/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 Methanol is formed from carbon m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Methanol is formed from carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the gas-phase reaction The mole fractions of the reactive species at equilibrium satisfy the relation where \(P\) is the total pressure (atm), \(K_{c}\) the reaction equilibrium constant (atm \(^{-2}\) ), and \(T\) the temperature (K). The equilibrium constant \(K_{c}\) equals 10.5 at 373 K, and \(2.316 \times 10^{-4}\) at \(573 \mathrm{K}\). A semilog plot of \(K_{\mathrm{c}}\) (logarithmic scale) versus 1/ \(T\) (rectangular scale) is approximately linear between \(T=300 \mathrm{K}\) and \(T=600 \mathrm{K}\) (a) Derive a formula for \(K_{\mathrm{c}}(T),\) and use it to show that \(K_{\mathrm{e}}(450 \mathrm{K})=0.0548 \mathrm{atm}^{-2}\) (b) Write expressions for \(n_{A}, n_{B},\) and \(n_{C}\) (gram-moles of each species), and then \(y_{A}, y_{B},\) and \(y_{C},\) in terms of \(n_{\mathrm{A} 0}, n_{\mathrm{B} 0}, n_{\mathrm{C} 0},\) and \(\xi,\) the extent of reaction. Then derive an equation involving only \(n_{\mathrm{A} 0}, n_{\mathrm{B} 0}, n_{\mathrm{C} 0}, P, T,\) and \(\xi_{e},\) where \(\xi_{e}\) is the extent of reaction at equilibrium. (c) Suppose you begin with equimolar quantities of CO and \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) and no \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH}\), and the reaction proceeds to equilibrium at 423 K and 2.00 atm. Calculate the molar composition of the product ( \(y_{\mathrm{A}}\), \(\left.y_{\mathrm{B}}, \text { and } y_{\mathrm{C}}\right)\) and the fractional conversion of \(\mathrm{CO}\) (d) The conversion of CO and \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) can be enhanced by removing methanol from the reactor while leaving unreacted CO and \(\mathrm{H}_{2}\) in the vessel. Review the equations you derived in solving Part (c) and determine any physical constraints on \(\xi_{c}\) associated with \(n_{\mathrm{A} 0}=n_{\mathrm{B} 0}=1\) mol. Now suppose that 90\% of the methanol is removed from the reactor as it is produced; in other words, only 10\% of the methanol formed remains in the reactor. Estimate the fractional conversion of CO and the total gram moles of methanol produced in the modified operation. (e) Repeat Part (d), but now assume that \(n_{\mathrm{B} 0}=2\) mol. Explain the significant increase in fractional conversion of CO. (f) Write a set of equations for \(y_{\mathrm{A}}, y_{\mathrm{B}}, y_{\mathrm{C}},\) and \(f_{\mathrm{A}}\) (the fractional conversion of \(\mathrm{CO}\) ) in terms of \(y_{\mathrm{A} 0}, y_{\mathrm{B} 0}, T,\) and \(P(\) the reactor temperature and pressure at equilibrium). Enter the equations in an equation-solving program. Check the program by running it for the conditions of Part (c), then use it to determine the effects on \(f_{\mathrm{A}}\) (increase, decrease, or no effect) of separately increasing, (i) the fraction of \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH}\) in the feed, (ii) temperature, and (iii) pressure.

Short Answer

Expert verified
This exercise involves both the derivation of formulas for specific conditions and the illustration of how to express these conditions in algebraic and computational modelling terms. Specifically, the solutions generated provide expressions for mole quantities, mole fractions, and fractional conversions of a certain reaction. Additionally, constraints pertaining to the removal of a product from a reaction and the effects of scaling certain conditions were examined.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Derive \(K_{c}(T)\)

The equation for \(K_{c}(T)\) can be derived from the given fact that the semi-log plot of \(K_{c}\) against \(1/T\) is approximately linear. This implies that \(K_{c}\) versus \(1/T\) corresponds to the equation of a line. That is, \(lnK_c = -Ea/R(1/T) + lnA\), where \(Ea\) is the activation energy, \(R\) is the universal gas constant, and \(A\) is the pre-exponential factor. The values of \(lnA\) and \(-Ea/R\) can be found by considering two points on the line: (1/373, ln10.5) and (1/573, ln2.316x10^-4). Solving these, we finally get the equation to show that \(K_{e}(450K) = 0.0548 atm^{-2}\).
02

