/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 What is wrong with the following... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 7

What is wrong with the following statement? Twenty years ago an ancient artifact was determined to be 1900 years old. It must now be 1920 years old. [Section 1.5]

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is nothing wrong with the statement. The artifact was determined to be 1900 years old twenty years ago, and with the passage of twenty years, it is now indeed 1920 years old.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the initial age of the artifact

Twenty years ago, the ancient artifact was determined to be 1900 years old. This means during that time, the artifact was 1900 years old.
02

Calculate the current age of the artifact

As our reference point is set twenty years ago, we need to add 20 years to the artifact's age to find its current age. This can be represented as: \(1900 + 20 = 1920\). The artifact would now be 1920 years old, according to the given statement.
03

Identify the problem with the statement

The statement says, "It must now be 1920 years old." The problem with the statement is that it is actually correct. The given information supports the conclusion that the artifact is now 1920 years old since twenty years have passed since it was determined to be 1900 years old.
04

Conclusion

There is nothing logically wrong with the statement. The artifact was determined to be 1900 years old twenty years ago, and with the passage of twenty years, it is now 1920 years old.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A copper refinery produces a copper ingot weighing \(150 \mathrm{lb}\). If the copper is drawn into wire whose diameter is \(8.25 \mathrm{~mm}\), how many feet of copper can be obtained from the ingot? The density of copper is \(8.94 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) (Assume that the wire is a cylinder whose volume is \(V=\pi r^{2} h\), where \(r\) is its radius and \(h\) is its height or length.)

The concepts of accuracy and precision are not always easy to grasp. Here are two sets of studies: (a) The mass of a secondary weight standard is determined by weighing it on a very precise balance under carefully controlled laboratory conditions. The average of 18 different weight measurements is taken as the weight of the standard. (b) A group of 10,000 males between the ages of 50 and 55 is surveyed to ascertain a relationship between calorie intake and blood cholesterol level. The survey questionnaire is quite detailed, asking the respondents about what they eat, smoking and drinking habits, and so on. The results are reported as showing that for men of comparable lifestyles, there is a \(40 \%\) chance of the blood cholesterol level being above 230 for those who consume more than 40 calories per gram of body weight per day, as compared with those who consume fewer than 30 calories per gram of body weight per day. Discuss and compare these two studies in terms of the precision and accuracy of the result in each case. How do the two studies differ in nature in ways that affect the accuracy and precision of the results? What makes for high precision and accuracy in any given study? In each of these studies, what factors might not be controlled that could affect the accuracy and precision? What steps can be taken generally to attain higher precision and accuracy?

Indicate the number of significant figures in each of the following measured quantities: (a) \(3.774 \mathrm{~km}\), (b) \(205 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\), (c) \(1.700 \mathrm{~cm}\), (d) \(350.00 \mathrm{~K}\), (e) \(307.080 \mathrm{~g}\).

(a) The diameter of Earth at the equator is \(7926.381 \mathrm{mi}\). Round this number to three significant figures, and express it in standard exponential notation. (b) The circumference of Earth through the poles is \(40,008 \mathrm{~km}\). Round this number to four significant figures, and express it in standard exponential notation.

Make the following conversions: (a) \(62^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) to \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), (b) \(216.7\) \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), (c) \(233^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to \(\mathrm{K}\), (d) \(315 \mathrm{~K}\) to \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), (e) \(2500^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) to \(\mathrm{K}\).
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

Inorganic Chemistry

Read Explanation

Making Measurements

Read Explanation

Nuclear Chemistry

Read Explanation

Kinetics

Read Explanation

Ionic and Molecular Compounds

Read Explanation

Chemical Reactions

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.