/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 54 On the atomic level, what distin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

On the atomic level, what distinguishes an antiferromagnetic material from a diamagnetic one?

Short Answer

Expert verified
On the atomic level, the key difference between antiferromagnetic and diamagnetic materials lies in their electronic structures. Antiferromagnetic materials have unpaired electrons, resulting in magnetic moments that align in opposite directions due to strong exchange interaction, leading to a net magnetization of zero. In contrast, diamagnetic materials have all electrons paired, resulting in no magnetic moments, and thus no net magnetization. They also create an induced magnetic field opposite to any applied external magnetic field.

Step by step solution

01

Define Antiferromagnetic Materials

Antiferromagnetic materials are materials in which the magnetic moments of atoms or molecules, usually due to the presence of unpaired electrons, are aligned in opposite directions, resulting in a net magnetization of zero. This opposite alignment is typically due to a strong exchange interaction between the neighboring atoms or ions.
02

Define Diamagnetic Materials

Diamagnetic materials are materials that do not have any net magnetic moment. The atoms or molecules in these materials have all their electrons paired, meaning there are no unpaired electrons to contribute to a magnetic moment. This absence of unpaired electrons results in a zero net magnetic moment. When an external magnetic field is applied, these materials create an induced magnetic field opposite to the applied field, which results in the material being repelled by the external field.
03

Compare Electronic Structures

The main difference between antiferromagnetic and diamagnetic materials lies in their electronic structures. In antiferromagnetic materials, there are unpaired electrons in the atoms which can create a net magnetic moment. The neighboring atoms, due to the exchange interaction, align these magnetic moments in opposite directions, causing the overall net magnetization to be zero. On the other hand, diamagnetic materials have all electrons in their atomic structure paired, so there are no unpaired electrons to create a magnetic moment. As a result, the net magnetic moment of these materials is always zero, without the need for any specific exchange interaction.
04

Summarize the Key Differences

To sum up, the key differences between antiferromagnetic and diamagnetic materials at the atomic level are: 1. Antiferromagnetic materials have unpaired electrons leading to magnetic moments that align in opposite directions due to strong exchange interaction, resulting in a net magnetization of zero. 2. Diamagnetic materials have all electrons paired, resulting in no magnetic moments, and thus no net magnetization. They also create an induced magnetic field opposite to any applied external magnetic field. In conclusion, the difference between antiferromagnetic and diamagnetic materials on the atomic level lies in their electronic structures and the presence or absence of unpaired electrons, which determine their magnetic properties.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Indicate whether each of the following compounds is expected to be diamagnetic or paramagnetic, and give a reason for your answer in each case: (a) \(\mathrm{NbCl}_{5}\), (b) \(\mathrm{CrCl}_{2}\), (c) \(\mathrm{CuCl}\), (d) \(\mathrm{RuO}_{4}\), (e) \(\mathrm{NiCl}_{2}\).

Assess the feasibility of reducing \(\mathrm{TiO}_{2}\) to titanium metal by roasting in carbon monoxide. (a) Write a reaction for this process. (b) Use the thermodynamic quantities given in Appendix \(C\) to calculate \(\Delta G^{\circ}, \Delta H^{\circ}\), and \(\Delta S^{\circ}\) for this reaction. Is this reaction spontaneous at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) under standard conditions? (c) If we assume that \(\Delta H^{\circ}\) and \(S^{\circ}\) values do not change with temperature, at what temperature would this process become spontaneous? Do you think this process would be practical?

Introduction of carbon into a metallic lattice generally results in a harder, less ductile substance with lower electrical and thermal conductivities. Explain why this might be so.

Magnesium is obtained by electrolysis of molten \(\mathrm{MgCl}_{2}\). (a) Why isn't an aqueous solution of \(\mathrm{MgCl}_{2}\) used in the electrolysis? (b) Several cells are connected in parallel by very large copper buses that convey current to the cells. Assuming that the cells are \(96 \%\) efficient in producing the desired products in electrolysis, what mass of \(\mathrm{Mg}\) is formed by passing a current of \(97,000 \mathrm{~A}\) for a period of \(24 \mathrm{hr}\)?

For each of the following alloy compositions indicate whether you would expect it to be a substitutional alloy, an interstitial alloy, or an intermetallic compound: (a) \(\mathrm{Cu}_{0.66} \mathrm{Zn}_{0.34}\) (b) \(\mathrm{Ag}_{3} \mathrm{Sn},(\mathrm{c}) \mathrm{Ti}_{0.99} \mathrm{O}_{001}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.