/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 Questions 32-36 refer to the fol... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Questions 32-36 refer to the following. Two half-cells are set up as follows: Half-Cell A: Strip of \(\mathrm{Cu}(s)\) in \(\mathrm{CuNO}_{3}(a q)\) Half-Cell B: Strip of \(\mathrm{Zn}(s)\) in \(\mathrm{Zn}\left(\mathrm{NO}_{3}\right)_{2}\) (aq) When the cells are connected according to the diagram below, the following reaction occurs: GRAPH CAN'T COPY $$2 \mathrm{Cu}^{+}(a q)+\mathrm{Zn}(s) \rightarrow 2 \mathrm{Cu}(s)+\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}(a q) E^{\circ}=+1.28 \mathrm{V}$$ If the \(\mathrm{Cu}^{+}+e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Cu}(s)\) half-reaction has a standard reduction potential of \(+0.52 \mathrm{V},\) what is the standard reduction potential for the \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}+2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Zn}(s)\) half-reaction? (A) \(+0.76 \mathrm{V}\) (B) \(-0.76 \mathrm{V}\) (C) \(+0.24 \mathrm{V}\) (D) \(-0.24 \mathrm{V}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The standard reduction potential for the \(Zn^{2+}+2e^{-}\rightarrow Zn(s)\) half-reaction is \(-0.76V\). So, the answer is (B) \(-0.76V\).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the half-reactions

The two half-reactions are: \(Cu^{+}+e^{-}\rightarrow Cu(s)\) and \(Zn^{2+}+2e^{-}\rightarrow Zn(s)\). In the provided overall reaction, Copper is getting reduced (gains electrons) and Zinc is getting oxidized (loses electrons). This corresponds to the half-reactions except Zinc is undergoing oxidation, not reduction. Therefore, when calculating the potential, we need to be aware of the change.
02

Write down the known reduction potentials

We know that the standard reduction potential of the \(Cu^{+}+e^{-}\rightarrow Cu(s)\) reaction is \(+0.52V\). And the overall cell potential given is \(+1.28V\).
03

Calculate the standard reduction potential for the Zn half-reaction

The standard cell potential is the sum of the standard reduction potentials of the two half-reactions when the reactions are added together. The reduction potential of the Zinc reaction is the unknown we need to find. We use the equation: \(E_{cell} = E_{red, Cu} + E_{red, Zn}\). Substituting the known values: \(1.28V = 0.52V + E_{red, Zn}\). Solving for \(E_{red, Zn}\), we find \(E_{red, Zn} = 1.28V - 0.52V = 0.76V\). However, this is the value if Zinc was being reduced. In the overall reaction, it is being oxidised. Therefore, the reduction potential of the Zinc reaction is \(-0.76V\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standard reduction potential
Standard reduction potential is a measure of the tendency of a chemical species to acquire electrons and thereby be reduced. It is expressed in volts and usually measured under standard conditions, which are 25°C, 1 M concentration for solutions, and 1 atm pressure for gases.

In electrochemistry, a more positive standard reduction potential indicates a greater likelihood of the species accepting electrons and undergoing reduction. Conversely, a more negative potential suggests a species is less likely to be reduced.
  • These potentials are listed in tables as reference points, making it easier to predict the direction of electron flow in electrochemical cells.
  • They enable calculations like finding the cell potential, which is crucial for assessing the feasibility and spontaneity of a reaction.
Understanding standard reduction potentials helps predict the reactions that occur in voltaic cells, crucial for harnessing energy in batteries.
Half-cell reactions
Half-cell reactions represent one part of the two-part process in an electrochemical cell. Each half-cell involves a redox reaction: one for oxidation and one for reduction.

Consider the two half-cells from the example:
  • Half-Cell A: Copper undergoes reduction: \(Cu^+ + e^- \rightarrow Cu(s) \)
  • Half-Cell B: Zinc undergoes oxidation: \(Zn(s) \rightarrow Zn^{2+} + 2e^- \)
By writing these reactions separately, we can clearly see the electron exchange, making it easier to calculate the overall cell potential. In this context, the terms "oxidation" and "reduction" refer to the processes of losing and gaining electrons, respectively.

Each half-cell reaction is based on the respective reduction or oxidation potential provided in standard tables, making it critical for accurate cell design and calculations.
Voltage calculation
Calculating the voltage of an electrochemical cell involves adding the reduction potentials of each half-reaction. The overall cell potential \(E_{cell}\) is given by:
\[ E_{cell} = E_{red, \, cathode} + E_{red, \, anode} \]

