/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 The following atomic absorption ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following atomic absorption results were obtained for determinations of \(\mathrm{Zn}\) in multivitamin tablets. All absorbance values are corrected for the appropriate reagent blank \(\left(c_{\mathrm{Zn}}=0.0 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\right)\). The mean value for the blank was \(0.0000\) with a standard deviation of \(0.0047\) absorbance units. $$ \begin{array}{cc} c_{\text {Zn. }}, \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL} & A \\ \hline 5.0 & 0.0519 \\ 5.0 & 0.0463 \\ 5.0 & 0.0485 \\ 10.0 & 0.0980 \\ 10.0 & 0.1033 \\ 10.0 & 0.0925 \\ \text { Tablet sample } & 0.0672 \\ \text { Tablet sample } & 0.0614 \\ \text { Tablet sample } & 0.0661 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Find the mean absorbance values for the \(5.0\) - and \(10.0-\mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\) standards and for the tablet sample. Find the standard deviations of these values. (b) Find the least-squares best line through the points at \(c_{\mathrm{Zn}}=0.0,5.0\), and \(10.0 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\). Find the calibration sensitivity and the analytical sensitivity. (c) Find the detection limit for a \(k\) value of 3 . To what level of confidence does this correspond? (d) Find the concentration of \(\mathrm{Zn}\) in the tablet sample and the standard deviation in the concentration.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The concentrations and standard deviations for 5.0 ng/mL is 0.0489, 0.0028; for 10.0 ng/mL, 0.0979, 0.0054; Zn in tablet is 6.63 ng/mL. Calibration and analytical sensitivities are 0.00979 and 2.08. Detection limit is 1.44 ng/mL (99% confidence).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Mean and Standard Deviation for Standards and Tablet Samples

For the concentration of 5.0 ng/mL, calculate the mean absorbance by averaging the three measurements: \[ \text{Mean}_{5.0} = \frac{0.0519 + 0.0463 + 0.0485}{3} = 0.0489 \]Calculate the standard deviation using:\[ \sigma_{5.0} = \sqrt{\frac{(0.0519-0.0489)^2 + (0.0463-0.0489)^2 + (0.0485-0.0489)^2}{3-1}} = 0.0028 \]Repeat this for 10.0 ng/mL:\[ \text{Mean}_{10.0} = \frac{0.0980 + 0.1033 + 0.0925}{3} = 0.0979 \]\[ \sigma_{10.0} = \sqrt{\frac{(0.0980-0.0979)^2 + (0.1033-0.0979)^2 + (0.0925-0.0979)^2}{3-1}} = 0.0054 \]For tablet samples:\[ \text{Mean}_{\text{Tablet}} = \frac{0.0672 + 0.0614 + 0.0661}{3} = 0.0649 \]\[ \sigma_{\text{Tablet}} = \sqrt{\frac{(0.0672-0.0649)^2 + (0.0614-0.0649)^2 + (0.0661-0.0649)^2}{3-1}} = 0.0029 \]
02

Determine the Least-Squares Regression Line

Using the mean absorbance values, compute the slope \( m \) and intercept \( b \) of the least-squares line \( A = mc_{\mathrm{Zn}} + b \). This can be done using the formulae:Slope \( m \) = \( \frac{n\sum x_i y_i - \sum x_i \sum y_i}{n\sum x_i^2 - (\sum x_i)^2} \) Intercept \( b \) = \( \frac{\sum y_i \sum x_i^2 - \sum x_i \sum x_i y_i}{n\sum x_i^2 - (\sum x_i)^2} \) Where each \( x_i \) is the concentration (0.0, 5.0, 10.0) and \( y_i \) is the mean absorbance (0.0000, 0.0489, 0.0979). Calculations yield:\( m \approx 0.00979 \), \( b \approx 0.00005 \) (rounded to sig. figures).
03

Find Calibration and Analytical Sensitivity

Calibration sensitivity is equivalent to the slope of the regression line: \( S_c = m = 0.00979 \) absorbance/ng·mL.Analytical sensitivity \( S_a \) is defined as \( S_a = \frac{m}{\sigma_y} \), where \( \sigma_y \) is the standard deviation of the response (y-intercept of the regression line).Assuming the standard deviation of the blank from Step 1: \( \sigma_y = 0.0047 \)\( S_a = \frac{0.00979}{0.0047} \approx 2.08 \) ng/mL.
04

Determine Detection Limit

The detection limit (DL) is calculated using: DL = \( 3 \times \sigma_{\text{blank}} / S_c \). With \( \sigma_{\text{blank}} = 0.0047 \) and \( S_c = 0.00979 \),DL = \( \frac{3 \times 0.0047}{0.00979} \approx 1.44 \) ng/mL. This corresponds to a confidence level of approximately 99%.
05

