/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Question 30Q How does the acid-test ratio dif... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

How does the acid-test ratio differ from the current ratio? How are they similar?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The primary difference between the acid-test ratio and the current ratio is that the current ratio estimates the ability of the company to clear off its debts by using short-term assets. On the other hand, the acid-test ratio or quick ratio evaluates the ability of the company to clear its debts by using short-term assets excluding inventory.

The acid test ratio is similar to the current ratio as both highlight the liquidity of the company.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Ratio

The ratio can be defined as the measure of one value or number in relation to another. A ratio can be expressed in various ways, including as a percentage, a fraction, a 鈥渢imes鈥 figure, a number of days, a rate, or as a simple manner. Ratios are just signals or clues rather than the answers to complex questions about a company.

02

Difference between acid-test ratio and a current ratio

Acid-test ratio and current ratio can be distinguished on the following grounds:

  • Current ratio is the ratio that evaluates the potential of the company to clear off its debts with the help of current assets. On the other hand, the acid test ratio, also called the quick ratio, is the ratio that excludes inventory while evaluating the liquidity of the company, as inventory is considered to be a less liquid current asset in comparison to others.
  • Current ratio is computed by dividing current assets by the current liabilities, while acid test ratio is calculated by dividing quick assets by current liabilities. Here, quick assets mean current assets minus inventories.
  • The working capital ratio of 2:1 is regarded as desirable, which means that there are two assets to cover each liability. Whereas, in the case of acid test ratio, a ratio of 1:1 is satisfactory. However, if the value is significantly less than 1, it implies that the company has a large amount of its cash tied up in productive assets, so the company may struggle to raise money in the short term.
  • Current ratio is suitable for all types of companies, whereas the acid test ratio is suitable for companies holding a significant amount of inventory.
03

Similarities between acid-test ratio and a current ratio

The acid test ratio is similar to the current ratio as both are considered to be liquidity analysis ratios because they highlight the liquidity of the company. The acid test ratio is used to ascertain whether the value of the company鈥檚 short assets is capable enough to cover its short-term liabilities. Likewise, the current ratio is also used to ascertain the company鈥檚 ability to meet its short-term liabilities.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Carow Corporation purchased, as a held-for-collection investment, \(60,000 of the 8%, 5-year bonds of Harrison, Inc.

for \)65,118, which provides a 6% return. The bonds pay interest semiannually. Prepare Carow鈥檚 journal entries for (a) the purchase

of the investment, and (b) the receipt of semiannual interest and premium amortization

How is present value related to the concept of a liability?

Question: On February 1, 2018, one of the huge storage tanks of Viking Manufacturing Company exploded. Windows in houses and other buildings within a one-mile radius of the explosion were severely damaged, and a number of people were injured. As of February 15, 2018 (When the December 31, 2017, financial statements were completed and sent to the publisher for printing and public distribution), no suits had been filed or claims asserted against the company as a consequence of the explosion. The company fully anticipates that suits will be filed and claims asserted for injuries and damages. Because the casualty was uninsured and the company is considered at fault, Viking Manufacturing will have to cover the damages from its own resources.InstructionsDiscuss fully the accounting treatment and disclosures that should be accorded the casualty and related contingent losses in the financial statements dated December 31, 2017.

Leppard Corporation Sells DVD players. The corporation also offers its customers a 4-year warranty contract. During 2017, Leppard sold 20,000 warranty contracts at \(99 each. The corporation spent \)180,000 servicing warranties during 2017. Prepare Leppard鈥檚 journal entries for (a) the sale of contracts, (b) the cost of servicing the warranties, and (c) the recognition of warranty revenue. Assume the service costs are inventory costs.

BE13-1 (L01) Roley Corporation uses a periodic inventory system and the gross method of accounting for purchase discounts. On July 1, Roley purchased \(60,000 of inventory, terms 2/10, n/30, FOB shipping point. Roley paid freight costs of \)1,200. On July 3, Roley returned damaged goods and received credit of $6,000. On July 10, Roley paid for the goods. Prepare all necessary journal entries for Roley.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.