Chapter 28: Q1TY (page 773)
If 105 particles are taken, what is the relative standard deviation of each measurement?
Short Answer
The relative standard deviation for KCl and KNO3 particles will be 3.15% and 0.032% respectively.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 28: Q1TY (page 773)
If 105 particles are taken, what is the relative standard deviation of each measurement?
The relative standard deviation for KCl and KNO3 particles will be 3.15% and 0.032% respectively.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Explain how to prepare a powder with an average particle diameter near \(100\mu m\) by using sieves from Table 28-2. How would such a particle mesh size be designated?
From their standard reduction potentials, which of the following metals would you expect to dissolve in \({\rm{HCl}}\)by the reaction\({\rm{M}} + n{{\rm{H}}^ + } \to {{\rm{M}}^{n + }} + \frac{n}{2}{{\rm{H}}_2}:{\rm{Zn}},{\rm{Fe}},{\rm{Co}},{\rm{Al}},{\rm{Hg}},{\rm{Cu}},{\rm{Pt}}\),\({\bf{Au}}\)?
(When the potential predicts that the element will not dissolve, it probably will not. If it is expected to dissolve, it may dissolve if some other process does not interfere. Predictions based on standard reduction potentials at \({\bf{2}}{{\bf{5}}^{^{\bf{o}}}}C\) are only tentative, because the potentials and activities in hot, concentrated solutions vary widely from those in the table of standard potentials.)
Why is it advantageous to use large particles \(\left( {{\bf{50}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for solid phase extraction, but small particles \(\left( {{\bf{5}}{\rm{ }}\mu {\bf{m}}} \right)\) for chromatography?
Acid-base equilibria of Cr(III) were summarized in Problem 10-36. Cr(VI) in aqueous solution above pH 6 exists as the yellow tetrahedral chromate ion, \({\rm{CrO}}_4^{2 - }.\)Between\({\rm{pH}}2\)and \(6,{\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) exists as an equilibrium mixture of\({\rm{HCrO}}_4^ - \) and orange-red dichromate,\({\rm{C}}{{\rm{r}}_2}{\rm{O}}_7^{2 - }.{\rm{Cr}}({\rm{VI}})\) is a carcinogen, but \({\rm{Cr }}(III)\)is not considered to be as harmful. The following procedure was used to measure\({\rm{Cr }}({\rm{VI}})\) in airborne particulate matter in workplaces.
1. Particles were collected by drawing a known volume of air through a polyvinyl chloride filter with \(5 - \mu {\rm{M}}\)pore size.
2. The filter was placed in a centrifuge tube and \(10\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(0.05{\rm{M}}{\left( {{\rm{N}}{{\rm{H}}_4}} \right)_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}/0.05{\rm{MN}}{{\rm{H}}_3}buffer,{\rm{pH}}8,\) were added. The immersed filter was agitated by ultrasonic vibration for\(30\;{\rm{min}}\)at \({35^\circ }{\rm{C}}\)to extract all \({\rm{Cr }}(III)and{\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) into solution.
3. A measured volume of extract was passed through a "strongly basic" anion exchanger (Table 26-1) in the \({\rm{C}}{{\rm{l}}^ - }\)form. Then the resin was washed with distilled water. Liquid containing \({\rm{Cr}}\)(III) from the extract and the wash was discarded.
4. Cr(VI) was then eluted from the column with\(0.5{\rm{M}}{\left( {{\rm{N}}{{\rm{H}}_4}} \right)_2}{\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_4}/0.05{\rm{MN}}{{\rm{H}}_3}\) buffer, \({\rm{pH}}8,\)and collected in a vial.
5. The eluted \({\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) solution was acidified with \({\rm{HCl}}\)and treated with a solution of 1,5 -diphenylcarbazide, a reagent that forms a colored complex with Cr(VI). The concentration of the complex was measured by its visible absorbance.
(a) What are the dominant species of \({\rm{Cr}}\)(VI) and \({\rm{Cr}}\)(III) at\({\rm{pH}}8\)?
(b) What is the purpose of the anion exchanger in step 3 ?
(c) Why is a "strongly basic" anion exchanger used instead of a "weakly basic" exchanger?
(d) Why is Cr(VI) eluted in step 4 but not step 3 ?
Barium titanate, a ceramic used in electronics, was analyzed by the following procedure: Into a Pt crucible was placed \(1.2\;{\rm{g}}\)of \({\rm{N}}{{\rm{a}}_2}{\rm{C}}{{\rm{O}}_3}\) and \(0.8\;{\rm{g}}\)of \({\rm{N}}{{\rm{a}}_2}\;{{\rm{B}}_4}{{\rm{O}}_7}\)plus \(0.3146\;{\rm{g}}\)of unknown. After fusion at \({1000^\circ }{\rm{C}}\)in a furnace for\(30\;{\rm{min}}\), the cooled solid was extracted with \(50\;{\rm{mL}}\)of\(6{\rm{MHCl}}\), transferred to a \(100 - {\rm{mL}}\) volumetric flask, and diluted to the mark. A \(25.00 - {\rm{mL}}\)aliquot was treated with \(5\;{\rm{mL}}\)of \(15\% \)tartaric acid (which complexes \({\rm{T}}{{\rm{i}}^{4 + }}\)and keeps it in aqueous solution) and \(25\;{\rm{mL}}\)of ammonia buffer,\({\rm{pH}}9.5\). The solution was treated with organic reagents that complex\({\rm{B}}{{\rm{a}}^{2 + }}\), and the \({\rm{Ba}}\)complex was extracted into \({\rm{CC}}{{\rm{l}}_4}.\)After acidification (to release the \({\rm{B}}{{\rm{a}}^{2 + }}\) from its organic complex), the \({\rm{B}}{{\rm{a}}^{2 + }}\)was backextracted into\(0.1{\rm{MHCl}}\). The final aqueous sample was treated with ammonia buffer and methylthymol blue (a metal ion indicator) and titrated with \(32.49\;{\rm{mL}}\) of \(0.01144{\rm{M}}\)EDTA. Find the weight per cent of Ba in the ceramic.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.