/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Covalent bonding occurs in both ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Covalent bonding occurs in both molecular and covalentnetwork solids. Which of the following statements best explains why these two kinds of solids differ so greatly in their hardness and melting points? (a) The molecules in molecular solids have stronger covalent bonding than covalent-network solids do. (b) The molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular interactions. (c) The atoms in covalent-network solids are more polarizable than those in molecular solids. (d) Molecular solids are denser than covalent-network solids.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The best explanation for the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids is that the molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular interactions (Statement b).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Molecular and Covalent-Network Solids

Molecular solids are formed by molecules held together by weak intermolecular forces like van der Waals forces or hydrogen bonding. Covalent-network solids, on the other hand, are formed by atoms connected through strong covalent bonds throughout the whole network.
02

Analyzing the Statements

(a) Covalent bonds are stronger than intermolecular forces; therefore, this statement is incorrect as it suggests that molecular solids have stronger bonding than covalent-network solids. (b) This statement suggests that the molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular forces. This statement is correct, as molecular solids are held together by weak forces like van der Waals forces or hydrogen bonds. (c) Polarizability refers to the ease with which an atom's electron cloud can be distorted. This statement is not relevant to the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids. Additionally, polarizability is not an overarching factor which distinguishes these two types of solids. (d) Density is a measure of mass per unit volume. This statement is also not relevant to the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids. Density may differ between individual substances, but there is no general trend that supports this statement.
03

Choosing the Best Explanation

Based on our analysis, the best explanation for the difference in hardness and melting points between molecular and covalent-network solids is statement (b): The molecules in molecular solids are held together by weak intermolecular interactions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Indicate the type of solid (molecular, metallic, ionic, or covalent-network) for each compound: (a) InAs, (b) \(\mathrm{MgO}\), (c) \(\mathrm{HgS}\), (d) In, (e) HBr.

When you shine light of band gap energy or higher on a semiconductor and promote electrons from the valence band to the conduction band, do you expect the conductivity of the semiconductor to (a) remain unchanged, (b) increase, or (c) decrease?

Which of these statements about alloys and intermetallic compounds is false? (a) Bronze is an example of an alloy. (b) "Alloy" is just another word for "a chemical compound of fixed composition that is made of two or more metals." (c) Intermetallics are compounds of two or more metals that have a definite composition and are not considered alloys. (d) If you mix two metals together and, at the atomic level, they separate into two or more different compositional phases, you have created a heterogeneous alloy. (e) Alloys can be formed even if the atoms that comprise them are rather different in size.

A particular form of cinnabar (HgS) adopts the zinc blende structure. The length of the unit cell edge is \(5.852 \AA\). (a) Calculate the density of \(\mathrm{HgS}\) in this form. (b) The mineral tiemmanite ( \(\mathrm{HgSe}\) ) also forms a solid phase with the zinc blende structure. The length of the unit cell edge in this mineral is \(6.085 \AA\). What accounts for the larger unit cell length in tiemmanite? (c) Which of the two substances has the higher density? How do you account for the difference in densities?

A white substance melts with some decomposition at \(730^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). As a solid, it does not conduct electricity, but it dissolves in water to form a conducting solution. Which type of solid (molecular, metallic, covalent- network, or ionic) might the substance be?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.