of the earlier packets in lieu of remaining time.) (a) What advantages and disadvantages might such a policy offer, compared to tail drop? (b) Give an example of a sequence of queued packets for which dropping the highest-cost packet differs from dropping the largest packet. (c) Give an example where two packets exchange their relative cost ranks as time progresses.

Suppose two hosts \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{B}\) are connected via a router \(\mathrm{R}\). The \(\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{R}\) link has infinite bandwidth; the \(R-B\) link can send one packet per second. \(R\) 's queue is infinite. Load is to be measured as the number of packets per second sent from A to B. Sketch the throughput-versus-load and delay-versus-load graphs, or if a graph cannot be drawn, explain why. Would another way to measure load be more appropriate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.