/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 Ammonia is oxidized to nitric ox... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Ammonia is oxidized to nitric oxide in the following reaction: $$4 \mathrm{NH}_{3}+5 \mathrm{O}_{2} \rightarrow 4 \mathrm{NO}+6 \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}$$ (a) Calculate the ratio (lb-mole \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) react/lb-mole NO formed). (b) If ammonia is fed to a continuous reactor at a rate of \(100.0 \mathrm{kmol} \mathrm{NH}_{3} / \mathrm{h}\), what oxygen feed rate (kmol/h) would correspond to 40.0\% excess O_? (c) If \(50.0 \mathrm{kg}\) of ammonia and \(100.0 \mathrm{kg}\) of oxygen are fed to a batch reactor, determine the limiting reactant, the percentage by which the other reactant is in excess, and the extent of reaction and mass of NO produced (kg) if the reaction proceeds to completion.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The ratio is 1.25 lb-mole \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) react per lb-mole NO formed. (b) The \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) feed rate would be 175 kmol/h. (c) The limiting reactant is \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\), \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) is in excess by 17.64%, and the extent of reaction allows for the production of 75 kg of \(\mathrm{NO}\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the molar ratio

From the balanced equation, the ratio \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) to \(\mathrm{NO}\) is \(\frac{5 \mathrm{O}_{2}}{4\mathrm{NO}}\). This simplifies to a ratio of \(\frac{5}{4}\) or 1.25.
02

Calculating the oxygen feed rate

The \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\)'s feed rate is 100.0 kmol per hour with an excess of 40% \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\). The stoichiometric feed rate of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) is 1.25 times the feed rate of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) (from Step 1) or \(1.25 \times100 = 125\) kmol/h. With a 40\% excess, the \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\)'s feed rate is \(125 + (0.40 \times 125) = 175\) kmol/h.
03

Determining the limiting reactant

If 50.0 kg of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) and 100.0 kg of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) are fed into the reactor, we need to convert the masses to moles. Using the molar masses (\(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\)'s is approximately 17 g/mol and \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\)'s is approximately 32 g/mol), we get \(2941\) moles of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) and \(3125\) moles of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\). The molar ratio of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}:NH_{3}\) from the reaction is \(5:4\). So for every 4 moles of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\), we need 5 moles of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\). So the amount of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) needed is \(5/4 \times 2941=3676\) moles. As we have only \(3125\) moles of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) present, \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) is the limiting reactant.
04

Calculating the Excess Reactant

Having figured out that \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) is the limiting reactant, we need to discern how much \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) is in excess. From the equation, we know that for every 5 moles of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\), 4 moles of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) are required. So the number of moles of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) needed is \(4/5 \times 3125=2500\) moles. Hence, \(2941-2500 = 441\) moles of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) are in excess. The percentage by which \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) is in excess is then \((441/2500) \times 100\%\), or \(17.64\%.\)
05

Calculating the Extent of reaction and Mass of NO produced

The limiting reactant dictates the reaction's extent. Given that \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) is the limiting reactant, the reaction can't go beyond \(3125\) moles. To calculate the mass of \(\mathrm{NO}\) produced, we can use the balanced equation, which tells us that 4 moles of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) yield 4 moles of \(\mathrm{NO}\) - which yields a 1:1 ratio. Therefore, \(2500\) moles of \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) (the amount that reacted) yield \(2500\) moles of \(\mathrm{NO}\). To convert this to mass, multiply by \(\mathrm{NO}\)'s molar mass (\(30\) g/mol), yielding \(2500 * 30 = 75000\) g or \(75\) kg of \(\mathrm{NO}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Limiting Reactant
Understanding the concept of a limiting reactant is crucial in chemical reactions, as it determines how much product can be formed. A limiting reactant is the reactant that is completely consumed first in a chemical reaction, thus limiting the amount of product that can be produced. It's analogous to running out of gas on a road trip; no matter how much of the other reactants (or snacks) you have left, the trip can't continue without gas.