Step 2. Express Moles and Mole Fractions

We start with the balanced equation: \(A + B -> C\). Here, A stands for CO, B for H2 and C for CH3OH. At the beginning, there are \(n_{A0}\) moles of A, \(n_{B0}\) moles of B, and \(n_{C0}\) moles of C. When the volume of the container is not changed and \(ξ\) moles of A has reacted, \(n_{A} = n_{A0} - ξ, n_{B} = n_{B0} - ξ, n_{C} = n_{C0} + ξ\). Then the mole fractions become: \(y_{A} = n_{A}/(n_{A} + n_{B} + n_{C}), y_{B} = n_{B}/(n_{A} + n_{B} + n_{C}), y_{C} = n_{C}/(n_{A} + n_{B} + n_{C})\). We plug the expressions of \(n_{A}, n_{B}, n_{C}\) into the mole fractions and simplify. Then we substitute these into the given equation with mole fractions, retrieve the equation with \(ξ_e\) and simplify the result.
03

Step 3. Molar Composition and Fractional Conversion

Assuming dead state conditions for temperature and pressure, apply the equation derived in the previous step to calculate molar composition and the fractional conversion of CO.
04

Step 4. Constraints Review

Examine the revised equation from Step 2 and find any physical limits placed by the fact that the quantity of moles is always positive. Calculate the new fractional conversion of CO and the total moles of methanol produced when 90% of methanol is immediately removed from the reactor.
05

Step 5. Repeat for a Different Initial Molar Value

In this case, by changing \(n_{B0}\) to 2mol, calculate the resulting fractional conversion of CO. The sizable growth in fractional conversion is attributable to the bimolecular nature of the reaction.
06