Calculate Concentration of Zn in Tablet Samples

Use the regression equation \( A = mc_{\mathrm{Zn}} + b \) to find the concentration. Substitute each tablet's absorbance into the equation.For mean tablet absorbance \( A = 0.0649 \), solve for \( c_{\mathrm{Zn}} \):\[ 0.0649 = 0.00979 \times c_{\mathrm{Zn}} + 0.00005 \]\( c_{\mathrm{Zn}} \approx \frac{0.0649 - 0.00005}{0.00979} \approx 6.63 \) ng/mL.To find standard deviation in concentration, use propagation of error based on standard deviation of absorbance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Analytical Sensitivity
Analytical sensitivity is a crucial measure in atomic absorption spectroscopy that describes how well a method can distinguish between small differences in analyte concentrations. It is especially important in methods where precise quantification of low concentration analytes is required. This parameter is often used to compare the responsiveness of different analytical methods for trace analysis.

In simple terms, analytical sensitivity is calculated by taking the calibration sensitivity and dividing it by the standard deviation of the signal's noise. The calibration sensitivity, represented by the slope (\( S_c = m \)) of the calibration curve, indicates how much the signal changes per unit change in concentration.
  • An increase in slope signifies higher analytical sensitivity.
  • The standard deviation of the noise represents the variability in the measurement.
Thus, analytical sensitivity is given by\( S_a = \frac{m}{\sigma_y} \), where \( \sigma_y \) is the standard deviation of the response, usually influenced by the blank sample's noise.

In the provided solution, analytical sensitivity was calculated as \( S_a \approx 2.08 \) ng/mL, which means that the method can differentiate between zinc concentrations effectively due to its ability to provide distinct signal changes even for small concentration differences.
Detection Limit
The detection limit in the context of atomic absorption spectroscopy defines the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be reliably distinguished from zero. It is critical for ensuring that your method can detect trace amounts of a substance in a sample.

To calculate the detection limit, you use the formula:\( DL = \frac{k \times \sigma_{\text{blank}}}{S_c} \), where \( k \) is a multiplier that determines the level of confidence, typically set to 3 for a standard confidence level of 99%. \( \sigma_{\text{blank}} \) is the standard deviation of the blank, and \( S_c \) is the slope of the calibration line. This calculation takes into account both the signal variability and the sensitivity of the analytical method.

In this specific scenario, the detection limit was calculated as 1.44 ng/mL, indicating that concentrations below this value might not be accurately measured with confidence using this method. The value corresponds to a high confidence level, ensuring that when zinc is detected above this threshold, one can be 99% certain that it is present in the sample.
Least-Squares Regression
Least-squares regression is a statistical method used in constructing a calibration curve in atomic absorption spectroscopy. The goal is to find the best-fit line through a set of data points, minimizing the sum of the squares of the vertical deviations from each data point to the line.

For atomic absorption, this method helps in establishing a relationship between the concentration of the analyte (in this case, Zn) and the absorbance measured. The mathematical equation for the line is generally of the form \( A = mc_{\mathrm{Zn}} + b \), where:
  • \( m \) represents the slope of the line, indicating calibration sensitivity.
  • \( b \) is the y-intercept, showing background absorbance when the concentration is zero.
The calculations for slope \( m \) and intercept \( b \) involve using the summed concentrations and absorbance values to minimize error. The solution provided a least-squares line with \( m \approx 0.00979 \) and \( b \approx 0.00005 \), demonstrating a minimal background effect and reliable calibration curve.

This method is foundational in analytical chemistry, allowing analysts to predict concentrations from an absorbance measure accurately.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Water can be determined in solid samples by infrared spectroscopy. The water content of calcium sulfate hydrates is to be measured using calcium carbonate as an internal standard to compensate for some systematic errors in the procedure. A series of standard solutions containing calcium sulfate dihydrate and a constant known amount of the internal standard is prepared. The solution of unknown water content is also prepared with the same amount of internal standard. The absorbance of the dihydrate is measured at one wavelength \(\left(A_{\text {sample }}\right)\) along with that of the internal standard at another wavelength \(\left(A_{\text {std }}\right)\). The following results were obtained. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} A_{\text {sample }} & A_{\text {std }} & \% \text { water } \\ \hline 0.15 & 0.75 & 4.0 \\ 0.23 & 0.60 & 8.0 \\ 0.19 & 0.31 & 12.0 \\ 0.57 & 0.70 & 16.0 \\ 0.43 & 0.45 & 20.0 \\ 0.37 & 0.47 & \text { Unknown } \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Plot the absorbance of the sample \(\left(A_{\text {sample }}\right)\) vs. the \(\%\) water and determine whether the plot is linear from the regression statistics. (b) Plot the ratio \(A_{\text {sample }} / A_{\text {std }}\) vs. \% water, and comment on whether using the internal standard improves the linearity from that in part (a). If it improves the linearity, why? (c) Calculate \(\%\) water in the unknown using the internal standard data.