Determining the limiting reactant involves comparing the molar amount of all reactants based on the reaction's stoichiometry. In the given problem where ammonia (\(NH_{3}\)) is oxidized to nitric oxide (\(NO\) ), if we start with 50.0 kg of \(NH_{3}\) and 100.0 kg of \(O_{2}\), we first convert the mass of the reactants to moles. Once we have the moles, we can use the balanced chemical equation to find out the ideal ratio between \(NH_{3}\) and \(O_{2}\) to react completely without any remainder. In this case, \(O_{2}\) runs out before \(NH_{3}\), making \(O_{2}\) the limiting reactant.

When teaching this concept, it can be helpful to visually illustrate the process using diagrams that show mole comparisons, ensuring students understand that it's not necessarily about the 'amount' of a substance, but about the ratio in which it reacts based on the balanced chemical equation.
Excess Reactant
In contrast to the limiting reactant, we have an excess reactant, which is the substance that remains after the reaction has gone to completion because there was more of it than necessary according to the stoichiometric ratios. Once the limiting reactant is entirely used up, the reaction stops, and it's not possible to use the remaining excess reactant without adding more of the limiting one.

In our exercise, after determining that \(O_{2}\) is the limiting reactant, we calculate the amount of the excess reactant, \(NH_{3}\), which was not consumed during the reaction. This is important for two reasons: it can be recovered and used elsewhere, and it informs adjustments for future reactions to minimize waste and costs. By calculating the exact excess percentage of \(NH_{3}\), we provide valuable information for optimizing the reaction's efficiency in practical applications.

Students might benefit from practical examples or experiments that demonstrate how excess reactants can be quantified in a lab setting and discussing why this could be economically and environmentally significant.
Molar Ratio
The molar ratio is a foundational concept in stoichiometry that expresses the proportions of reactants and products in a balanced chemical reaction. It is derived from the coefficients of each substance in the balanced equation and informs us exactly how much of one reactant is needed to react with another. This is the stoichiometric 'recipe' for the reaction to occur perfectly without any leftover reactants.

For the exercise presented, the molar ratio of \(O_{2}\) to \(NO\) from the balanced equation is 1.25, indicating 1.25 moles of oxygen are required for every mole of nitric oxide produced. When working with a continuous reactor scenario, as in question (b), understanding molar ratios allows us to predict the amount of one reactant (oxygen) needed when we're given the flow rate of another (ammonia), including accounting for excess to ensure complete reaction.

When teaching molar ratios, it is effective to engage students in mole-to-mole conversion practice and help them visualize the concept with pie charts or other graphical representations that show the proportion of reactants to products. This aids them in developing an instinctive understanding of the quantities involved in reactions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The gas-phase reaction between methanol and acetic acid to form methyl acetate and water takes place in a batch reactor. When the reaction mixture comes to equilibrium, the mole fractions of the four reactive species are related by the reaction equilibrium constant $$K_{y}=\frac{y_{C} y_{D}}{y_{A} y_{B}}=4.87$$ (a) Suppose the feed to the reactor consists of \(n_{\mathrm{A} 0}, n_{\mathrm{B} 0}, n_{\mathrm{C} 0}, n_{\mathrm{D} 0},\) and \(n_{10}\) gram-moles of \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{C}, \mathrm{D},\) and an inert gas, I, respectively. Let \(\xi\) be the extent of reaction. Write expressions for the gram-moles of each reactive species in the final product, \(n_{\mathrm{A}}(\xi), n_{\mathrm{B}}(\xi), n_{\mathrm{C}}(\xi),\) and \(n_{\mathrm{D}}(\xi) .\) Then use these expressions and the given equilibrium constant to derive an equation for \(\xi_{c}\), the equilibrium extent of reaction, in terms of \(\left.n_{\mathrm{A} 0}, \ldots, n_{10} . \text { (see Example } 4.6-2 .\right)\) (b) If the feed to the reactor contains equimolar quantities of methanol and acetic acid and no other species, calculate the equilibrium fractional conversion. (c) It is desired to produce 70 mol of methyl acetate starting with 75 mol of methanol. If the reaction proceeds to equilibrium, how much acetic acid must be fed? What is the composition of the final product? (d) Suppose it is important to reduce the concentration of methanol by making its conversion at equilibrium as high as possible, say 99\%. Again assuming the feed to the reactor contains only methanol and acetic acid and that it is desired to produce 70 mol of methyl acetate, determine the extent of reaction and quantities of methanol and acetic acid that must be fed to the reactor. (e) If you wanted to carry out the process of Part (b) or (c) commercially, what would you need to know besides the equilibrium composition to determine whether the process would be profitable? (List several things.)