Step 6. Expressing the Variables in a Set of Equations

The resulting equations in variable form will be used to draft a program and predict how fractional conversion is affected when certain variables are increased. The program is initially tested under the conditions of part (c).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Reaction Kinetics
Reaction kinetics is a branch of chemistry that deals with the rates of chemical reactions. It primarily focuses on how quickly a reaction proceeds and what factors affect this rate. For example, the activation energy, represented by \( E_a \), is a critical element in reaction kinetics. It is the energy barrier that reactants must overcome to transform into products.
Temperature also plays a significant role in reaction kinetics. Generally, as temperature increases, the reaction rate tends to increase as well. This occurs because the molecules have more kinetic energy, making it more likely for them to overcome the activation energy.
In our methanol synthesis equation, the rate of reaction is directly influenced by the concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (\( H_2 \)) as they convert into methanol (\( CH_3OH \)). The reaction rate reflects how swiftly products form from reactants in these gas-phase reactions. This rate is represented mathematically in the form of rate laws, which can be derived from the overall balanced chemical equation. By understanding reaction kinetics, we can predict how quickly equilibrium will be reached in a chemical reaction.
Moreover, in gas-phase reactions like this one, parameters such as pressure can influence both the rate and direction of the reaction. In particular, reaction kinetics can help us analyze how, at higher pressures, reactions involving gaseous components may experience increased collision frequency, potentially quickening reaction rates.
Le Chatelier's Principle
Le Chatelier's Principle is a fundamental concept in chemistry that predicts how a change in conditions affects chemical equilibrium. According to this principle, when a system at equilibrium is disturbed by a change in pressure, temperature, or concentration, the system will adjust itself to counteract the disturbance and return to a new equilibrium.
This principle is highly applicable in understanding the methanol synthesis reaction. For example:
  • Pressure: An increase in pressure, due to high molar concentrations of reactants such as CO and \( H_2 \), will shift the equilibrium position towards the formation of a smaller volume of gas—in this case, methanol.
  • Temperature: Because the reaction is exothermic (releases heat), increasing the temperature shifts the equilibrium to favor the reactants. This illustrates the sensitivity of the equilibrium to thermal changes.
By manipulating conditions such as temperature and pressure, chemists can optimize processes to favor the production of desired products. In the case of methanol production, controlling these factors can significantly increase the efficiency and yield of the reaction.
Gas-phase Reactions
Gas-phase reactions are chemical transformations that occur within gases at varied conditions of temperature and pressure. Understanding these reactions is crucial because gases act differently compared to liquids or solids, especially under changing conditions.
For the synthesis of methanol, factors such as pressure and temperature are critical. Higher pressures help to push the reaction towards product formation due to the reduced volume of gases when methanol is formed from CO and \( H_2 \). However, there's always a balance to be found, as gases can expand or compress, affecting reaction dynamics.
  • In a closed system, the total number of moles prior to the reaction will adjust itself depending on changes in pressure and volume.
  • The mole fractions of each gas component become imperative in predicting the reaction's favorability and outcome.
When examining gas-phase reactions, it’s important to consider both kinetic and equilibrium perspectives because they provide insights into how fast reactions occur and what the final composition of the system will be at equilibrium. Mathematical models and real-world applications of gas laws, like the Ideal Gas Law, combine with principles like Le Chatelier’s to predict and optimize these reactions amidst varying conditions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A drug (D) is produced in a three-stage extraction from the leaves of a tropical plant. About 1000 kg of leaf is required to produce 1 kg of the drug. The extraction solvent (S) is a mixture containing 16.5 wt\% ethanol (E) and the balance water (W). The following process is carried out to extract the drug and recover the solvent. 1\. A mixing tank is charged with \(3300 \mathrm{kg}\) of \(\mathrm{S}\) and \(620 \mathrm{kg}\) of leaf. The mixer contents are stirred for several hours, during which a portion of the drug contained in the leaf goes into solution. The contents of the mixer are then discharged through a filter. The liquid filtrate, which carries over roughly \(1 \%\) of the leaf fed to the mixer, is pumped to a holding tank, and the solid cake (spent leaf and entrained liquid) is sent to a second mixer. The entrained liquid has the same composition as the filtrate and a mass equal to \(15 \%\) of the mass of liquid charged to the mixer. The extracted drug has a negligible effect on the total mass and volume of the spent leaf and the filtrate. 2\. The second mixer is charged with the spent leaf from the first mixer and with the filtrate from the previous batch in the third mixer. The leaf is extracted for several more hours, and the contents of the mixer are then discharged to a second filter. The filtrate, which contains \(1 \%\) of the leaf fed to the second mixer, is pumped to the same holding tank that received the filtrate from the first mixer, and the solid cake- -spent leaf and entrained liquid - is sent to the third mixer. The entrained liquid mass is \(15 \%\) of the mass of liquid charged to the second mixer. 3\. The third mixer is charged with the spent leaf from the second mixer and with \(2720 \mathrm{kg}\) of solvent \(\mathrm{S}\). The mixer contents are filtered; the filtrate, which contains \(1 \%\) of the leaf fed to the third mixer, is recycled to the second mixer; and the solid cake is discarded. As before, the mass of the entrained liquid in the solid cake is \(15 \%\) of the mass of liquid charged to the mixer. 4\. The contents of the filtrate holding tank are filtered to remove the carried-over spent leaf, and the wet cake is pressed to recover entrained liquid, which is combined with the filtrate. A negligible amount of liquid remains in the wet cake. The filtrate, which contains \(\mathrm{D}, \mathrm{E},\) and \(\mathrm{W},\) is pumped to an extraction unit (another mixer). 5\. In the extraction unit, the alcohol-water-drug solution is contacted with another solvent (F), which is almost but not completely immiscible with ethanol and water. Essentially all of the drug (D) is extracted into the second solvent, from which it is eventually separated by a process of no concern in this problem. Some ethanol but no water is also contained in the extract. The solution from which the drug has been extracted (the raffinate) contains \(13.0 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{E}, 1.5 \% \mathrm{F},\) and \(85.5 \%\) W. It is fed to a stripping column for recovery of the ethanol. 6\. The feeds to the stripping column are the solution just described and steam. The two streams are fed in a ratio such that the overhead product stream from the column contains \(20.0 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{E}\) and \(2.6 \% \mathrm{F},\) and the bottom product stream contains \(1.3 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{E}\) and the balance \(\mathrm{W}\). Draw and label a flowchart of the process, taking as a basis one batch of leaf processed. Then calculate (a) the masses of the components of the filtrate holding tank. (b) the masses of the components \(D\) and \(E\) in the extract stream leaving the extraction unit. (c) the mass of steam fed to the stripping column, and the masses of the column overhead and bottoms products.

Two aqueous sulfuric acid solutions containing \(20.0 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}(\mathrm{SG}=1.139)\) and \(60.0 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) (SG = 1.498) are mixed to form a 4.00 molar solution (SG = 1.213). (a) Calculate the mass fraction of sulfuric acid in the product solution. (b) Taking \(100 \mathrm{kg}\) of the \(20 \%\) feed solution as a basis, draw and label a flowchart of this process, labeling both masses and volumes, and do the degree-of-freedom analysis. Calculate the feed ratio (liters 20\% solution/liter 60\% solution). (c) What feed rate of the \(60 \%\) solution (L/h) would be required to produce \(1250 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{h}\) of the product?

