/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q1FSAC. Case 1: T J InternationalT J Int... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Case 1: T J International

T J International was founded in 1969 as Trus Joist International. The firm, a manufacturer of specialty building products, has its headquarters in Boise, Idaho. The company, through its partnership in the Trus Joist MacMillan joint venture, develops and manufactures engineered lumber. This product is a high-quality substitute for structural lumber and uses lower-grade wood and materials formerly considered waste. The company also is majority owner of the Outlook Window Partnership, which is a consortium of three wood and vinyl window manufacturers.

Following is T J International’s adapted income statement and information concerning inventories from its annual report.

T J International

Sales \(618,876,000

Cost of goods sold 475,476,000

Gross profit 143,400,000

Selling and administrative expenses 102,112,000

Income from operations 41,288,000

Other expense 24,712,000

Income before income tax 16,576,000

Income taxes 7,728,000

Net income \) 8,848,000

Inventories.Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market and include material, labor, and production overhead costs. Inventories consisted of the following:

Current Year Prior Year

Finished goods \(27,512,000 \)23,830,000

Raw materials and

work-in-progress 34,363,00033,244,000

61,875,000 57,074,000

Reduction to LIFO cost (5,263,000) (3,993,000)

\(56,612,000 \)53,081,000

The last-in, first-out (LIFO) method is used for determining the cost of lumber, veneer, Microllamlumber, TJI joists, and open web joists. Approximately 35 percent of total inventories at the end of the current year were valued using the LIFO method. The first-in, first-out (FIFO) method is used to determine the cost of all other inventories.

Instructions

(a) How much would income before taxes have been if FIFO costing had been used to value all inventories?

(b) If the income tax rate is 46.6%, what would income tax have been if FIFO costing had been used to value all inventories ? In your opinion, is this difference in net income between the two methods material? Explain.

(c) Does the use of a different costing system for different types of inventory mean that there is a different physical flow of goods among the different types of inventory? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

1) Income before tax $21,839,000

2) Income tax $10,176,974

Different costing systems are adopted for different inventories to match the cost with their physical flow and other inventories’ costs.

Step by step solution

01

income before tax under FIFO costing

With the given data, if the FIFO method has been used, then the ending inventory in the current year would be $5,263,000 higher than the given amount. In such a case, COGS would be lower by $5,263,000. So, the new gross profit would be:

Newgrossprofit=Currentgrossprofit+DecreaseinCOGS=$143,400,000+$5,263,000=$148,663,000

As the gross profit has increased, income before taxes would also increase by the same amount.

Incomebeforetaxes=NewGrossProfit-Sellingandadministrativeexpenses-Otherexpenses=$148,663,000-$102,112,000-$24,712,000$21,839,000

02

New Income tax

NewIncometax=NewIncomebeforetaxes×taxrate=$21,839,000×46.6100=$10,176,974

Newnetincome=Newincomebeforetaxes-NewIncometax=$21,839,000-$10,176,974=$11,662,026

There is a big gap between the current given net income and the new computed net income. So the change in net income due to different methods is material.

03

Different costing systems for different types of inventory

Physical flow may differ for certain types of inventory. But inventory valuation method does not depend on the physical flow of goods. A different costing system may be adopted for the inventories having the same physical flow. Physical flow may be similar for different inventories, but cost flow may differ by adopting the same inventory costing system due to the degree of difference in cost.

For this purpose, different costing systems are used for different inventories, irrespective of their physical flow. The physical flow may match the cost flow of the goods and other inventories.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: In January 2017, Susquehanna Inc. requested and secured permission from the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service to compute inventories under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method and elected to determine inventory cost under the dollar-value LIFO method. Susquehanna Inc. satisfied the commissioner that cost could be accurately determined by use of an index number computed from a representative sample selected from the company’s single inventory pool.

Instructions

(a) Why should inventories be included in (1) a balance sheet and (2) the computation of net income?

(b) The Internal Revenue Code allows some accountable events to be considered differently for income tax reporting purposes and financial accounting purposes, while other accountable events must be reported the same for both purposes. Discuss why it might be desirable to report some accountable events differently for financial accounting purposes than for income tax reporting purposes.

(c) Discuss the ways and conditions under which the FIFO and LIFO inventory costing methods produce different inventory valuations. Do not discuss procedures for computing inventory cost.

As compared with the FIFO method of costing inventories, does the LIFO method result in a larger or smaller net income in a period of rising prices? What is the comparative effect on net income in a period of falling prices?

Geddes Corporation is a medium-sized manufacturing company with two divisions and three subsidiaries, all located in the United States. The Metallic Division manufactures metal castings for the automotive industry, and the Plastic Division produces small plastic items for electrical products and other uses. The three subsidiaries manufacture various products for other industrial users.

Geddes Corporation plans to change from the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO)-cost-or market method of inventory valuation to the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of inventory valuation to obtain tax benefits. To make the method acceptable for tax purposes, the change also will be made for its annual financial statements.

Instructions

(a) Describe the establishment of and subsequent pricing procedures for each of the following LIFO inventory methods.

(1) LIFO applied to units of product when the periodic inventory system is

used.

(2) Application of the dollar-value method to LIFO units of product.

(b) Discuss the specific advantages and disadvantages of using the dollar-value LIFO application as compared to specific goods LIFO (unit LIFO). (Ignore income tax considerations.)

(c) Discuss the general advantages and disadvantages claimed for LIFO methods.

Distinguish between product costs and period costs as they relate to inventory.

Mishima, Inc. indicated in a recent annual report that approximately $19 million of merchandise was received on consignment. Should Mishima, Inc. report this amount on its balance sheet? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.