Chapter 7: Problem 31
Why is it much harder to explain the line spectra of polyelectronic atoms and ions than it is to explain the line spectra of hydrogen and hydrogenlike ions?
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 7: Problem 31
Why is it much harder to explain the line spectra of polyelectronic atoms and ions than it is to explain the line spectra of hydrogen and hydrogenlike ions?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Give the maximum number of electrons in an atom that can have these quantum numbers: a. \(n=0, \ell=0, m_{\ell}=0\) b. \(n=2, \ell=1, m_{\ell}=-1, m_{s}=-\frac{1}{2}\) c. \(n=3, m_{s}=+\frac{1}{2}\) d. \(n=2, \ell=2\) e. \(n=1, \ell=0, m_{\ell}=0\)
An electron is excited from the \(n=1\) ground state to the \(n=3\) state in a hydrogen atom. Which of the following statements are true? Correct the false statements to make them true. a. It takes more energy to ionize (completely remove) the electron from \(n=3\) than from the ground state. b. The electron is farther from the nucleus on average in the \(n=3\) state than in the \(n=1\) state. c. The wavelength of light emitted if the electron drops from \(n=3\) to \(n=2\) will be shorter than the wavelength of light emitted if the electron falls from \(n=3\) to \(n=1\). d. The wavelength of light emitted when the electron returns to the ground state from \(n=3\) will be the same as the wavelength of light absorbed to go from \(n=1\) to \(n=3\). e. For \(n=3\), the electron is in the first excited state.
In the second row of the periodic table, \(\mathrm{Be}, \mathrm{N}\), and \(\mathrm{Ne}\) all have endothermic (unfavorable) electron affinities, whereas the other second-row elements have exothermic (favorable) electron affinities. Rationalize why Be, \(\mathrm{N}\), and Ne have unfavorable electron affinities.
One bit of evidence that the quantum mechanical model is "correct" lies in the magnetic properties of matter. Atoms with unpaired electrons are attracted by magnetic fields and thus are said to exhibit paramagnetism. The degree to which this effect is observed is directly related to the number of unpaired electrons present in the atom. Consider the ground-state electron configurations for \(\mathrm{Li}, \mathrm{N}, \mathrm{Ni}, \mathrm{Te}, \mathrm{Ba}\), and \(\mathrm{Hg} .\) Which of these atoms would be expected to be paramagnetic, and how many unpaired electrons are present in each paramagnetic atom?
An unknown element is a nonmetal and has a valence electron configuration of \(n s^{2} n p^{4}\). a. How many valence electrons does this element have? b. What are some possible identities for this element? c. What is the formula of the compound this element would form with potassium? d. Would this element have a larger or smaller radius than barium? e. Would this element have a greater or smaller ionization energy than fluorine?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.