Potassium can be determined by flame emission spectrometry (flame photometry) using a lithium internal standard. The following data were obtained for standard solutions of \(\mathrm{KCl}\) and an unknown containing a constant, known amount of \(\mathrm{LiCl}\) as the internal standard. All the intensities were corrected for background by subtracting the intensity of a blank. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} c_{\mathbf{K}}, \text { Ppm } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Intensity of } \\ \text { K Emission } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Intensity of } \\ \text { Li Emission } \end{array} \\ \hline 1.0 & 10.0 & 10.0 \\ 2.0 & 15.3 & 7.5 \\ 5.0 & 34.7 & 6.8 \\ 7.5 & 65.2 & 8.5 \\ 10.0 & 95.8 & 10.0 \\ 20.0 & 110.2 & 5.8 \\ \text { Unknown } & 47.3 & 9.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Plot the K emission intensity vs. the concentration of \(\mathrm{K}\), and determine the linearity from the regression statistics. (b) Plot the ratio of the \(\mathrm{K}\) intensity to the \(\mathrm{Li}\) intensity vs. the concentration of \(K\), and compare the resulting linearity to that in part (a). Why does the internal standard improve linearity? *(c) Calculate the concentration of \(\mathrm{K}\) in the unknown.

Atomic emission measurements were made to determine sodium in a blood serum sample. The following emission intensities were obtained for standards of \(5.0\) and \(10.0 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\) and for the serum sample. All emission intensities were corrected for any blank emission. The mean value for the blank intensity \(\left(c_{\mathrm{Na}_{2}}=0.0\right)\) was \(0.000\) with a standard deviation of \(0.0071\) (arbitrary units). $$ \begin{array}{cc} c_{\mathrm{N} a}, \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL} & \text { Emission Intensity } \\ \hline 5.0 & 0.51 \\ 5.0 & 0.49 \\ 5.0 & 0.48 \\ 10.0 & 1.02 \\ 10.0 & 1.00 \\ 10.0 & 0.99 \\ \text { Serum } & 0.71 \\ \text { Serum } & 0.77 \\ \text { Serum } & 0.78 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Find the mean emission intensity values for the \(5.0\) - and \(10.0-\mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\) standards and for the serum sample. Find the standard deviations of these values. (b) Find the least squares best line through the points at \(c_{\mathrm{Na}}=0.0,5.0\), and \(10.0 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\). Find the calibration sensitivity and the analytical sensitivity. *(c) Find the detection limit for \(k\) values of 2 and 3 . To what level of confidence do these correspond? (d) Find the concentration of \(\mathrm{Na}\) in the serum sample and the standard deviation of the concentration.

The data in the table below were obtained during a colorimetric determination of glucose in blood serum. $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { Glucose concentration, mM } & \text { Absorbance, } A \\ \hline 0.0 & 0.002 \\ 2.0 & 0.150 \\ 4.0 & 0.294 \\ 6.0 & 0.434 \\ 8.0 & 0.570 \\ 10.0 & 0.704 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Assuming a linear relationship between the variables, find the least- squares estimates of the slope and intercept. (b) What are the standard deviations of the slope and intercept? What is the standard error of the estimate? (c) Determine the \(95 \%\) confidence intervals for the slope and intercept. (d) A serum sample gave an absorbance of \(0.413\). Find the \(95 \%\) confidence interval for glucose in the sample.

The sulfate ion concentration in natural water can be determined by measuring the turbidity that results when an excess of \(\mathrm{BaCl}_{2}\) is added to a measured quantity of the sample. A turbidimeter, the instrument used for this analysis, was calibrated with a series of standard \(\mathrm{Na}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) solutions. The following data were obtained in the calibration for sulfate concentrations, \(c_{\mathrm{x}}\) : $$ \begin{array}{cc} c_{s}, \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{SO}_{4}^{2-} / \mathrm{L} & \text { Turbidimeter Reading, } \mathbf{R} \\ \hline 0.00 & 0.06 \\ 5.00 & 1.48 \\ 10.00 & 2.28 \\ 15.0 & 3.98 \\ 20.0 & 4.61 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Assume that there is a linear relationship between the instrument reading and concentration. (a) Plot the data, and draw a straight line through the points by eye. (b) Compute the least-squares slope and intercept for the best straight line among the points. (c) Compare the straight line from the relationship determined in (b) with that in (a). (d) Use ANOVA to find the \(R^{2}\) value, the adjusted \(R^{2}\) value, and the significance of the regression. Comment on the interpretation of these values. (e) Compute the concentration of sulfate in a sample yielding a turbidimeter reading of \(2.84\). Find the absolute standard deviation and the coefficient of variation. (f) Repeat the calculations in (e) assuming that the 2.84 was the mean of six turbidimeter readings.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.