/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 Monty Hall's dilemma: a game sho... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Monty Hall's dilemma: a game show problem. You are a contestant on a game show. There are three closed doors: one hides a car and two hide goats. You point to one door, call it \(C\). The gameshow host, knowing what's behind each door, now opens either door \(A\) or \(B\), to show you a goat; say it's door \(A\). To win a car, you now get to make your final choice: should you stick with your original choice \(C\), or should you now switch and choose door B? (New York Times, July 21, 1991; Scientific American, August 1998.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
You should switch to door B because it gives you a 2/3 chance of winning the car, compared to a 1/3 chance if you stay with door C.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the problem

You initially choose one of three doors (door C). A goat is revealed behind one of the other two doors you didn't choose (let's say door A). You must decide whether to stick with your original choice (door C) or switch to the remaining door (door B) to maximize your chances of winning the car.
02

Calculate the initial probabilities

When you first choose a door, you have a 1/3 chance that the car is behind your chosen door (door C) and a 2/3 chance that the car is behind one of the other two doors.
03

Consider the host's action

After you choose door C, the host reveals a goat behind one of the remaining doors, say door A. This changes the information you have and the probabilities of where the car might be.
04

Calculate probabilities if you switch

If the car was behind door A or door B (with initial probability 2/3), the host will reveal a goat behind the other door, leaving the car behind the remaining door (here, door B). So, if you switch to door B, you have a 2/3 chance of winning the car.
05

Calculate probabilities if you stay

If you stay with your original choice (door C), your probability of winning the car remains 1/3 because your initial choice would only be correct 1/3 of the time.
06

Conclusion

Switching to door B gives you a higher probability of winning the car (2/3) compared to sticking with your original choice, door C (1/3). Therefore, you should switch to door B to maximize your chances of winning the car.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Theory and the Monty Hall Problem
Probability theory helps us make sense of uncertain events and calculate the likelihood of different outcomes. In the Monty Hall problem, we encounter a scenario with three doors. Initially, each door has an equal probability of hiding the car: 1/3. Once the host reveals a goat, these probabilities change based on new information.
When you first choose a door, the car could be either behind the door you picked (1/3 probability) or one of the other two doors (2/3 probability). The host, knowing where the car is, always reveals a goat, and this action helps us update our probabilities.
Switching doors effectively means embracing the higher probability. If you switch, you rely on the initial higher likelihood that the car is behind one of the other two doors (2/3). Therefore, you increase your chances of winning by choosing the door the host did not reveal.
Game Theory Insights
Game theory studies strategic decision-making, where outcomes depend on the choices of all participants. The Monty Hall problem is a perfect example, involving you and the host.
The host's actions are crucial within the game. By revealing a goat, they provide valuable information about where the car is more likely to be. As a contestant, your strategy should adapt to this information. Game theory tells us to maximize payoffs and minimize risks. Here, by switching doors, you capitalize on the changing probabilities, boosting your odds of winning from 1/3 to 2/3.
In essence, understanding the host's intentions and reactions is key in game theory. Knowing the host will always reveal a goat makes switching a strategic move, aligning with game theory principles to maximize success in uncertain conditions.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty
In many situations, including the Monty Hall problem, we face decisions without certainty. Decision-making under uncertainty involves analyzing risks and potential outcomes. Initially, it might seem your chances of winning are equal, whether you stay or switch. However, deeper analysis reveals switching significantly increases your odds.
Here's why: When you chose door C initially, there was a 1/3 chance of picking the car and a 2/3 chance it was behind doors A or B. When the host shows a goat behind door A, the situation changes. Now, with door A eliminated, the 2/3 probability that the car was not behind your initial choice shifts to door B.
Effective decision-making leverages this updated information. By choosing to switch, you act on the improved chances of winning. Evaluating and responding to new data—like the host's reveal—demonstrate good decision-making skills in the face of uncertainty.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sports and weather. The San Francisco football team plays better in fair weather. They have a \(70 \%\) chance of winning in good weather, but only a \(20 \%\) chance of winning in bad weather. (a) If they play in the Super Bowl in Wisconsin and the weatherman predicts a \(60 \%\) chance of snow that day, what is the probability that San Francisco will win? (b) Given that San Francisco lost, what is the probability that the weather was bad?