Chlorobenzene \(\left(\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{Cl}\right),\) an important solvent and intermediate in the production of many other chemicals, is produced by bubbling chlorine gas through liquid benzene in the presence of ferric chloride catalyst. In an undesired side reaction, the product is further chlorinated to dichlorobenzene, and in a third reaction the dichlorobenzene is chlorinated to trichlorobenzene. The feed to a chlorination reactor consists of essentially pure benzene and a technical grade of chlorine gas (98 wt\% \(\mathrm{Cl}_{2}\), the balance gaseous impurities with an average molecular weight of 25.0 ). The liquid output from the reactor contains \(65.0 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{6}, 32.0 \% \mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{Cl}, 2.5 \% \mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2},\) and \(0.5 \%\) \(\mathrm{C}_{6} \mathrm{H}_{3} \mathrm{Cl}_{3} .\) The gaseous output contains only \(\mathrm{HCl}\) and the impurities that entered with the chlorine. (a) You wish to determine (i) the percentage by which benzene is fed in excess, (ii) the fractional conversion of benzene, (iii) the fractional yield of monochlorobenzene, and (iv) the mass ratio of the gas feed to the liquid feed. Without doing any calculations, prove that you have enough information about the process to determine these quantities. (b) Perform the calculations. (c) Why would benzene be fed in excess and the fractional conversion kept low? (d) What might be done with the gaseous effluent? (e) It is possible to use 99.9\% pure ("reagent-grade") chlorine instead of the technical grade actually used in the process. Why is this probably not done? Under what conditions might extremely pure reactants be called for in a commercial process? (Hint: Think about possible problems associated with the impurities in technical grade chemicals.)

A fuel oil is analyzed and found to contain 85.0 wt\% carbon, \(12.0 \%\) elemental hydrogen (H), \(1.7 \%\) sulfur, and the remainder noncombustible matter. The oil is burned with \(20.0 \%\) excess air, based on complete combustion of the carbon to \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\), the hydrogen to \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\), and the sulfur to \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\). The oil is burned completely, but \(8 \%\) of the carbon forms CO. Calculate the molar composition of the stack gas.

A sedimentation process is to be used to separate pulverized coal from slate. A suspension of finely divided particles of galena (lead sulfide, SG = 7.44) in water is prepared. The overall specific gravity of the suspension is 1.48. (a) Four hundred kilograms of galena and a quantity of water are loaded into a tank and stirred to obtain a uniform suspension with the required specific gravity. Draw and label the flowchart (label both the masses and volumes of the galena and water), do the degree-of-freedom analysis, and calculate how much water ( \(\mathrm{m}^{3}\) ) must be fed to the tank. (b) A mixture of coal and slate is placed in the suspension. The coal rises to the top and is skimmed off, and the slate sinks. What can you conclude about the specific gravities of coal and slate? (c) The separation process works well for several hours, but then a region of clear liquid begins to form at the top of the cloudy suspension and the coal sinks to the bottom of this region, making skimming more difficult. What might be happening to cause this behavior and what corrective action might be taken? Now what can you say about the specific gravity of coal?

In the Deacon process for the manufacture of chlorine, HCI and \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) react to form \(\mathrm{Cl}_{2}\) and \(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\) Sufficient air ( 21 mole \(\% \mathrm{O}_{2}, 79 \% \mathrm{N}_{2}\) ) is fed to provide \(35 \%\) excess oxygen, and the fractional conversion of HCl is \(85 \%\) (a) Calculate the mole fractions of the product stream components, using atomic species balances in your calculation. (b) Again calculate the mole fractions of the product stream components, only this time use the extent of reaction in the calculation. (c) An alternative to using air as the oxygen source would be to feed pure oxygen to the reactor. Running with oxygen imposes a significant extra process cost relative to running with air, but also offers the potential for considerable savings. Speculate on what the cost and savings might be. What would determine which way the process should be run?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.