/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q9P In an experiment analogous to th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In an experiment analogous to that in Figure 28-3, the sampling constant is found to be \({K_{\rm{s}}} = 20\;{\rm{g}}.\)

(a) What mass of sample is required for a \( \pm 2\% \)sampling standard deviation?

(b) How many samples of the size in part (a) are required to produce \(90\% \)confidence that the mean is known to within\(1.5\% \)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The mass of the sample for the given standard deviation is \(5\;{\rm{g}}\).

(b) In this case we should use \(7\) samples,\(n = 4.8,8.1,6.4,7.2,6.7\)

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Standard deviation.

  • The standard deviation is a measure of how far something deviates from the mean (for example, spread, dispersion, or spread). A "typical" variation from the mean is represented by the standard deviation.
  • Because it returns to the data set's original units of measurement, it's a common measure of variability.
  • The standard deviation, defined as the square root of the variance, is a statistic that represents the dispersion of a dataset relative to its mean.
02

Determine the mass of the sample

a)

Calculate the mass of sample with the following equation

\(\begin{aligned}{}m{R^2} &= {K_S}\\m &= \frac{{{K_S}}}{{{R^2}}}\\m &= \frac{{20\;{\rm{g}}}}{{{2^2}}}\\m &= 5\;{\rm{g}}\end{aligned}\)

Hence, the mass of the sample for the given standard deviation is \(5\;{\rm{g}}\).

03

Step 3:Calculate the number of samples.

b)

Use the equation 28-7 with \({s_s} = 0.02\)and \(e = 0.015\), the initial value of \(t\) is found on the Pg.72 Table \(4 - 4\) for confidence \(90\% \) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{1.645}^2} \times {{0.02}^2}}}{{{{0.015}^2}}}\\n& = 4.8\end{aligned}\)

Next, for \(n = 5\) there are \({4^\circ }\) of freedom so \(t = 2.132\) which gives the following value of \(n\) :

\(n = \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{{2.132}^2} \times {{0.02}^2}}}{{{{0.015}^2}}}\\n &= 8.1\end{aligned}\)

Then if we use in the same equation the \({7^\circ }\) of freedom \(t = 1.895\) this would give us the following value of \(n\) :

\(\begin{aligned}{}n &= \frac{{{t^2}s_s^2}}{{{e^2}}}\\n &= \frac{{{{1.895}^2} \times {{0.02}^2}}}{{{{0.015}^2}}}\\n &= 6.4\end{aligned}\)

Then with \(t = 2.015 \to n = 7.2\) and \(t = 1.943 \to n = 6.7\)So, we would use a total of \(7\) samples.

Therefore, in this case we should use \(7\) samples,\(n = 4.8,8.1,6.4,7.2,6.7\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

From their standard reduction potentials, which of the following metals would you expect to dissolve in \({\rm{HCl}}\)by the reaction\({\rm{M}} + n{{\rm{H}}^ + } \to {{\rm{M}}^{n + }} + \frac{n}{2}{{\rm{H}}_2}:{\rm{Zn}},{\rm{Fe}},{\rm{Co}},{\rm{Al}},{\rm{Hg}},{\rm{Cu}},{\rm{Pt}}\),\({\bf{Au}}\)?

(When the potential predicts that the element will not dissolve, it probably will not. If it is expected to dissolve, it may dissolve if some other process does not interfere. Predictions based on standard reduction potentials at \({\bf{2}}{{\bf{5}}^{^{\bf{o}}}}C\) are only tentative, because the potentials and activities in hot, concentrated solutions vary widely from those in the table of standard potentials.)

Many metals in seawater can be preconcentrated for analysis by coprecipitation with\({\rm{Ga}}{({\rm{OH}})_3}\). A \(200 - \mu {\rm{L}}\)HCl solution containing \(50\mu {\rm{g}}\)of \({\rm{G}}{{\rm{a}}^{3 + }}\)is added to \(10.00\;{\rm{mL}}\) of the seawater. When the \({\rm{pH}}\)is brought to \(9.1\)with\({\rm{NaOH}}\), a jellylike precipitate forms. After centrifugation to pack the precipitate, the water is removed and the gel is washed with water. Then the gel is dissolved in \(50\mu {\rm{L}}\) of \({\rm{HN}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\)and aspirated into an inductively coupled plasma for atomic emission analysis. The preconcentration factor is\(10\;{\rm{mL}}/50\mu {\rm{L}} = 200\). The figure shows elemental concentrations in filtered and unfiltered seawater as a function of depth near hydrothermal vents.

(a) What is the atomic ratio (Ga added): (Ni in seawater) for the sample with the highest concentration of\({\rm{Ni}}\)?

(b) The results given by gray lines were obtained with seawater samples that were not filtered prior to coprecipitation. Colored lines are from filtered samples. Results for Ni do not vary between the two procedures, but results for Fe vary. Explain what this means.