The probability of a sequence (given a composition). A scientist has constructed a secret peptide to carry a message. You know only the composition of the peptide, which is six amino acids long. It contains one serine \(\mathbf{S}\), one threonine \(\mathbf{T}\), one cysteine \(\mathbf{C}\), one arginine \(\mathbf{R}\), and two glutamates \(\mathbf{E}\). What is the probability that the sequence SECRET will occur by chance?

Probability and translation-start codons. In prokaryotes, translation of mRNA messages into proteins is most often initiated at start codons on the mRNA having the sequence AUG. Assume that the mRNA is single-stranded and consists of a sequence of bases, each described by a single letter A, C, U, or G. Consider the set of all random pieces of bacterial mRNA of length six bases. (a) What is the probability of having either no A's or no U's in the mRNA sequence of six base pairs long? (b) What is the probability of a random piece of mRNA having exactly one \(\mathbf{A}\), one \(\mathbf{U}\), and one \(\mathbf{G}\) ? (c) What is the probability of a random piece of mRNA of length six base pairs having an A directly followed by a U directly followed by a G; in other words, having an AUG in the sequence? (d) What is the total number of random pieces of mRNA of length six base pairs that have exactly one \(\mathbf{A}\), exactly one \(\mathbf{U}\), and exactly one \(\mathbf{G}\), with \(\mathbf{A}\) appearing first, then the \(\mathbf{U}\), then the \(\mathbf{G}\) ? (e.g., AXXUXG)

Predicting the rate of mutation based on the Poisson probability distribution function. The evolutionary process of amino acid substitution in proteins is sometimes described by the Poisson probability distribution function. The probability \(p_{s}(t)\) that exactly \(s\) substitutions at a given amino acid position occur over an evolutionary time \(t\) is $$ p_{s}(t)=\frac{e^{-\lambda t}(\lambda t)^{s}}{s !}, $$ where \(\lambda\) is the rate of amino acid substitution per site per unit time. Fibrinopeptides evolve rapidly: \(\lambda_{F}=9.0\) substitutions per site per \(10^{9}\) years. Lysozyme is intermediate: \(\lambda_{L} \approx 1.0\). Histones evolve slowly: \(\lambda_{H}=0.010\) substitutions per site per \(10^{9}\) years. (a) What is the probability that a fibrinopeptide has no mutations at a given site in \(t=1\) billion years? (b) What is the probability that lysozyme has three mutations per site in 100 million years? (c) We want to determine the expected number of mutations \(\langle s\rangle\) that will occur in time \(t\). We will do this in two steps. First, using the fact that probabilities must sum to one, write \(\alpha=\sum_{s=0}^{\infty}(\lambda t)^{s} / s !\) in a simpler form. (d) Now write an expression for \(\langle s\rangle\). Note that $$ \sum_{s=0}^{\infty} \frac{s(\lambda t)^{s}}{s !}=(\lambda t) \sum_{s=1}^{\infty} \frac{(\lambda t)^{s-1}}{(s-1) !}=\lambda t \alpha $$ (e) Using your answer to part (d), determine the ratio of the expected number of mutations in a fibrinopeptide to the expected number of mutations in histone protein, \(\langle s\rangle_{\mathrm{fib}} /\langle s\rangle_{\mathrm{his}}[6]\).

Combining independent probabilities. You have a fair six-sided die. You want to roll it enough times to ensure that a 2 occurs at least once. What number of rolls \(k\) is required to ensure that the probability is at least \(2 / 3\) that at least one 2 will appear?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Combined Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.