The popularity of orange juice, especially as a breakfast drink, makes this beverage an important factor in the economy of orange-growing regions. Most marketed juice is concentrated and frozen and then reconstituted before consumption, and some is "not-from-concentrate." Although concentrated juices are less popular in the United States than they were at one time, they still have a major segment of the market for orange juice. The approaches to concentrating orange juice include evaporation, freeze concentration, and reverse osmosis. Here we examine the evaporation process by focusing only on two constituents in the juice: solids and water. Fresh orange juice contains approximately 10 wt\% solids (sugar, citric acid, and other ingredients) and frozen concentrate contains approximately 42 wt\% solids. The frozen concentrate is obtained by evaporating water from the fresh juice to produce a mixture that is approximately 65 wt\% solids. However, so that the flavor of the concentrate will closely approximate that of fresh juice, the concentrate from the evaporator is blended with fresh orange juice (and other additives) to produce a final concentrate that is approximately 42 wt\% solids. (a) Draw and label a flowchart of this process, neglecting the vaporization of everything in the juice but water. First prove that the subsystem containing the point where the bypass stream splits off from the evaporator feed has one degree of freedom. (If you think it has zero degrees, try determining the unknown variables associated with this system.) Then perform the degree- offreedom analysis for the overall system, the evaporator, and the bypass- evaporator product mixing point, and write in order the equations you would solve to determine all unknown stream variables. In each equation, circle the variable for which you would solve, but don't do any calculations. (b) Calculate the amount of product (42\% concentrate) produced per 100 kg fresh juice fed to the process and the fraction of the feed that bypasses the evaporator. (c) Most of the volatile ingredients that provide the taste of the concentrate are contained in the fresh juice that bypasses the evaporator. You could get more of these ingredients in the final product by evaporating to (say) 90\% solids instead of 65\%; you could then bypass a greater fraction of the fresh juice and thereby obtain an even better tasting product. Suggest possible drawbacks to this proposal.

Methanol is synthesized from carbon monoxide and hydrogen in a catalytic reactor. The fresh feed to the process contains 32.0 mole \(\%\) CO, \(64.0 \%\) H \(_{2}\), and \(4.0 \%\) Ne. This stream is mixed with a recycle stream in a ratio 5 mol recycle/ 1 mol fresh feed to produce the feed to the reactor, which contains 13.0 mole\% \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\). A low single-pass conversion is attained in the reactor. The reactor effluent goes to a condenser from which two streams emerge: a liquid product stream containing essentially all the methanol formed in the reactor, and a gas stream containing all the \(\mathrm{CO}, \mathrm{H}_{2}\), and \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\) leaving the reactor. The gas stream is split into two fractions: one is removed from the process as a purge stream, and the other is the recycle stream that combines with the fresh feed to the reactor. (a) Assume a methanol production rate of \(100 \mathrm{kmol} / \mathrm{h}\). Perform the DOF for the overall system and all subsystems to prove that there is insufficient information to solve for all unknowns. (b) Briefly explain in your own words the reasons for including (i) the recycle stream and (ii) the purge stream in the process design.

A \(100 \mathrm{kmol} / \mathrm{h}\) stream that is 97 mole \(\%\) carbon tetrachloride \(\left(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\right)\) and \(3 \%\) carbon disulfide \(\left(\mathrm{CS}_{2}\right)\) is to be recovered from the bottom of a distillation column. The feed to the column is 16 mole \(\% \mathrm{CS}_{2}\) and \(84 \% \mathrm{CCl}_{4},\) and \(2 \%\) of the \(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\) entering the column is contained in the overhead stream leaving the top of the column. (a) Draw and label a flowchart of the process and do the degree-of-freedom analysis. (b) Calculate the mass and mole fractions of \(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\) in the overhead stream, and determine the molar flow rates of \(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\) and \(\mathrm{CS}_{2}\) in the overhead and feed streams. (c) Suppose the overhead stream is analyzed and the mole fraction of \(\mathrm{CS}_{2}\) is found to be significantly lower than the value calculated in Part (b). List as many reasons as you can for the discrepancy, including possible violations of assumptions made in Part (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.