EXAMPLE- Particles designated \(50/00\)mesh pass through a 50 mesh sieve bou are retained by a lo0 mesh sieve. Their size is in the range 0.150-0.300 mm.

does not pass is retained for your sample. This procedure gives particles whose diameters are in the range \(0.85 - 1.18\;{\rm{mm}}.\) We refer to the size range as \(16/20{\rm{mesh}}.\)

Suppose that much finer particles of \(80/120\)mesh size (average diameter \( = 152\mu {\rm{m}},\) average volume\( = 1.84\;{\rm{nL}}\)) were used instead. Now the mass containing \({10^4}\) particles is reduced from \(11.0to0.0388\;{\rm{g}}.\) We could analyze a larger sample to reduce the sampling uncertainty for chloride.

The county landfill in the diagram was monitored to verify that toxic compounds were not leaching into the local water supply. Wells drilled at 21 locations were monitored over a year and pollutants were observed only at sites\(8,11,12\), and 13 . Monitoring all 21 sites each month is very expensive. Suggest a strategy to use composite samples (Box 0-1) made from more than one well at a time to reduce the cost of routine monitoring. How will your scheme affect the minimum detectable level for pollutants at a particular site?

In 2002, workers at the Swedish National Food Administration discovered that heated, carbohydrate-rich foods, such as french fries, potato chips, and bread, contain alarming levels \((0.1to4\mu {\rm{g}}/{\rm{g}})\) of acrylamide, a known carcinogen\(36\).

After the discovery, simplified methods were developed to measure ppm levels of acrylamide in food. In one procedure,\(10\;{\rm{g}}\) of pulverized, frozen french fries were mixed for \(20\;{\rm{min}}\)with\(50\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}\)to extract acrylamide, which is very soluble in water \((216\;{\rm{g}}/100\;{\rm{mL}}).\)The liquid was decanted and centrifuged to remove suspended matter. The internal standard \(^2{{\rm{H}}_3}\)-acrylamide was added to\(1\;{\rm{mL}}\) of extract. A solid-phase extraction column containing \(100{\rm{mg}}\)of cation-exchange polymer with protonated sulfonic acid groups\(\left( { - {\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_3}{\rm{H}}} \right.)\) was washed twice with 1 -mL portions of methanol and twice with \(1 - {\rm{mL}}\)portions of water. The aqueous food extract \((1{\rm{mL}})\)was then passed through the column to bind protonated acrylamide \(\left( { - {\rm{NH}}_3^ + } \right)\)to sulfonate \(\left( { - {\rm{SO}}_3^ - } \right)on\)the column. The column was dried for\(30\;{\rm{s }}at\)\(0.3\)bar and then acrylamide was eluted with\(1\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \({{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}.\)Eluate was analyzed by liquid chromatography with a polar bonded phase. The chromatograms show the results moni- tored by ultraviolet absorbance or by mass spectrometry. The retention time of acrylamide is different on the two columns because they have different dimensions and different flow rates.

(a) What is the purpose of solid-phase extraction prior to chromatography? How does the ion-exchange sorbent retain acrylamide?

(b) Why are there many peaks when chromatography is monitored by ultraviolet absorbance?

(c) Mass spectral detection used selected reaction monitoring (Figure 22-33) with the \(m/z72 \to 55\)transition for acrylamide and \(75 \to 58fo{r^2}{{\rm{H}}_3}\)-acrylamide. Explain how this detection method works and suggest structures for the ions with \({\rm{m}}/{\rm{z}}72\)and 55 from acrylamide.

(d) Why does mass spectral detection give just one major peak?

(e) How is the internal standard used for quantitation with mass spectral detection?

(f) Where does \(^2{{\rm{H}}_3}\)-acrylamide appear with ultraviolet absorbance? With mass spectral selected reaction monitoring?

(g) Why does the mass spectral method give quantitative results even though retention of acrylamide by the ion-exchange sorbent is not quantitative and elution of acrylamide from the sorbent by \(1\;{\rm{mL}}\) of water might not be quantitative?

Chromatograms of acrylamide extract after passage through solid-phase extraction column. Left: Phenomenex Synergi Polar-RP 4- \(\mu {\rm{m}}\)column eluted with 96:4 \((vol/vol){{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}:{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_3}{\rm{CN}}.\)Right: Phenomenex Synergi Hydro-RP 4- \(\mu {\rm{m}}\)column eluted with \(96:4:0.1(vol/vol/vol){{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}:{\rm{C}}{{\rm{H}}_3}{\rm{OH}}:{\rm{HC}}{{\rm{O}}_2}{\rm{H}}.\) (Data from L. Peng. T. Farkas, L. Loo, \({\rm{J}}.\)Teuscher, and \({\rm{K}}.\)Kallury, "Rapid and Reproducible Extraction of Acrylamide in French Fries Using a Single Solid-Phase Sorbent," Am. Lab. News Ed, October 2003, p. 10.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.