In the case of the example, we want to find the contribution of the zinc half-reaction when copper's potential is known. The process is straightforward:
  • Start with the known cell potential: \(1.28 \text{ V}\).
  • The copper reduction potential is given as \(+0.52 \text{ V}\).
  • We can rearrange terms to solve for zinc: \(E_{red, \, Zn} = 1.28 \text{ V} - 0.52 \text{ V} = 0.76 \text{ V}\).
This calculated \(0.76\text{ V}\) is for reduction. Since zinc is oxidized in the actual process, we flip the sign, resulting in a zinc reduction potential of \(-0.76\text{ V}\), demonstrating how the voltage reflects the electron flow direction.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\(\begin{array}{ll}{\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}+2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Cu}} & {E^{\circ}=+0.3 \mathrm{V}} \\ {\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}+2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Zn}} & {E^{\circ}=-0.8 \mathrm{V}} \\ {\mathrm{Mn}^{2+}+2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Mn}} & {E^{\circ}=-1.2 \mathrm{V}}\end{array}\) Based on the reduction potentials given above, which of the following reactions will be favored? (A) \(\mathrm{Mn}^{2+}+\mathrm{Cu} \rightarrow \mathrm{Mn}+\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) (B) \(\mathrm{Mn}^{2+}+\mathrm{Zn} \rightarrow \mathrm{Mn}+\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}\) (C) \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}+\mathrm{Cu} \rightarrow \mathrm{Zn}+\mathrm{Cu}^{2+}\) (D) \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}+\mathrm{Mn} \rightarrow \mathrm{Zn}+\mathrm{Mn}^{2+}\)

A student titrates 20.0 \(\mathrm{mL}\) of 1.0 \(M \mathrm{NaOH}\) with 2.0 \(\mathrm{M}\), \(\mathrm{HCO}_{2} \mathrm{H}\left(K_{\mathrm{a}}=1.8 \times 10^{-4}\right) .\) Formic acid is a monoprotic acid. If the formic acid were replaced with a strong acid such as HCl at the same concentration (2.0 M), how would that change the volume needed to reach the equivalence point? (A) The change would reduce the amount as the acid now fully dissociates. (B) The change would reduce the amount because the base will be more strongly attracted to the acid. (C) The change would increase the amount because the reaction will now go to completion instead of equilibrium. (D) Changing the strength of the acid will not change the volume needed to reach equivalence.

The following reaction is found to be at equilibrium at 25°C: \(2 \mathrm{SO}_{3}(g) \leftrightarrow \mathrm{O}_{2}(g)+2 \mathrm{SO}_{2}(g) \quad \Delta H=-198 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\) Which of the following would cause a reduction in the value for the equilibrium constant? (A) Increasing the amount of \(\mathrm{SO}_{3}\) (B) Reducing the amount of \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) (C) Raising the temperature (D) Lowering the temperature

The following reaction is found to be at equilibrium at 25°C: \(2 \mathrm{SO}_{3}(g) \leftrightarrow \mathrm{O}_{2}(g)+2 \mathrm{SO}_{2}(g) \quad \Delta H=-198 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{mol}\) What is the expression for the equilibrium constant, \(K_{\mathrm{c}} ?\) (A) \(\frac{\left[\mathrm{SO}_{3}\right]^{2}}{\left[\mathrm{O}_{2}\right]\left[\mathrm{SO}_{2}\right]^{2}}\) (B) \(\frac{2\left[\mathrm{SO}_{3}\right]}{\left[\mathrm{O}_{2}\right] 2\left[\mathrm{SO}_{2}\right]}\) (C) \(\frac{\left[\mathrm{O}_{2}\right]\left[\mathrm{SO}_{2}\right]^{2}}{\left[\mathrm{SO}_{3}\right]^{2}}\) (D) \(\frac{\left[\mathrm{O}_{2}\right] 2\left[\mathrm{SO}_{2}\right]}{2\left[\mathrm{SO}_{3}\right]}\)

Use the following information to answer questions 29-31. Pennies are made primarily of zinc, which is coated with a thin layer of copper through electroplating, using a setup like the one above. The solution in the beaker is a strong acid (which produces H' ions), and the cell is wired so that the copper electrode is the anode and zinc penny is the cathode. Use the following reduction potentials to answer questions \(29-31 .\) $$\begin{array}{|l|l|}\hline \text { Half-Reaction } & {\text { Standard Reduction Potential }} \\ \hline \mathrm{Cu}^{2++2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Cu}(s)} & {+0.34 \mathrm{V}} \\ \hline 2 \mathrm{H}^{++2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{H}_{2}(g)} & {0.00 \mathrm{V}} \\ \hline \mathrm{Ni}^{2++2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Ni}(s)} & {-0.25 \mathrm{V}} \\\ \hline \mathrm{Zn}^{2++2 e^{-} \rightarrow \mathrm{Zn}(s)} & {-0.76 \mathrm{V}} \\ \hline\end{array}$$ If, instead of copper, a nickel bar were to be used, could nickel be plated onto the zinc penny effectively? Why or why not? (A) Yes, nickel’s SRP is greater than that of zinc, which is all that is required for nickel to be reduced at the cathode (B) Yes, nickel is able to take electrons from the \(\mathrm{H}^{+}\) ions in solution, allowing it to be reduced (C) No, nickel's SRP is lower than that of \(\mathrm{H}^{+}\) ions, which means the only product being produced at the cathode would be hydrogen gas (D) No, nickel's SRP is negative, meaning it cannot be reduced in an electrolytic cell

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.