/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q17-18Q Question: Your classmate Kate be... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Question: Your classmate Kate believes that the equity method is applied with a strict application of the 鈥20%鈥 rule. Do you agree? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

No, because some reason might affect the strict application of the 20% rule.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of 20% rule 

The equity method of the 20% rule states that the voting right of share more than 20% has a significant influence on investee.

02

Reasons for strict application of 20% rule

The reason that affects the strict application of the 20% rule:

  1. Where ownership includes many small groups of shareholders, then the significant influence opposes by these groups of the shareholders.
  2. Where the investor holding 20% or more shares fail to influence the board of directors, then the strict application opposes.
  3. Where the company rejects the holding of the 20% or more share of an investor

Hence, these are why the 20% rule cannot be strictly applied under the equity method.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An intangible asset with an estimated useful life of 30 years was acquired on January 1, 2007, for $540,000. On January 1, 2017, a review was made of intangible assets and their expected service lives, and it was determined that this asset had an estimated useful life of 30 more years from the date of the review. What is the amount of amortization for this intangible in 2017?

Question: Michek Company loans Sarasota Company \(2,000,000 at 6% for 3 years on January 1, 2017. Michek intends to hold this loan to maturity. The fair value of the loan at the end of each reporting period is as follows.

December 31, 2017 \)2,050,000

December 31, 2018 2,020,000

December 31, 2019 2,000,000

Prepare the journal entry(ies) at December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2019, for Michek related to these bonds, assuming (a) itdoes not use the fair value option, and (b) it uses the fair value option. Interest is paid on January 1.

Hiram Co. uses the equity method to account for investments in common stock. What accounting should be made for dividends received from these investments subsequent to the date of investment?

Taylor Swift Corporation purchases a patent from Salmon Company on January 1, 2017, for $54,000. The patent has a remaining legal life of 16 years. Taylor Swift feels the patent will be useful for 10 years. Prepare Taylor Swift鈥檚 journal entries to record the purchase of the patent and 2017 amortization.

Question: (Accounting for Patents) On June 30, 2017, your client, Ferry Company, was granted two patents covering plastic cartons that it had been producing and marketing profitably for the past 3 years. One patent covers the manufacturing process, and the other covers the related products.

Ferry executives tell you that these patents represent the most significant breakthrough in the industry in the past 30 years. The products have been marketed under the registered trademarks Evertight, Duratainer, and Sealrite. Licenses under the patents have already been granted by your client to other manufacturers in the United States and abroad, and are producing substantial royalties.

On July 1, Ferry commenced patent infringement actions against several companies whose names you recognize as those of substantial and prominent competitors. Ferry鈥檚 management is optimistic that these suits will result in a permanent injunction against the manufacture and sale of the infringing products as well as collection of damages for loss of profits caused by the alleged infringement.

The financial vice president has suggested that the patents be recorded at the discounted value of expected net royalty receipts.

Instructions

  1. What is the meaning of 鈥渄iscounted value of expected net receipts鈥? Explain.
  2. How would such a value be calculated for net royalty receipts?
  3. What basis of valuation for Ferry鈥檚 patents would be generally accepted in accounting? Give supporting reasons for this basis.
  4. Assuming no practical problems of implementation and ignoring generally accepted accounting principles, what is the preferable basis of valuation for patents? Explain.
  5. What would be the preferable theoretical basis of amortization? Explain.
  6. What recognition, if any, should be made of the infringement litigation in the financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2017? Discuss.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.